In: Statistics and Probability
Illinois State is worried about the rise in crimes in the state. The State Crime Control Unit engaged the services of a researcher to identify the factors that are contributing to rise in crime in the state. The researcher collected data for 50 cities within Illinois to ascertain the cause of rising crime. She collected data on seven variables including overall crime rate per 1 million residents in each of the 50 cities and reported violent crime rate per 100,000 residents.
The details of variables on which she collected data are as following.
Variable Name |
Description |
Crime Rate |
Overall crime rate per 1 million residents |
Violent Crime Rate |
Reported violent crime rate per 100,000 residents |
Funding |
Annual police funding in $/resident |
High School |
% of people 25 years+ with 4 yrs. of high school |
School Dropout |
% of 16 to 19 year-olds not in high school and not high school graduates |
Undergraduate |
% of 18 to 24 year-olds in college |
Graduate |
% of people 25 years+ with at least 4 years of college |
R2:
Adjusted R2:
Coefficient of Funding:
Coefficient of undergraduate:
Standard Error of Estimate:
Regression Analysis | ||||||
Regression Statistics | ||||||
Multiple R | 0.5701 | |||||
R Square | 0.3250 | |||||
Adjusted R Square | 0.2810 | |||||
Standard Error | 249.2410 | |||||
Observations | 50 | |||||
ANOVA | ||||||
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||
Regression | 3 | 1376029.9687 | 458676.6562 | 7.3836 | 0.0004 | |
Residual | 46 | 2857569.9513 | 62121.0859 | |||
Total | 49 | 4233599.9200 | ||||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 90% | Upper 90% | |
Intercept | 612.8399 | 232.7230 | 2.6333 | 0.0115 | 222.1770 | 1003.5028 |
Funding | 11.9794 | 2.7266 | 4.3935 | 0.0001 | 7.4024 | 16.5565 |
Undergraduate | 0.3722 | 2.5706 | 0.1448 | 0.8855 | -3.9429 | 4.6873 |
High School | -6.0944 | 3.6949 | -1.6494 | 0.1059 | -12.2969 | 0.1080 |
R2=0.3250 i.e. 32.50% of total variation in Crime Rate is explained by this regression equation.
Adjusted R2=0.2810 i.e. 28.1% of the variation in Crime Rate is explained by the model, adjusted for the number of predictors in the model relative to the number of observations. Note that R2 always increases when we add a new predictor to the model, even when there is no real improvement to the model. However the value of adjusted R2 increases only when the new term improves the model.Thus the adjusted R2 value incorporates the number of predictors in the model to choose the correct model.
Coefficient of Funding=11.9794 i.e. the response variable (i.e. Crime rate) is increased by 11.9794 (per 1 million residents) when Funding is increased by $1/resident while holding other predictors in the model constant.
Standard Error of Estimate is the average distance that the observed values fall from the regression line. Smaller values are better because it indicates that the observations are closer to the fitted line. Here it is 249.2410 which is too high hence fitting is not good.