Question

In: Economics

Using act utilitarianism only, explain why it is morally wrong to renege on a legitimate personal...

Using act utilitarianism only, explain why it is morally wrong to renege on a legitimate personal debt.

Directions: Embedded in your double-spaced essay, include a single-spaced table similar to the one below in which you list and weigh the predominant benefits and burdens associated with loan non-payment. Then justify the judgment in terms of the majority of people affected.

Non-payment of a personal debt

Name

% of Population

Benefit

Burden

Scale (-5 to +10)

Stakeholder 1

Stakeholder 2

Etc.

Etc

Solutions

Expert Solution

Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, whether an action is morally right or wrong depends entirely on its consequences. An action is right if it brings about the best outcome of the choices available. Otherwise it is wrong. The Good is therefore things (goals, states of affairs) that are worth pursuing and promoting. Utilitarianism defines the Good as pleasure without pain. The Right are the moral rightness (or wrongness) of actions and policies. Consequentialists say that actions are Right when they maximize the Good. So, according to Utilitarianism, our one moral duty is to Maximize pleasure and minimize pain. Utilitarianism says that there is more to life than pleasure; knowledge, virtue and other things are important too. Utilitarianism requires that we consider everyone’s pleasure, not just our own.

The Three Generally Accepted Axioms of Utilitarianism State That

  • Pleasure, or happiness, is the only thing that has intrinsic value.
  • Actions are right if they promote happiness, and wrong if they promote unhappiness.
  • Everyone's happiness counts equally.

Imagine that Peter is an unemployed poor man in New York. Although he has no money, his family still depends on him; his unemployed wife (Sandra) is sick and needs $500 for treatment, and their little children (Ann and Sam) have been thrown out of school because they could not pay tuition fees ($500 for both of them). Peter has no source of income and he cannot get a loan; even John (his friend and a millionaire) has refused to help him. From his perspective, there are only two alternatives: either he pays by stealing or he does not. So, he steals $1000 from John in order to pay for Sandra’s treatment and to pay the tuition fees of Ann and Sam. One could say that stealing is morally wrong. Therefore, we will say that what Peter has done— stealing from John—is morally wrong.

Utilitarianism, however, will say what Peter has done is morally right. For utilitarians, stealing in itself is neither bad nor good; what makes it bad or good is the consequences it produces. In our example, Peter stole from one person who has less need for the money, and spent the money on three people who have more need for the money. Therefore, for utilitarians, Peter’s stealing from John (the “means”) can be justified by the fact that the money was used for the treatment of Sandra and the tuition fees of Ann and Sam (the “end”). This justification is based on the calculation that the benefits of the theft outweigh the losses caused by the theft. Peter’s act of stealing is morally right because it produced more good than bad. In other words, the action produced more pleasure or happiness than pain or unhappiness, that is, it increased net utility.

Utilitarians’ concern is how to increase net utility. Their moral theory is based on the principle of utility which states that “the morally right action is the action that produces the most good”. The morally wrong action is the one that leads to the reduction of the maximum good. Similarly, it is morally wrong to renege on a legitimate personal debt.


Related Solutions

Does act-utilitarianism conflict with commonsense judgments about rights? Why or why not?
Does act-utilitarianism conflict with commonsense judgments about rights? Why or why not?
Which of the main approaches to health care do you prefer? Using act utilitarianism as a...
Which of the main approaches to health care do you prefer? Using act utilitarianism as a supporting reason.
1- why are Supererogatory actions a problem for Utilitarianism? Be sure to Explain what is supererogatory...
1- why are Supererogatory actions a problem for Utilitarianism? Be sure to Explain what is supererogatory actions and why is it problem? 2- What is the problem of Special Obligation? Be sure to Explain what special obligations are and why they are a problem of utilitarianism? In brief
Underline all the correct answers. Explain why an answer is correct or why it is wrong....
Underline all the correct answers. Explain why an answer is correct or why it is wrong. You are supposed to select all of the correct answers (1-6) for each roman numeral (I-III) --Please justify/explain answers thoroughly-- Problem 7. If photons with energy of 1.7 eV was applied to A Si Wafer is at 300k (Eg for Si =1.12eV), the valence and conduction band are (I) 1-      Both are completely empty 2-      Both are completely filled. 3-      Both are partially empty....
Eugenics Define negative and positive eugenics. Explain why positive eugenics is generally considered to be morally...
Eugenics Define negative and positive eugenics. Explain why positive eugenics is generally considered to be morally worse than negative eugenics. Is positive eugenics always morally wrong? (State why you believe it is or it isn’t wrong.) Cite two eugenics programs (they can be historically accurate or made-up) and compare them morally. Discuss what makes one morally better than the other. Cite at least two specific factors that make the better eugenics program morally preferable. Be specific and detailed.
Select one advertisement that you think is morally problematic, explain the advertisement, and tell me why...
Select one advertisement that you think is morally problematic, explain the advertisement, and tell me why you think it is problematic.
Explain what is wrong with the following statement: At any given temperature, only a single phase...
Explain what is wrong with the following statement: At any given temperature, only a single phase with the lowest Gibbs free energy is observed.
Explain and define the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. Give reasons why you think this ethical...
Explain and define the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. Give reasons why you think this ethical theory has come to dominate ethical decisions in the contemporary world. Give two examples of utilitarianism. AND (this is the most important part) a) Provide a solid criticism of this ethical theory (why you think it is not a good way to think about ethical problems b) Defend utilitarianism against your critique
1. Explain and define the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. Give reasons why you think this...
1. Explain and define the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. Give reasons why you think this ethical theory has come to dominate ethical decisions in the contemporary world. Give two examples of utilitarianism. AND (this is the most important part) a. Provide a solid criticism of this ethical theory (why you think it is not a good way to think about ethical problems) b. Defend utilitarianism against your critique
the assignment is on pick any act, law or regulation only in british columbia and explain...
the assignment is on pick any act, law or regulation only in british columbia and explain what is wrong with it how can it be fixed which authority can change it what is the process to change it
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT