In: Accounting

# Rhone-Metro Industries manufactures equipment that is sold or leased. On December 31, 2018, Rhone-Metro leased equipment...

Rhone-Metro Industries manufactures equipment that is sold or leased. On December 31, 2018, Rhone-Metro leased equipment to Western Soya Co. for a four-year period ending December 31, 2022, at which time possession of the leased asset will revert back to Rhone-Metro. The equipment cost $300,000 to manufacture and has an expected useful life of six years. Its normal sales price is$365,760. The expected residual value of $25,000 at December 31, 2022, is not guaranteed. Equal payments under the lease are$104,000 (including $4,000 maintenance costs) and are due on December 31 of each year. The first payment was made on December 31, 2018. Western Soya’s incremental borrowing rate is 12%. Western Soya knows the interest rate implicit in the lease payments is 10%. Both companies use straight-line depreciation. (FV of$1, PV of $1, FVA of$1, PVA of $1, FVAD of$1 and PVAD of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided.) Required: 1. Show how Rhone-Metro calculated the$104,000 annual lease payments.
2. How should this lease be classified (a) by Western Soya Co. (the lessee) and (b) by Rhone-Metro Industries (the lessor)?
3. Prepare the appropriate entries for both Western Soya Co. and Rhone-Metro on December 31, 2018.
4. Prepare an amortization schedule(s) describing the pattern of interest over the lease term for the lessee and the lessor.
5. Prepare the appropriate entries for both Western Soya and Rhone-Metro on December 31, 2019 (the second lease payment and amortization).
6. Prepare the appropriate entries for both Western Soya and Rhone-Metro on December 31, 2022, assuming the equipment is returned to Rhone-Metro and the actual residual value on that date is $1,500. ## Solutions ##### Expert Solution  Answer 1. Let X = Amount of each annual payment PV of annual payments: Table 6, 4 payments @ 10% = 3.48685 x X PV of guaranteed residual value: Table 2, 4 periods @ 10% = .68301 x$25,000 = $17,075 3.48685X +$17,075 = $365,760 3.48685X =$348,685 X = $348,685 ÷ 3.48685 =$100,000 Total Annual Lease Payament = $100,000 + 4000 (Executory Costs) =$104000 Answer 2. Lessee and Lessor Criteria: 1. Title transfer? No 2. Bargain purchase option? No 3. Lease term ≥ 75% of asset useful life? No, it is 66.7% (4 ÷ 6) 4. PVMLP ≥ 90% FMV? Yes, it is 100% ($365,760 ÷$365,760) Additional Lessor Criteria 1. Collectibility of the minimum lease payments is reasonably assured?    Ye s 2. Any lessor costs yet to be incurred are reasonably predictible? Yes Therefore: Capital lease for lessee because it meets the 4th criterion. Direct financing lease for lessor. It meets the 4th criterion common to both the lessee and lessor, as well as both of the lessor specific criteria. It is direct financing because cost equals fair market value. Answer 3. Western Soya Co. (Lessee) Leased asset 365,760 Lease payable 365,760 Lease payable 100,000 Executory Cost 4,000 Cash 100,000 Rhone-Metro (Lessor) Lease receivable 365,760 Equipment 365,760 Cash 104,000 Lease receivable 100,000 Executory Cost 4000
 Answer 4. Both will use the same table: Date Payment Interest @10% Principal Balance 12/31/2016 0 365,760 12/31/2016 100,000 - 100,000 265,760 12/31/2017 100,000 26,576 73,424 192,336 12/31/2018 100,000 19,234 80,766 111,570 12/31/2019 100,000 11,157 88,843 22,727 12/31/2020 25,000 2,273 22,727 -

## Related Solutions

##### Royal Ltd. manufactures equipment that is sold or leased. On 31 December 2017 Royal leased equipment...
Royal Ltd. manufactures equipment that is sold or leased. On 31 December 2017 Royal leased equipment to Water Ltd. for a non-cancelable lease term of three years ending 31 December 2020 at which time possession of leased asset will revert back to Royal Ltd. The equipment cost $300,000 to manufacture and has an expected useful life of six years. Its normal sales price (fair value) is$365,760. The residual value was guaranteed by Water Ltd. for \$10,000 at the end...