Question

In: Economics

Assume that both Altoa and Calcoa emit 400 tonnes of pollution while producing bauxite. Suppose both...

Assume that both Altoa and Calcoa emit 400 tonnes of pollution while producing bauxite. Suppose both firms have tradable permits that allow each to emit 200 tonnes of pollution. If it costs $5,000 and $6,000 for Altoa and Calcoa to eliminate 200 tonnes of pollution respectively, what will likely happen in the market for tradable permits?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Initially both Altoa and Calcoa emit 400 tons of pollution. So, initially 800 tons of pollution is produced in total.

Now both the firms are given the permit of producing only 200 tons of pollution. This means that both the firms still need to reduce 200 tons of pollution each. As the $5000 for Altoa to eliminate 200 tons of pollution and $6000 for Calcoa to eliminate 200 tons of pollution, Calcoa would like to buy the tradable permit of 200 tons of pollution from Altoa for a price greater than $5000 but less than $6000. By doing this, Calcoa would not have to reduce the pollution and will buy the permit at a lower cost than eliminating it. On the other hand, Altoa would have to reduce extra 200 tonnes of pollution for $5000 but would receive more than $5000 for selling the permit. In this way, both the firms Altoa and Caltoa have made profit by trading permits.

IF YOU FIND THIS ANSWER HELPFUL, PLEASE UP VOTE.


Related Solutions

Suppose there are two paper mills on an island. Both mills produce air pollution that is...
Suppose there are two paper mills on an island. Both mills produce air pollution that is non-rival and non-excludable. All of the island’s citizens are negatively affected by the air pollution, but Children and Adults are affected differently. Specifically, the marginal benefits of pollution abatement (A) to the Child population is given by MBChild = 162 − 3A and the marginal benefits of pollution abatement to the Adult population is given by MBAdult = 108−2A. Not surprisingly, pollution abatement is...
Suppose there are two paper mills on an island. Both mills produce air pollution that is...
Suppose there are two paper mills on an island. Both mills produce air pollution that is non-rival and non-excludable. All of the island’s citizens are negatively affected by the air pollution, but Children and Adults are affected differently. Specifically, the marginal benefits of pollution abatement (A) to the Child population is given by MBChild = 162 − 3A and the marginal benefits of pollution abatement to the Adult population is given by MBAdult = 108−2A. Not surprisingly, pollution abatement is...
Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption)...
Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption) help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, producing, buying and driving a car do generate greenhouse gas emissions. Based on this information, for each economic activity, first discuss whether there is externality and what type of externality it is and explain why (e.g., production/consumption of cars/bicycles leads to positive/negative/no production/consumption externality because … … …). When explaining your reasoning, make sure you relate your...
Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption)...
Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption) help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, producing, buying and driving a car do generate greenhouse gas emissions. Based on this information, for each economic activity, first discuss whether there is externality and what type of externality it is and explain why(e.g., production/consumption of cars/bicycles leads to positive/negative/no production/consumption externality because … … …). When explaining your reasoning, make sure you relate your specific...
Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption)...
Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption) help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, producing, buying and driving a car do generate greenhouse gas emissions. Based on this information, for each economic activity, first discuss whether there is externality and what type of externality it is and explain why (e.g., production/consumption of cars/bicycles leads to positive/negative/no production/consumption externality because … … …). When explaining your reasoning, make sure you relate your...
Suppose a farm couple has the option to purchase 400 acres of land. Assume they are...
Suppose a farm couple has the option to purchase 400 acres of land. Assume they are able to purchase the land for $4,000/acre. Assume a 25% down payment with the balance financed by a 30 year loan with a 7% interest rate and equal annual principal payments. What will their interest change in year 2 be? a. $40,000 b. $84,000 c. $78,400 d. $81,200
Suppose that France and Germany both produce rye and shoes. France's opportunity cost of producing a...
Suppose that France and Germany both produce rye and shoes. France's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is 4 bushels of rye while Germany's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is 10 bushels of rye. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing shoes in the two countries, you can tell that (France, Germany) has a comparative advantage in the production of shoes and (France, Germany)  has a comparative advantage in the production of rye. Suppose that France...
Suppose that Spain and Switzerland both produce beer and cheese. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a...
Suppose that Spain and Switzerland both produce beer and cheese. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a pound of cheese is 5 barrels of beer while Switzerland's opportunity cost of producing a pound of cheese is 10 barrels of beer. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing cheese in the two countries, you can tell that (Spain/Switzerland) has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese and (Spain/Switzerland) has a comparative advantage in the production of beer. Suppose that Spain and...
Suppose that Spain and Denmark both produce beer and wine. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a...
Suppose that Spain and Denmark both produce beer and wine. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 3 barrels of beer while Denmark's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 11 barrels of beer. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing wine in the two countries, you can tell that (Spain,Denmark) has a comparative advantage in the production of wine and (Spain, Denmark) has a comparative advantage in the production of beer. Suppose that Spain...
Suppose that Spain and Denmark both produce oil and wine. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a...
Suppose that Spain and Denmark both produce oil and wine. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 4 barrels of oil while Denmark's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 11 barrels of oil. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing wine in the two countries, you can tell that [ ] has a comparative advantage in the production of wine and [ ] has a comparative advantage in the production of oil. Suppose that...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT