Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Questions 19-22 are based on the following data: A sample of randomly selected non-fatal work related...

Questions 19-22 are based on the following data: A sample of randomly selected non-fatal work related injuries categorized according to the weekday they occurred in is given below.

Day

Mon

Tues

Wed

Thurs

Fri

Number

23

23

21

21

19

20. What is the expected value for Mondays if injuries were thrice as likely on Mondays and twice as likely on Fridays as they were in all other days of the working week?

  • 13.375

  • 23

  • 26.75

  • 40.125

Use a .05 significance level to test the claim that such injuries occur with equal frequency throughout the week. What is the p-value?

  • Same frequency, since p = .01

  • Different frequencies, since p = .01

  • Same frequency, since p = .99

  • Different frequencies, since p = .99

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:-

19)

State the hypotheses. The first step is to state the null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis.

Null hypothesis: The non-fatal work related injuries categorized according to the weekday occurred as per given distribution.

Alternative hypothesis: At least one of the proportions in the null hypothesis is false.

Formulate an analysis plan. For this analysis, the significance level is 0.05. Using sample data, we will conduct a chi-square goodness of fit test of the null hypothesis.

Analyze sample data. Applying the chi-square goodness of fit test to sample data, we compute the degrees of freedom, the expected frequency counts, and the chi-square test statistic. Based on the chi-square statistic and the degrees of freedom, we determine the P-value.

DF = k - 1 = 5 - 1
D.F = 4
(Ei) = n * pi


X2 = 25.174

where DF is the degrees of freedom, k is the number of levels of the categorical variable, n is the number of observations in the sample, Ei is the expected frequency count for level i, Oi is the observed frequency count for level i, and X2 is the chi-square test statistic.

The P-value is the probability that a chi-square statistic having 4 degrees of freedom is more extreme than 25.174.

We use the Chi-Square Distribution Calculator to find P(X2 > 25.174) = 0.00.

Interpret results. Since the P-value (0.00) is less than the significance level (0.05), we cannot accept the null hypothesis.

20)

State the hypotheses. The first step is to state the null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis.

Null hypothesis: Non-fatal work related injuries occur with equal frequency throughout the week.

Alternative hypothesis: At least one of the proportions in the null hypothesis is false.

Formulate an analysis plan. For this analysis, the significance level is 0.05. Using sample data, we will conduct a chi-square goodness of fit test of the null hypothesis.

Analyze sample data. Applying the chi-square goodness of fit test to sample data, we compute the degrees of freedom, the expected frequency counts, and the chi-square test statistic. Based on the chi-square statistic and the degrees of freedom, we determine the P-value.

DF = k - 1 = 5 - 1
D.F = 4
(Ei) = n * pi


X2 = 0.5234

where DF is the degrees of freedom, k is the number of levels of the categorical variable, n is the number of observations in the sample, Ei is the expected frequency count for level i, Oi is the observed frequency count for level i, and X2 is the chi-square test statistic.

The P-value is the probability that a chi-square statistic having 4 degrees of freedom is more extreme than 0.5234.

We use the Chi-Square Distribution Calculator to find P(X2 > 0.5234) = 0.97

Interpret results. Since the P-value (0.97) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we have to accept the null hypothesis.

Do not reject the null hypothesis, From the above test we have sufficient evidence in the favor of the claim that such injuries occur with equal frequency throughout the week.

Same frequency, since p = 0.97.


Related Solutions

The following data set is obtained by a randomly selected sample of 93 employees working at...
The following data set is obtained by a randomly selected sample of 93 employees working at a bank. SALARY EDUC EXPER TIME 39000 12 0 1 40200 10 44 7 42900 12 5 30 43800 8 6 7 43800 8 8 6 43800 12 0 7 43800 12 0 10 43800 12 5 6 44400 15 75 2 45000 8 52 3 45000 12 8 19 46200 12 52 3 48000 8 70 20 48000 12 6 23 48000 12...
Use the following to answer questions 20-22 Amy Co. has the following data related to an...
Use the following to answer questions 20-22 Amy Co. has the following data related to an item of inventory: Inventory, May 1 40 units @ $100 Purchase, May 7 70 units @ $80 Purchase, May 16 170 units @ $60 Ending Inventory 10 units 20. The value assigned to ending inventory if Amy uses LIFO is 21. The value assigned to cost of goods sold if Amy uses FIFO is 22. The value assigned to ending inventory if Amy uses...
The following sample observations were randomly selected:
The following sample observations were randomly selected:12345X:213832Y:18132249            a. Not available in Connect.b. Determine the regression equation.(Negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round the final answers to 4 decimal places.)                                           b =  a =Y' =  +  X           c. Determine the value of Y' whenX is 11. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round the final answer to 4 decimal places.)
following data safety injury severity Fatal non-fatal no injuries total yes 669 155,071 467,362 623,102 no...
following data safety injury severity Fatal non-fatal no injuries total yes 669 155,071 467,362 623,102 no 487 4294 3824 8605 total 1,156 159,365 471,186 631,707 using this data, we wish to determine if there is any association between using safety restraints and injury severity. as such we will use a chi-square test for independence Q10: state the null and alternative hypotheses Q11:fill in the table below with the expected counts assuming the null hypothesis is true safety restraint/injury severity fatal...
The data below represents the fields of specialization for a randomly selected sample of undergraduate students....
The data below represents the fields of specialization for a randomly selected sample of undergraduate students. We want to determine whether there is a significant difference in the fields of specialization between regions of the country. (1 point) Northeast Midwest South West Total Business 54 65 28 93 240 Engineering 15 24 8 33 80 Liberal Arts 65 84 33 98 280 Fine Arts 13 15 7 25 60 Health Sciences     3 12 4 21 40 150 200 80...
Randomly selected 22 22 student cars have ages with a mean of 7.2 7.2 years and...
Randomly selected 22 22 student cars have ages with a mean of 7.2 7.2 years and a standard deviation of 3.6 3.6 years, while randomly selected 27 27 faculty cars have ages with a mean of 5.1 5.1 years and a standard deviation of 3.5 3.5 years. 1. Use a 0.01 0.01 significance level to test the claim that student cars are older than faculty cars. (a) The test statistic is (b) The critical value is (c) Is there sufficient...
Based on this data set, are the events that the randomly selected first-major-hurricane-of-season is located on...
Based on this data set, are the events that the randomly selected first-major-hurricane-of-season is located on the Atlantic and the event that the selected first-major-hurricane-of-season is in July independent events? On your "scratch paper" use a calculation and explanation to justify the answer you chose. ta on Month of First Hurricane of Season Water Jun Jul Aug Sep Summary Atlantic (A) 0 0 6 2 8 Both (B) 0 1 0 0 1 Gulf (G) 2 2 0 0 4...
Next 3 questions are based on this scenario: A hypothetical Poll interviewed 1012 randomly selected U.S....
Next 3 questions are based on this scenario: A hypothetical Poll interviewed 1012 randomly selected U.S. adults aged 18 and older. Based on this poll, it was learned that 61% of those interviewed believed in global warming. The other 39% thought that global warming would never happen. Question: What is the population? Select one: a. The 39% who thought global warming would never happen b. The 1012 randomly selected U.S. adults c. All U.S. adults d. The 61% who said...
A study of seat belt users and nonusers yielded the randomly selected sample data summarized in...
A study of seat belt users and nonusers yielded the randomly selected sample data summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the amount of smoking is independent of seat belt use. A plausible theory is that people who smoke are less concerned about their health and safety and are therefore less inclined to wear seat belts. Is this theory supported by the sample​ data? Number of Cigarettes Smoked per Day 0 1–14...
A study of seat belt users and nonusers yielded the randomly selected sample data summarized in...
A study of seat belt users and nonusers yielded the randomly selected sample data summarized in the given table. Number of cigarettes smoked per day 0 1-14 15 and over Wear seat belts 185 30 50 Don't wear seat belts 155 25 55 At the 0.01 significance level, test the claim that the amount of smoking is independent of seat belt use. Which of the following is true? Select one: a. The expected value of the test statistics is 13.50...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT