In: Nursing
Why do you think it is so important for researchers to follow published standards for research design and reporting in epidemiology? Review the hierarchy of scientific evidence. Are there any benefits to making decisions based upon low-quality (e.g. Level III) evidence?
Why do you think it is so important for researchers to follow published standards for research design and reporting in epidemiology?
Review the hierarchy of scientific evidence. Are there any benefits to making decisions based upon low-quality (e.g. Level III) evidence?
Level III corresponds to cohort study which has good impact as an evidence in many cases where RCT and their systematic review is impossible like in study of association of lung cancer and smoking.
Levels of evidence | Type of evidence |
level I | at least 1 RCT with proper randomization |
Level II.1 | well designed cohort or case control study |
Level II.2 | Time series comparisons or dramatic results from uncontrolled studies |
Level III | Expert opinions |
As per this lcriteria, Level III corresponds to experts opinions, which is not sufficient in finalising any decision in research , though those opinions are worthy enough to be considered.
Please do not hesitate to give thumbs up. Happy learning. all the best. Stay safe.