Question

In: Economics

Suppose there are two paper mills on an island. Both mills produce air pollution that is...

Suppose there are two paper mills on an island. Both mills produce air pollution that is non-rival and non-excludable. All of the island’s citizens are negatively affected by the air pollution, but Children and Adults are affected differently. Specifically, the marginal benefits of pollution abatement (A) to the Child population is given by MBChild = 162 − 3A and the marginal benefits of pollution abatement to the Adult population is given by MBAdult = 108−2A. Not surprisingly, pollution abatement is costly for both paper mills. For Mill 1, marginal abatement costs are given by MAC1 = 12A and for Mill 2, MAC2 = 6A. Suppose there are no enforcement costs associated with ensuring that polluters comply with any abatement regulations. Using this information, answer the following questions.

Part (a) Aggregating benefits for Children and Adults, what is the marginal social benefit (MSB) function for pollution abatement? Graphically illustrate marginal benefits for Children (labeling it MBC), Adults (labeling it MBA), and the two combined (labeling it MSB).

Part (b) Aggregating costs for Mill 1 and Mill 2, what is the marginal social cost (MSC) function for pollution abatement? Graphically illustrate marginal costs for Mill 1 (labeling it MAC1), Mill 2 (labeling it MAC2), and the two combined (labeling it MSC).

Part (c) In the absence of regulation and bargaining, how much pollution will each Mill choose to abate?

Part (d) What is the socially optimal level of pollution abatement? Show this graphically, making sure to label the MSB and MSC curves as well as all intercepts and the equilibrium.

Part (e) Suppose the government chooses to achieve the abatement goal you found in Part (d) using a flat-rate emissions tax. What emissions tax would induce an overall abatement level that would achieve this goal? Under this tax, how many units of pollution would Mill 1 choose to abate? How many units of pollution would Mill 2 choose to abate?

Part (f) Suppose instead that the government chooses to achieve the abatement goal you found in Part (d) using a flat-rate emissions subsidy. What emissions subsidy would induce an overall abatement level that would achieve this goal? Under this subsidy, how many units of pollution would Mill 1 choose to abate? How many units of pollution would Mill 2 choose to abate?

Part (g) Without doing the calculation, can you tell whether total market abatement costs under the tax will be lower than, equal to, or greater than total market abatement costs under the subsidy?

Part (h) Suppose it is discovered that pollution abatement is actually much more beneficial to children than we originally thought above. Suppose also that there are actually positive and sizable costs to enforcing pollution abatement regulations. Applying this new information, what can you say about the new socially optimal level of pollution relative to the level you found in Part (d)?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer: am answered with a-g only

A)

Aggregating benefits for children and adults, we obtain the marginal social benefit function for pollution abatement as:

MSB = MBChild + MBAdult

MSB =162 - 3A + 108 - 2A

MSB = 270 - 5A

B)

Aggregating costs for mill 1 and mill 2, we obtain the marginal social cost(MSC) function for pollution abatement as:

MAC1 = 12A

MAC2= 6A

MSC = MAC1 + MAC2

MSC = 12A+ 6A

MSC = 18A

C)

In the absence of regulation and bargaining, each mill will equate its marginal abatement cost to marginal social benefit:

For Mill1:

MSB = MAC1

i.e. 270 - 5A = 12A

=> 270 = 17A

=> A = 15.88 units

For Mill 2:

MSB = MAC2

i.e. 270 -5A = 6A

=> 270 = 11 A

=> A = 24.54 units

So, mill 1 will choose to abate 15.88 units and mill 2 will choose to abate 24.54 units.

D)

MAB( child)=162-3A

MAB(adult)=108-2A

Aggregate MAB=MAB(child)+MaB(adult)=270-5A

MAC1=12A1. A1=MAc1/12

MAC2=6A2. A2=MAc2/6

Aggregate MAC;A=A1+A2=3MAC/12=MAC/4

MAC=4A

Social efficient abatement is where Aggregate MB and Aggregate MAC si Equal,

270-5A=4A

270=9A

A=270/9=30

E)

aggregate MAC at optimal abatement=4*30=120

So emission tax =120 will lead to social optimal abatement.

Firm abate till Abatement cost is lower than emission tax because it will less costlier to abate than paying tax.

A1=120/12=10

A2=120/6=20

F)

The subsidy Equal to 120 will lead to social optimal abatement.

For each additional Abatement,firm will get 120 subsidy

The firm will keep abate till MAC is lower than subsidy, because firm will get additional Profit from subsidy .as soon as MAC rise 120 ,firm will get negitive cash flow from abatement.

G)

Because the Abatement amount is same in both taxes and subsidy scheme. So abatement cost to firm will be same for firms in both case,but eventually goverment is giving subsidy to firms ,so net cost to society of abatement is equal to difference of total subsidy and firm abatement cost ,which will be higher .

So subsidy scheme will be more costlier


Related Solutions

Suppose there are two paper mills on an island. Both mills produce air pollution that is...
Suppose there are two paper mills on an island. Both mills produce air pollution that is non-rival and non-excludable. All of the island’s citizens are negatively affected by the air pollution, but Children and Adults are affected differently. Specifically, the marginal benefits of pollution abatement (A) to the Child population is given by MBChild = 162 − 3A and the marginal benefits of pollution abatement to the Adult population is given by MBAdult = 108−2A. Not surprisingly, pollution abatement is...
4A. Consider two rubber companies, Firestone and Goodyear. Both companies create air pollution when they produce...
4A. Consider two rubber companies, Firestone and Goodyear. Both companies create air pollution when they produce rubber. The air pollution can be reduced by the firm, but the abatement comes at a cost. Specifically, MACF = 800 – 4eF, where eF = tons of emissions produced by Firestone MACG = 200 – eG, where eG = tons of emissions produced by Goodyear the government wants to use an effluent tax to reduce emissions to 200 tons. What is the optimal...
Your power plant on Gilligan’s Island is producing too much air pollution. The professor gives you...
Your power plant on Gilligan’s Island is producing too much air pollution. The professor gives you three choices for dealing with this problem: You can pay a pollution tax (Carbon Offsets) onetime of $13,000,000 immediately. You can close the plant and install a power cable from the mainland to the Island. That will cost you $1,000,000 at the end of this year, $3,000,000 at the end of next year and then $750,000 forever for maintenance. You can retrofit the plant...
Suppose two countries Mexico and Canada both produce two goods wheat and coffee, suppose the relative...
Suppose two countries Mexico and Canada both produce two goods wheat and coffee, suppose the relative price of wheat in Mexico is 2.5 but in Canada it is 0.5. If they both specialize based on comparative advantage and trade, what will be the range of possible global relative price of coffee that trade will converge to, providing both countries mutual gains from trade. Assuming the resource used in producing wheat and coffee is homogeneous, what will happen to the wheat...
Suppose there is a river on which are located several paper mills, each of which discharges...
Suppose there is a river on which are located several paper mills, each of which discharges pollutants into the water. Suppose somebody invents a new technology for treating this waste stream that, if adopted by the pulp mills, could substantially diminish emissions. What are the impacts of this invention on (a) the actual level of emissions and (b) the efficient level of emissions?
A researcher is interested in studying how smoking affects air pollution in rooms. Air pollution is...
A researcher is interested in studying how smoking affects air pollution in rooms. Air pollution is measured as the amount of suspended particulate matter. A random sample of 14 rooms in homes where there is no smokers, and a random sample of 22 rooms in homes where there is a smoker were selected. Assume that all necessary normality assumptions are met. Below are some summaries: mean standard deviation sample without smokers 5.2 2.3 sample with smokers 6.7 4.4 sample of...
Suppose the United States and Mexico both produce hamburgers and tacos. The combinations of the two...
Suppose the United States and Mexico both produce hamburgers and tacos. The combinations of the two goods that each country can produce in one day are presented in the table below. United States Mexico Hamburgers​ (in tons) Tacos​ (in tons) Hamburgers​ (in tons) Tacos​ (in tons) 0 144 0 120 80 96 8 80 160 48 16 40 240 0 24 0 Which country has an absolute advantage in producing​ tacos?  The United States Mexico .Which country has a comparative...
Suppose a pulp and paper mill emits pollution into a river upstream of a commercial fishing...
Suppose a pulp and paper mill emits pollution into a river upstream of a commercial fishing operation. The emissions from the mill damage the fishery by reducing the number of fish that can be caught. The mill benefits from emissions as these are a by-product of pulp and paper production. Explain why the pollution level under point (b) is not an efficient outcome.   What is the efficient level of pollution? Explain.
Suppose a pulp and paper mill emits pollution into a river upstream of a commercial fishing...
Suppose a pulp and paper mill emits pollution into a river upstream of a commercial fishing operation. The emissions from the mill damage the fishery by reducing the number of fish that can be caught. The mill benefits from emissions as these are a by-product of pulp and paper production. Describe two objections that have been raised about the usefulness of the Coase theorem.
Suppose the government decides to raise the gasoline tax as a way of reducing air pollution...
Suppose the government decides to raise the gasoline tax as a way of reducing air pollution and traffic congestion to their optimal levels. Which of the following describes why Pigovian taxes, such as gasoline tax, are unlike most other taxes?   Other taxes are typically used to cover general spending, but funds from corrective taxes can only be used to alleviate pollution   Corrective taxes bring the allocation of resources closer to the social optimum, and thus improve economic efficiency...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT