In: Operations Management
Communication Case Study
Mike's Missed Step
Today was going to be a big day for Mike. He finally had a chance
to show management that he had some good ideas about how the
company could be improved. Because of a new policy allowing
employees to submit written suggestions for changes to top
management, he planned to send a memo to the president for
consideration. Having worked in the stockroom for three years, he
had seen the great amount of time wasted by pulling supplies on
numerous orders and handing them to individual employees at the
front window. He thought that if the departments obtained all
supplies at the same time on one order, the company could save
stockroom personnel time, speed up distribution of supplies, reduce
paperwork, and lessen the need for overtime.
Knowing that his suggestion had to be received before the 9 a.m.
management meeting, Mike hurriedly prepared an e-mail and sent it
without proofing it or asking someone else to read it. After he
sent it, he called the president's secretary to make sure she gave
it to the president before the meeting. The e-mail the president
received said, “Want to save a lot of money? Have everyone come get
their supplies at the same time and not waste so much of my
time.”
Mike eagerly waited for some response to his recommendation.
Finally, he received a brief written memo thanking him for his
suggestion and stating that, after consideration, management had
decided not to make a change. He later learned that management
didn't consider his proposal because they didn't understand it.
They thought he was recommending that everyone, including managers,
go to the supply room at a certain time to retrieve whatever
supplies they needed (rather than, as Mike intended, having one
departmental staff member pick up supplies for all department
members on one order).
Amazed, Mike said, “What? I told them what I thought would work.
Why didn't they understand?”
1. What happened? Why didn't the managers understand what Mike was recommending?
2. How could he have handled this situation better?
3. Rewrite Mike's message so that it is complete, concise, correct, clear, and courteous
1. Mike's communication was insufficient. It did not comprise of a detailed report or an explanation of the current state and the proposed future state. How efficiency could be increased and wastes of waiting, motion, inventory, etc. could be reduced or eliminated. A detailed description of his proposal for improvement was not provided in the short e-mail. Thus, his key idea didn't even reach the management.
2. Firstly, he should work on his presentation skills. A present value stream map and a future value stream map of the process could have added extra weightage. Further, he must not take the opportunity lightly and must invest sufficient time presenting his idea. Further, he could have taken a co-workers help, one whom he may trust to be more efficient and have greater control over the soft skills and presentation skills. Further, must have proof read and ensured there are no flaws or grammatical errors.
3. "Currently, all the stationary and office supplies arrive at the stockroom and individual employees come to take their required supplies. The frequency of transactions is very high. This is time consuming as well as tedious.
Instead, I propose that one representative from each department could collect order for the entire team. Thus, reducing paperwork, saving time and improving time efficiency. Besides this, the saved time would mean the stockroom personnel would not have to do overtime and that supplies would be handed over to the respective teams effectively.