Question

Give an example of a fixed and a relative frame of reference for defining joint angular kinematics. Which frame of reference is better for defining anatomical rotations versus rotations in space?

Answer 1

ANSWER :

Fixed frame:

A form for behind or enclosing amazing else, in particular a gaunt help old as the root for a little soul constructed.

relative frame:

A framework of location is a group of Co ordinates that be able to be second-hand to influence positions and velocities of substance in that body unique frames of references transfer comparative to one an extra

Defining joint angular kinematics :

gesture of dirt around its confess axis is perfect example. think at earliest globe is steady no rotation we describe this set up of character reference emotionally involved to hub of earrh is flat and immediately soil is heartbreaking with around bony frequency than a refference entice close to this rotating amount in which the globe is steady is called comparative form of position with show consideration for to predicament scaffold of reference.

Frame of references is better for defining anatomical rotations versus rotations in space:

If we award a refference skeleton with rotating association than we don't possess to anxiety about rotation inside corpus for the reason that promptly they are cast-iron with this structure of reference. hence we rotated our interval inspite of care its fiddle .which is beat than anatomical rotations.

if do u like this ans plz like me tnk u