Question

Case Study: A Tale of Two Classes

Ebony Ellis has two communication classes back-to-back in the same room, but they couldn’t be more different. The first, a class on interpersonal communication, is taught by Steve Gardner, an older professor who has taught at the university for 20 years. The first day of class he verbally explained the rules for class conduct, which were also distributed in a printed handout—cell phones off, no texting, and, unless a student needs to use one for taking notes, laptops closed. Class starts on time and ends on time, and students should try not to leave early. Ebony’s second class, an organizational communication course taught by Marissa Morgan, a younger professor in her 40s, has different rules. There aren’t any. This professor doesn’t care if the students use their laptops during class. Texting and talking are unrestrained. Professor Morgan announced on the first day that all students are responsible for their own learning in the class, and she trusts them to know how they learn best. When students walk in late or leave early, she always says hello or goodbye to them. Ebony likes her interpersonal communication class a lot. Professor Gardner’s manner has succeeded in getting the class of 75 students to engage with him and listen to one another. Personal disclosures by students and the professor alike are frequent, and there is often much humor and laughter. Even though it is a large class, most people know each other’s names, as does Professor Gardner. Many of the students do things with each other outside of class. In his course, students write a reflection paper every other week, and they have a midterm and final exams.

The atmosphere in the organizational communication class is strikingly different to Ebony. It is spontaneous and uncontrolled. Sometimes professor Morgan lectures, but most of the time she just comes to class and invites students to discuss whatever they want to talk about. Students do not know each other’s names and seldom connect with each other outside of class. Professor Morgan also assigns papers, but they are short, personal observation papers that aren’t given grades but are marked as turned in or not. Students’ final grades for the class are dependent on a presentation each student must give on an interpersonal communication topic of his or her choice. Ebony thinks the two differing styles of the professors would make a great topic for her organizational communication class presentation. To get more information, she interviews both instructors to learn why their classroom management styles are so different. Professor Gardner describes his teaching philosophy this way: “I want students to think that this class is unique and the subject is important and has value. I know all students by name, and I allow them to call me by my first name or my title. I really want them to be on board with the direction the train is going from the start. I try to build a community by getting the students to listen to one another. The fun and spirit of the class comes from the camaraderie they establish. In order to listen to one another, however, they have to be fully present. To be fully present, they have to be paying full attention. Texting and open laptops suggest to me that the students are disassociated and disconnected from the group. The attention is on self, rather than the community.” Professor Morgan says her goal is to be sure to cover the required course content and still enjoy the teaching experience. “I give the students just enough freedom in class that they will either sink or swim. This freedom allows me to present my ideas, and then they are free to discuss them as they wish. I think today’s students are so multifaceted that they can find their own way to learn, even if it involves texting or using their laptops during class. Many times a student will bring up something valuable that he or she has found while surfing the Internet during class that really adds to our discussions. As I see it, my role as a professor is to present the material to be learned, while the students are responsible for how much of it they can absorb.” Ebony also interviewed two students, like herself, who are enrolled in both classes. Ian said he is very pleased with Professor Gardner’s class because he knows what is expected of him and what the norms for class behavior are, noting “He’s the only prof at the U who knows my name.” Professor Gardner’s grading structure is similar to that of most other classes Ian has had, and he likes that there are several graded assignments that allow him to know how he is doing through the course of the semester. As for Professor Morgan’s class, he thinks it is “OK” but finds it distracting when people are texting in class. Ian is also stressed about his grade being dependent on one big assignment. Professor Gardner’s class is also BreeAnn’s favorite. She says that Professor Morgan’s class feels “a little wild,” the discussions are not controlled by the professor so the class does not stay on topic, and you learn very little. While Professor Morgan writes thoughtful comments on each of their papers, it is unclear how the papers are related to her lectures and more importantly the student’s final grade. BreeAnn finds the final presentation assignment to be an interesting challenge but irrelevant to the class and her major. “They are both good,” Ian says, “just very, very different.”

Questions

In establishing a constructive climate for his or her class, what kind of structure has each professor put in place?

How would you describe the group norms for each class?

What actions has each professor taken to establish cohesiveness in his or her class?

What standards of excellence has each professor established for his or her course?

Which class atmosphere would you do best in? Why?

Answer 1

In establishing a constructive environment or climate, both the Professors have made a structure known best to them. While Prof Gardener has set- up a more interactive and participative environment, Prof Morgan has a set-up an environment which is less controlled and liberal. Both the approaches are different and quite opposite to each other.

In Prof Gardener’s class, the students are given a set of instruction where they cannot use internet, laptop, phone, etc. Texting during class hours are not allowed. Such independent variables are controlled which is a good thing as it will stop the students from getting distracted. On the other hand, humour and laughter is allowed giving the students the liberty to open up. So there is participation as well as interaction from the students. Prof Gardener puts in a feeling of importance among the students as he makes sure he knows each of the student’s name. The students feel the need to interact with each other outside the class as they are closely knit with each other. This happens due to the participative environment setup by Prof Gardener. Prof Gardener has several grading assignments for his students so that they understand how they are progressing through the course. It is important that when we are in a class, we need to have our focus and concentration in place to understand and grasp the subject better. That is exactly what Prof Gardener strives for. He creates the right setup of cohesiveness for his students.

On the other hand, in Prof Morgan’s class, the students are not given any instructions rather a free approach. The students can use their laptops, phone and are free to do whatever they like during class hours. Further, there is no systematic approach to the grading system. This pushes the students to be disinterested in the class and its work. Further they do not know each other’s name and there is no recognition or bonding among them leading to more of individual concern and less rather no team work. There is absolutely no participation or interaction in the class making it to be a distracted setup lacking in focus and concentration. There is no control in such a setup which leads to a disoriented environment. Students are lost, distracted, and disinterested in such a setup by Prof Morgan. Prof Morgan has failed to create a level of cohesiveness among her students. The students do not value the subject and are completely disoriented.   

For me, it would be Prof Gardener’s class setup where I believe I would have the best of me. This is because, Prof Gardener’s classroom is free of distraction and is quite controlled on the variables that can hamper my productivity during the class hours. I would have a feeling of being in group because there is participation and interaction as well humour and laughter. So basically, there is a feeling of team work and the need to interact with each other beyond the classroom setup. Further a Professor knowing me personally and calling me by my name gives an added recognition which would help me in connecting with the class.