Question

In: Economics

do tou agree wjth the argument that globalization constrains the autonomh and capacity of the state?...

do tou agree wjth the argument that globalization constrains the autonomh and capacity of the state? why or why not?
must be 600 words and not word for word from google

Solutions

Expert Solution

Ans: yes I agree with the argument that globalisation constrained autonomy and capacity of the state and it is because of the following reasons.

  • Globalisation is a concept where the presence of the organisation is around all over the world. Globalisation increases the quality of the production because of the existence of international competition in the market.
  • Globalisation restricts the presence of the state because all the activities for passing through the central bank therefore it is important that all the corporate sectors are in favour of globalisation.
  • Globalisation reduces the risk of the monotony of a particular sector in the economy because it provides an open platform to all the corporate houses to believe and to take the risk for the announcement of the activities.
  • It is important to break the autonomy of the state because the state's involvement in any of the policy created a lot of confusion and lots of restriction on the production of the commodities in the state.
  • Globalisation is a good concept which ultimately increases the lots of facilities to the public by providing International standard goods.
  • Globalisation provides an open platform to all the business houses to increase productivity by providing a quality product at a reasonable price because this is the biggest challenge in front of the corporate houses.
  • Globalisation working on the principle of the increase of market share in the country.
  • The concept of globalisation is very clear: the spread of production units all over the world and there are no restrictions on the increase of the units.
  • Globalisation is also known as multinational companies because the head office is operating only in one country but the branches are existing all over the world.
  • Globalisation provides the limit where the involvement of state authorities for the state is not possible because the only financial authority in the country is the Central Bank.
  • The benefits of the globalisation are very large therefore the state is not going to take any negative initiative which is harmful to the development of the MNCs in the country, as it helps in the reduction of poverty and to enhance the employment opportunities in the domestic territory.
  • Globalisation is work on the basis of demand and supply forces in the market so if any country enhances the demand of new products on an international basis then the concept of globalisation is perfectly fit in that type of country.
  • The concept of globalisation is helpful and self-monitor concept shows the involvement of straight is not at all required because the state is involved directly and indirectly in the system just only in the case of a thread which is not possible to cover at a short-run level.

Sometimes the interference of the state is very important because of the following reasons.

  • The monitoring of the state is very important so that it is the Assurance of the quality product in the market.
  • The presence of the state will ensure less fraud in the economy.
  • In the legal proceedings in the business houses, the involvement of the state is important.
  • The involvement of the state is also very important because there are two faces in the economy that won the Global competition And the other thing is the protection of the domestic industries. It is very important to make a balance in both situations. Nowadays all countries are under the contract of free trade and there is no limit to the sale and purchase of the commodities.
  • The involvement of the state is also very important so that the monitoring of the financial channel and distribution can be possible smoothly.

Related Solutions

Do you agree with the argument of the appellate buyer or the argument of the state supreme court? Why?
A seller agreed to give a buyer the first right to purchase the remainder of her property if she chose to sell it. When the seller died, the buyer filed suit against the estate, seeking the option to purchase. The two parties entered into a settlement agreement that was disapproved by the probate court. After the probate court's disapproval, the parties continued to attempt to negotiate a sale. They then entered into a second settlement agreement that was never signed....
Do you agree with Krugman’s argument? Why or why not? asia's miracle
Do you agree with Krugman’s argument? Why or why not? asia's miracle
Globalization is argued to impact the environment in a negative way. Do you agree or disagree?...
Globalization is argued to impact the environment in a negative way. Do you agree or disagree? As you take a look at your local environment, do you see how globalization has had an impact? If yes, would you say it has been positive or negative or both? Please give reasons for your answer. Please write no less than 300 words and be as complete as you can in your response including adding citations as needed. If you do, please use...
Discuss the “nature” versus “nurture” argument. Which side do you agree with; or do you find...
Discuss the “nature” versus “nurture” argument. Which side do you agree with; or do you find yourself in the middle? Provide at least one example of both from your professional life and one from your personal life. Do not forget to utilize resources to support your answers!
Listen to the following conversation by Paul Farmer. Do you agree or disagree with his argument...
Listen to the following conversation by Paul Farmer. Do you agree or disagree with his argument that health care is a human right? Why/Why not? Share at least one outside resource to support your argument. Paul Farmer: I Believe in Health Care as a Human Right.
Listen to the following conversation by Paul Farmer. Do you agree or disagree with his argument...
Listen to the following conversation by Paul Farmer. Do you agree or disagree with his argument that health care is a human right? Why/Why not? Share at least one outside resource to support your argument. Paul Farmer: I Believe in Health Care as a Human Right.
Is bluffing in business ethical? Summarize Carr’s argument. Do you agree with him? Does bluffing pass...
Is bluffing in business ethical? Summarize Carr’s argument. Do you agree with him? Does bluffing pass Hooker’s generalization test in poker? Does it pass the generalization test in business? Discuss.
Economic interdependence is associated with stability of state relationships. Do you agree or disagree with the...
Economic interdependence is associated with stability of state relationships. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Support your position by offering at least three historical examples.
Many experts state that video is the future of content marketing. Do you agree with this...
Many experts state that video is the future of content marketing. Do you agree with this statement? Why or Why not? What are the Pros and Cons of this type of (video) content? Again, be sure to include information from the supplemental materials provided to you for this case to support your answer.
why do tou wanna work at a law firm why do you wanna work at our...
why do tou wanna work at a law firm why do you wanna work at our law firm?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT