In: Finance
You need to consider two projects which have the following cash flows: Project A requires an initial investment of $10,000 and will generate net cash flows of $5,000 at the end of year 1, $6,000 at the end of year 2, $7,000 at the end of year 3, and $8,000 at the end of year 4. At the end of year 2, maintenance costs of $8,000 will have to be disbursed. Project B requires an initial investment of $15,500 and will generate starting at the end of each following year, net cash flows of $6,000 per year for 6 years. It will incur maintenance costs of $8,000 at the end of year 3.
Assume that the required return is 12% per annum for both projects.
i. Draw timeline showing the cash flows of projects A and B?
ii. Find the NPV of projects A and B?
iii. Which project should be chosen if Projects A and B are mutually exclusive? Explain.
iv. Which project should be chosen if the Projects A and B are completely independent? Explain.
v. Based on the cash flows of project A, explain why IRR is not an appropriate evaluation technique for this project?
Year | A | B |
0 | -10,000 | -15,500 |
1 | 5,000 | 6,000 |
2 | -2,000 | 6,000 |
3 | 7,000 | -2,000 |
4 | 8,000 | 6,000 |
5 | 6,000 | |
6 | 6,000 | |
NPV | $2,936.50 | $3,474.20 |
Cash Flows are shown in the table above. NPV can be calculated using the same function in excel or calculator with 12% discount rate.
iii) If projects are mutually exclusive, Project A is selected because because it has higher annualized benefit, which can be calculated using PMT function
For A, N = 4, I/Y = 12%, PV = 2,936.50, FV = 0 => Compute PMT = $966.80
For B, N = 6, I/Y = 12%, PV = 3,474.20, FV = 0 => Compute PMT = $845.02
iv) For completely independent projects, both projects should be selected as they have positive NPVs.
v) IRR is not appropriate because cash flows are non-conventional with outflows in the middle of the project lives. It will result in multiple IRR for such projects and hence, we do not use IRR to evaluate such projects.