Question

In: Accounting

Three (3) mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the production equipment at a toilet tissue...

  1. Three (3) mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the production equipment at a toilet tissue paper factory. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given here. (All cash flows are in thousands.).
    1. Use the EUAW (Equivalent Uniform Annual Worth) method to determine which equipment alternative, if any should be selected? The firm’s MARR is 18%. Cash flow diagrams must be included.

A

B

C

Capital investment

2000

4200

7000

Annual revenues

3200

6000

8000

Annual costs

2100

4000

5100

Salvage value

100

420

600

Useful life (years)

5

10

10

Solutions

Expert Solution

Project A Project B Project C
1 Capital Investment $                                                 2,000 $                                             4,200 $                       7,000
2 Annual Revenue $                                                 3,200 $                                             6,000 $                       8,000
3 Annual Costs $                                                 2,100 $                                             4,000 $                       5,100
4 Annual Net Revenue $                                                 1,100 $                                             2,000 $                       2,900
5 Salvage Value $                                                    100 $                                                420 $                          600
6 Useful life $                                                        5 $                                                  10 $                            10
7 Present Value of Annuity Factor @18% 3.12717 4.49409 4.49409
8 Annual equivalent Investment(1/7) $                                                    640 $                                                935 $                       1,558
9 PV of Salvage value $                                                      44 $                                                  80 $                          115
10 Annual equivalent salvage value(9/7) $                                                      14 $                                                  18 $                            26
11 EUAW(4-8+10) $                                                    474 $                                             1,083 $                       1,368
Note:All the figures are rounded off to nearest $

Related Solutions

There are three mutually exclusive alternatives being considered.  One of the three must be selected, so this...
There are three mutually exclusive alternatives being considered.  One of the three must be selected, so this is a set of three cost alternatives.  MARR is 15% and the life of each project is 12 years.  These projects are: Project I Capital Cost: $130,000 Revenue/Savings: 22,000 Expense/Cost: $12,000 Salvage: $25,000 Project II Capital Cost: $100,000 Revenue/Savings: $10,000 Expense/Cost: $15,000 Salvage: $20,000 Project III Capital Cost: $160,000 Revenue/Savings: $10,000 Expense/Cost: $20,000 Salvage: $40,000 please solve asap, thank you!
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the environmental protection equipment at a petroleum refinery....
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the environmental protection equipment at a petroleum refinery. One of these alternatives must be selected. a. Which environmental protection equipment alternative should be​ selected? The​ firm's MARR is ​20% per year. Assume the equipment will be needed indefinitely. Assume repeatability is appropriate for this comparison. b. Assume the study period is shortened to five years. The market value of Alternative B after five years is estimated to be ​$16000. Which alternative would...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 12​% per year. At the end of the useful​ life, the investment will be sold. A​ decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. X Y Z Investment cost ​$275,000 ​$140,000 ​$370,000 Annual revenue ​$85,840 ​$53,207 ​$93,911 Annual cost ​$23,183 ​$14,370 ​$20,543 Useful life 15 years...
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The study period is 30 years and the​ firm's MARR is 17% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 17​% per year. a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative​ 1? b. What is the annual worth of Alternative​ 2? c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Alternative​ 1?...
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The study period is 30 years and the​ firm's MARR is 10​% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 10​% per year. a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative​ 1? b. What is the annual worth of Alternative​ 2? c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Alternative​ 1?...
Three mutually exclusive​ earth-moving pieces of equipment are being considered for several large building projects in...
Three mutually exclusive​ earth-moving pieces of equipment are being considered for several large building projects in India over the next five years. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The construction​ company's MARR is 18% per year. Which of the three​ alternatives, if​ any, should be​ adopted? Assume repeatability is appropriate for this comparison. Caterpillar Deere Case Capital investment ​$22,000 ​$26,400 ​$17,500 Net annual revenue ​$6,500 ​$9,000 ​$5,200 Salvage value ​$4,500 ​$5,000 ​$3,750 Useful life 4 years...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. A decision maker must select one of these alternatives. A B Investment cost $50,000 $30,000 Annual Revenue 15,000 10,000 Salvage value 5,000 3,000 Useful life (yrs.) 5 5 For all parts below, do not convert from another form of equivalent worth; e.g., AW→FW. 1. Compute the AW for Alt A. Based on this measure, should the...
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives aspart of a production improvement program. The...
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program. The alternatives are as follows:A                         B                            CInstalled Cost ($)                                   10,000                 15,000                 20,000Uniform Annual benefit ($)                    1,625            1,625                  2000Useful life (Years)                                 20                 20                       20         For each alternative, the salvage value is zero. The MARR is 6%. Which alternative should be selected based on the INCREMENTAL ANALYSIS method?
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program. The...
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program. The alternatives are: A B C installed cost $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 annual benefit 1,625 1,530 1,890 useful life (yrs) 10 20 20 The salvage value of each alternative is zero. At the end of 10 years, Alternative A could be replaced with another A with identical cost and benefits. (a) which alternative should be selected if interest is 6%? (b) 3% (c) if there is...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT