Question

In: Economics

Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption)...

Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption) help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, producing, buying and driving a car do generate greenhouse gas emissions. Based on this information, for each economic activity, first discuss whether there is externality and what type of externality it is and explain why (e.g., production/consumption of cars/bicycles leads to positive/negative/no production/consumption externality because … … …). When explaining your reasoning, make sure you relate your specific answer to the definition of externalities. Then, for each economic activity given above (e.g., production/consumption of cars/bicycles), compare private costs and benefits with the true cost and benefit to society

Solutions

Expert Solution

Bicycle case :

There is no externality in production . This means that production of bicycles has no effect on third party who are not involved in this production process or no harm on environment around is caused . Consumption of bicycles causes generation of positive externality . This is because due to greenhouse gas emission reduction the benefit to society of using a bicycle exceed the benefits enjoyed by the individual consumers of the bicycle . There is a benefit to third party for an economic transaction or consumption . The marginal social benefit is higher than marginal pivate benefit , hence social optimum outcome is higher than market equilibrium outcome . As for example another good that produces positive externality to society is education .

Car case :

Here both production and consumption of car causes negative externality . This is because producing, buying and driving a car do generate greenhouse gas emissions . There is externality is production which means marginal social cost is higher than private marginal cost of production , if this externality is accounted for then supply of cars fall because socially optimum quantity produced is lower than market production . Externality in production affects the supply curve . Same happens during consumption . Someone buying and using a car causes adverse effects on other by polluting environment , which is is negative externality in consumption , the private benefit is higher than social benefit from car consumption . Externality in consumption affects the demand curve . The social optimum is lower than free market equilibrium when externality is internalized .


Related Solutions

Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption)...
Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption) help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, producing, buying and driving a car do generate greenhouse gas emissions. Based on this information, for each economic activity, first discuss whether there is externality and what type of externality it is and explain why (e.g., production/consumption of cars/bicycles leads to positive/negative/no production/consumption externality because … … …). When explaining your reasoning, make sure you relate your...
Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption)...
Suppose that producing a bicycle generates no environmental degradation, while buying and riding a bicycle (consumption) help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, producing, buying and driving a car do generate greenhouse gas emissions. Based on this information, for each economic activity, first discuss whether there is externality and what type of externality it is and explain why(e.g., production/consumption of cars/bicycles leads to positive/negative/no production/consumption externality because … … …). When explaining your reasoning, make sure you relate your specific...
Suppose any environmental degradation arising from the US consumption of energy was subject to a Pigovian...
Suppose any environmental degradation arising from the US consumption of energy was subject to a Pigovian tax (a tax on consumption where the tax paid fully covered the environmental damage). For the purposes of a macroeconomic model, you may assume a Pigovian tax on consumption will reduce consumption, so you can model it as an autonomous decline in consumption. Starting from an initial macroeconomic equilibrium at full employment output, trace out the short run and long run adjustment to this...
You are thrown from a bicycle while riding at speed on a gravel road. Immediately you...
You are thrown from a bicycle while riding at speed on a gravel road. Immediately you start bleeding from several places where the gravel cut through your epidermis into your dermis and broke numerous blood vessels. Your body's first response to this injury is to begin the process known as [a]. This process has three steps. [b]: the [e] in the tunica media of your damaged blood vessels begins to contract, [f] blood flow to this portion of vessel, in...
Suppose you start riding your bicycle from rest, and the wheels reach an angular speed of...
Suppose you start riding your bicycle from rest, and the wheels reach an angular speed of 354 rpm in 5.4 seconds. How many complete revolutions do the wheels make in this time?
Suppose a closed economy has an aggregate consumption function given by C = 200 + 0.50Yd and generates $2400 output and income in equilibrium
2Suppose a closed economy has an aggregate consumption function given by C = 200 + 0.50Yd and generates $2400 output and income in equilibrium. Suppose also that the government collects a lump-sum tax of 100.How much will the private sector be saving total in equilibrium?3Suppose a closed economy generates $2500 output and income in equilibrium. Suppose also that the government spends 350 and imposes a lump-sum tax of 100.By how much is the government in deficit?
Assume that both Altoa and Calcoa emit 400 tonnes of pollution while producing bauxite. Suppose both...
Assume that both Altoa and Calcoa emit 400 tonnes of pollution while producing bauxite. Suppose both firms have tradable permits that allow each to emit 200 tonnes of pollution. If it costs $5,000 and $6,000 for Altoa and Calcoa to eliminate 200 tonnes of pollution respectively, what will likely happen in the market for tradable permits?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT