Question

In: Finance

The City of G is considering building a light rail transit (LRT) system similar to the...

The City of G is considering building a light rail transit (LRT) system similar to the one recently constructed in City KW. You have been asked to conduct a cost benefit analysis of the project. You have some data about the KW LRT project:

Present value of annual net benefits (to KW residents) =$620 million

Construction costs (paid by KW residents) (t=0) =$820 million

Grant from the provincial government (t=0) =$300 million

Grant from the federal government (t=0) =$250 million

A KW analyst estimated the net present value of the project for KW to be +$350 million. An independent analyst argued that the net present value was closer to -$200 million. Define the concept of “standing” and use this concept to help explain the difference in the net present value estimates.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Concept of Standing basically involves the question of "who has standing" and is used to measure the impact on all stakeholders who have significant investment into the project. In this case of grants from Provincial and Federal Government but benefits accruing to only the region of KW, it beomes comple to determine who has standing.

For KW residents specifically,

Benefits accrued = 620M

But Cost to KW Residents = $820M- $300M-$250M = $270M

Hence, any Analyst from KW will only consider the cash flows invested by the KW residents for any form of cost benefit analysis, making the net present value to 620M- 270M= 350M

350M is NPV standing from the point of view of KW Residents.

Now, from the standing of an independent analyst, he will only consider the inflow and outflow for the Project only. Think about it as if independent analyst is standing in from the point of view of Federal Government - As Federal Government is in some sense paying the amount granted by Provincial Government (since it ultimaltely comes fom taxes paid by KW citizens in some form or other) as well as the cost paid by KW citizens, the total cost borne by the Government for the Project is 820M and benefits acrrued are only 620M,

Hence, from the standing of an independent view: net npv = 620M- 820M= -200M

This explains the difference in NPV because of observation from different standing points.


Related Solutions

Mitsubishi Corp. signs a contract to sell a fleet of light-rail-transit (LRT) vehicles to the Region...
Mitsubishi Corp. signs a contract to sell a fleet of light-rail-transit (LRT) vehicles to the Region of Waterloo for $450 million. Mitsubishi also contracted to maintain the LRT vehicles for $45 million for the 24 ensuing months after the LRT was delivered. Instructions Mitsubishi is a public company and adhere to asset-liability approach (or contracts-based approach) as adopted by IFRS 15. Assuming all the LRT vehicles are delivered at the same time, illustrate the five steps in the revenue recognition...
Assume that Bombardier Inc. signs a contract to sell light-rail-transit (LRT) vehicles to the Region of...
Assume that Bombardier Inc. signs a contract to sell light-rail-transit (LRT) vehicles to the Region of Waterloo for a total price of $ 15 million. Included is a two year extended warranty valued at $1,500,000. Without the extended warranties the vehicles would sell for $14,000,000. Instructions Using this transaction as an example, illustrate the five steps in the revenue recognition process for Bombardier (State the step and use the information in the question to discuss / comment on the step...
The City of Boston is considering adding new buses for its current mass-transit system that links...
The City of Boston is considering adding new buses for its current mass-transit system that links from the Hartsfield International Airport to major city destinations on a nonstop basis. The total investment package is worth $6 million and expected to last 9 years with a $840,000 salvage value. The annual operating and maintenance costs for buses would be $1 million during the first year, and will grow by 7% each year over the previous year thereafter. If the system is...
Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail cars from...
Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail cars from a manufacturer in Germany for 5,000,000 €. The purchase is made in June today with payment due six months later in December. Because this is a sizable contract for the firm and because the contract is in € rather than $, CVT is considering several hedging alternatives to reduce the exchange rate risk arising from the sale. To help the firm make a hedging...
Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail cars from...
Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail cars from a manufacturer in Germany for 5,000,000 €. The purchase is made in June today with payment due six months later in December. Because this is a sizable contract for the firm and because the contract is in € rather than $, CVT is considering several hedging alternatives to reduce the exchange rate risk arising from the sale. To help the firm make a hedging...
Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail cars from...
Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail cars from a manufacturer in Germany for 5,000,000 €. The purchase is made in June today with payment due six months later in December. Because this is a sizable contract for the firm and because the contract is in € rather than $, CVT is considering several hedging alternatives to reduce the exchange rate risk arising from the sale. To help the firm make a hedging...
Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail cars from...
Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail cars from a manufacturer in Germany for 5,000,000 €. The purchase is made in June today with payment due six months later in December. Because this is a sizable contract for the firm and because the contract is in € rather than $, CVT is considering several hedging alternatives to reduce the exchange rate risk arising from the sale. To help the firm make a hedging...
PROBLEM 1) Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail...
PROBLEM 1) Central Valley Transit Inc. (CVT) has just signed a contract to purchase light rail cars from a manufacturer in Germany for 5,000,000 €. The purchase is made in June today with payment due six months later in December. Because this is a sizable contract for the firm and because the contract is in € rather than $, CVT is considering several hedging alternatives to reduce the exchange rate risk arising from the sale. To help the firm make...
A city is deciding whether it makes sense to invest in a light rail line. Engineers...
A city is deciding whether it makes sense to invest in a light rail line. Engineers have projected that if the rail line were to be built, once completed it would reduce travel time for 2,000 commuters by 60 minutes per day (for each workday). The line will take four years to build. The costs of construction are projected to equal $25,000,000 per year, and the costs of operating the line are assumed to equal $2,000,000 per year. Assume that...
A light-rail transportation project is proposed to connect the centre of a city to a growing suburban neighbourhood.
  A light-rail transportation project is proposed to connect the centre of a city to a growing suburban neighbourhood. The project is expected to cost $480 million for construction, right-of-way purchase, and traffic control systems. Half the cost must be allocated at the beginning of the project and the other half is paid upon construction completion. Construction is expected to take two years. The useful life of this project is 20 years after construction is completed. Operation and maintenance cost...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT