Question

In: Economics

A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program. The...

A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program. The alternatives are:

A B C
installed cost $10,000 $15,000 $20,000
annual benefit 1,625 1,530 1,890
useful life (yrs) 10 20 20

The salvage value of each alternative is zero. At the end of 10 years, Alternative A could be replaced with another A with identical cost and benefits.

(a) which alternative should be selected if interest is 6%?

(b) 3%

(c) if there is a difference between parts (a) and (b) can you explain it?

Solutions

Expert Solution

As per the question Alternatives A,B and C are mutually exclusive

Alternative A

Alternative B

Alternative C

Installed Cost (I)

$10000

$15000

$20000

Annual Benefit (A)

$1625

$1530

$1890

Useful life (N)

10

20

20

Salvage value (S) = 0

(A) As the question the rate of interest (i)= 6%

Though the lifecycle of A alternative is not equal with alternative B and C, so to convert the unequal lifecycle to equal lifecycle. The effective Life cycle of Alternative A has to repeat 1 times for estimating the net present worth (NPW)

Alternative A

NPW of Alternative A = 10000 + 10000(P/F,6%,10) + 1625(P/A,6%,20)

NPW of Alternative A = 10000 + 10000(0.5584) + 1625(11.4699)

NPW of Alternative A = 10000 + 5584 + 18638.59 = $34222.59

Alternative B

NPW of Alternative B = 15000 + 1530(P/A,6%,20) = 15000 + 1530(11.4699)

NPW of Alternative B = 15000 + 17548.95 = $32548.95

Alternative C

NPW of Alternative C = 20000 + 1890(P/A,6%,20) = 20000 + 1890(11.4699)

NPW of Alternative C = 20000 + 21678.11 = $41678.11 (Highest NPW)

Among three different alternatives, Alternative C should be selected for highest net present worth (NPW)

(B) As the question the rate of interest (i)= 3%

Though the lifecycle of A alternative is not equal with alternative B and C, so to convert the unequal lifecycle to equal lifecycle. The effective Life cycle of Alternative A has to repeat 1 times for estimating the net present worth (NPW)

Alternative A

NPW of Alternative A = 10000 + 10000(P/F,3%,10) + 1625(P/A,3%,20)

NPW of Alternative A = 10000 + 10000(0.7441) + 1625(14.8775)

NPW of Alternative A = 10000 + 7441 + 24175.94 = $41616.94

Alternative B

NPW of Alternative B = 15000 + 1530(P/A,3%,20) = 15000 + 1530(14.8775)

NPW of Alternative B = 15000 + 22762.57 = $37762.57

Alternative C

NPW of Alternative C = 20000 + 1890(P/A,3%,20) = 20000 + 1890(14.8775)

NPW of Alternative C = 20000 + 28118.47 = $48,118.47 (Highest NPW)

Among three different alternatives, Alternative C should be selected for highest net present worth (NPW)

(C) there is no difference between part (A) and part (B) for selecting the best alternative, because in both the part the net present worth of alternative C is highest, so alternative C has to be selected in the both part (A) and part (B).

NPW of Alternative A

NPW of Alternative B

NPW of Alternative C

Rate of Interest (i) = 6%

$34222.59

$32548.95

$41678.11 (Highest)

Rate of Interest (i) = 3%

$41616.94

$37762.57

$48,118.47 (Highest)

Due to the change in the rate of interest the value of net present worth of alternatives changes which is given in the above table.


Related Solutions

A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives aspart of a production improvement program. The...
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program. The alternatives are as follows:A                         B                            CInstalled Cost ($)                                   10,000                 15,000                 20,000Uniform Annual benefit ($)                    1,625            1,625                  2000Useful life (Years)                                 20                 20                       20         For each alternative, the salvage value is zero. The MARR is 6%. Which alternative should be selected based on the INCREMENTAL ANALYSIS method?
A manufacturing company is considering two mutually exclusive alternatives. Alternatives                            &nb
A manufacturing company is considering two mutually exclusive alternatives. Alternatives                                    Alt. A         Alt. B Initial cost              $ 42,500    $ 70,000 Annual costs O & M                      $ 6,000       $ 4,000 Annual savings       $ 18,500   $ 20,000 Residual value         $ 12,000   $ 25,000 Shelf life                   3 years   6 years What would be the "advantage" in annual terms of Alternative B versus Alternative A at 15% interest? Select one: a. $ 3020 b. $ 3500 c. $ 7436 d. Alternative B does...
Three (3) mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the production equipment at a toilet tissue...
Three (3) mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the production equipment at a toilet tissue paper factory. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given here. (All cash flows are in thousands.). Use the EUAW (Equivalent Uniform Annual Worth) method to determine which equipment alternative, if any should be selected? The firm’s MARR is 18%. Cash flow diagrams must be included. A B C Capital investment 2000 4200 7000 Annual revenues 3200 6000 8000 Annual costs 2100 4000...
A firm is considering two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, both of which cost $5,000. The firm's...
A firm is considering two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, both of which cost $5,000. The firm's expected rate of return is 12 percent. The cash flows associated with each investment are: Year Investment A Investment B 1 $ 2000 $ 1000 2 $1500 $ 1500 3 $1500 $ 2000 4 $1000 $3000 For each alternative calculate the payback period, the net present value, and the profitably index. Which alternative (if any) should be selected?
Final Finishing is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for a new polisher. Each alternative has an...
Final Finishing is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for a new polisher. Each alternative has an expected life of 10 years and no salvage value. Polisher I requires an initial investment of $20,000 and provides annual benefits of $4,465. Polisher II requires an initial investment of $10,000 and provides annual benefits of $1,770. Polisher III requires an initial investment of $15,000 and provides annual benefits of $3,580. MARR is 15%/yr. Based on an internal rate of return analysis, which polisher...
There are three mutually exclusive alternatives, as vendors to outsource a project, with the following cash...
There are three mutually exclusive alternatives, as vendors to outsource a project, with the following cash flow and useful life. Which of these three alternatives would you recommend to be selected? The MARR is 10% per year. Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 First Cost $60,000 $35,000 $25,000 Annual operating and maintenance cost $3,000 every 4 years $1,000 per year $2,000 in yr 1 and it increases by $200 every year thereafter Salvage value $10,000 $4,000 $3,000 Useful life, years...
There are three mutually exclusive alternatives being considered.  One of the three must be selected, so this...
There are three mutually exclusive alternatives being considered.  One of the three must be selected, so this is a set of three cost alternatives.  MARR is 15% and the life of each project is 12 years.  These projects are: Project I Capital Cost: $130,000 Revenue/Savings: 22,000 Expense/Cost: $12,000 Salvage: $25,000 Project II Capital Cost: $100,000 Revenue/Savings: $10,000 Expense/Cost: $15,000 Salvage: $20,000 Project III Capital Cost: $160,000 Revenue/Savings: $10,000 Expense/Cost: $20,000 Salvage: $40,000 please solve asap, thank you!
A businessman has an opportunity to invest in one of three mutually exclusive alternatives. The first...
A businessman has an opportunity to invest in one of three mutually exclusive alternatives. The first alternative has a first cost of $7000, a uniform annual benefit of $2000, and a salvage value of $500. The second has a first cost of $3500, a benefit of $900 the first year, and increasing by $100 per year thereafter. Its salvage value is $400. The third alternative has a first cost of $8000, a benefit of $2000 the first year, and increasing...
A firm has two $1,000, mutually exclusive investment alternatives with the following cash inflows. The cost...
A firm has two $1,000, mutually exclusive investment alternatives with the following cash inflows. The cost of capital is 6 percent. Year Cash Inflow A B 1 $175 $1,100 2 175 - 3 175 - 4 175 - 5 175 - 6 175 - 7 175 - 8 175 - a. What is the internal rate of return on each investment? Which investment should the firm make? b. What is the net present value of each investment? Which investment should...
An American multinational company is now considering two mutually exclusive alternatives for the environmental protection equipment...
An American multinational company is now considering two mutually exclusive alternatives for the environmental protection equipment at its manufacturing plant in the United Kingdom. One of these alternatives must be selected. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are listed in the below table. Alternative A Alternative B Capital investment £ 20,000 £ 38,000 Annual expenses £ 5,500 £ 4,000 Market value at end of useful life £ 1,000 £ 4,200 Useful 5 years 10 years Assume that the equipment...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT