Question

In: Psychology

Does act-utilitarianism conflict with commonsense judgments about rights? Why or why not?

Does act-utilitarianism conflict with commonsense judgments about rights? Why or why not?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Act utilitarianism philosophy rest on principle that whether an action is right or wrong depends on consequence , i.e. action is right when it leads to greatest good for greater no. of people.

Whereas common sense judgement about right and wrong are different. They are a combination of consequences and means . Sometimes it is in conflict with act utilitarianism as it focuses more on immediate consequences rather than long term. Moreover , a conflict between two is also apparent when commonsense judgement emphasizes on means . For example , law prohibits abortion after 24 weeks of fetus keeping in view safety of mother and child both. Then a rape case victim is diagnosed of pregnancy after 24 weeks and she is not ready to give birth. In this case , common sense judgement would prefer to go for abortion as it is not a normal case a d victim will be forced to have trauma for lifetime. However , act utilitarianism will go as per law and not prefer for abortion as violating law will create lawlessness but law is necessary for greater good for greater number.


Related Solutions

Using act utilitarianism only, explain why it is morally wrong to renege on a legitimate personal...
Using act utilitarianism only, explain why it is morally wrong to renege on a legitimate personal debt. Directions: Embedded in your double-spaced essay, include a single-spaced table similar to the one below in which you list and weigh the predominant benefits and burdens associated with loan non-payment. Then justify the judgment in terms of the majority of people affected. Non-payment of a personal debt Name % of Population Benefit Burden Scale (-5 to +10) Stakeholder 1 Stakeholder 2 Etc. Etc
Which of the following is a true statement about Title VII of the Civil Rights Act...
Which of the following is a true statement about Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? A. The act protects employers from employee threats B. The act prohibits employers from discriminating against workers due to their age C. The act is enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor D. The act applies to organizations with 15 employees or more
Question 77: The Ethics of Care has many similarities to Question options: Rule Utilitarianism Act Utilitarianism...
Question 77: The Ethics of Care has many similarities to Question options: Rule Utilitarianism Act Utilitarianism Kant’s Categorical Imperative Rawls’s Theory of Justice Part B: Which of the following is not a reason why a feminist perspective has called for rethinking the history of ethics? Question options: Traditional ethics has excluded women’s voices. Traditional ethics stresses autonomous man and the ethics of strangers. Traditional ethics has not emphasized justice. Traditional ethics invalidates the priority of intimate relationships.
Identify the classes of employees protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Why was...
Identify the classes of employees protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Why was Affirmative Action put into place? Do you think Title VII and Affirmative Action are still necessary? Why or why not?
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects minorities from discrimination, but it does not protect people...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects minorities from discrimination, but it does not protect people with limited English language proficiency. a. True b. False
6.  The Civil Rights Act addresses discrimination in the workplace. a) What classes of workers does the...
6.  The Civil Rights Act addresses discrimination in the workplace. a) What classes of workers does the Federal Act protect? b) Some states have added additional protected classes of workers. Identify additional protected classes in New Jersey.
Are Communists covered by the Cival Rights Act?
Are Communists covered by the Cival Rights Act?
Do you think there is an inherent conflict between political rights and economic rights? Ought they...
Do you think there is an inherent conflict between political rights and economic rights? Ought they advance together at the same time, or should one be prioritized over the other?
Do you think there is an inherent conflict between political rights and economic rights? Ought they...
Do you think there is an inherent conflict between political rights and economic rights? Ought they advance together at the same time, or should one be prioritized over the other? Class; Values and ethics
Compare and contrast the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Ontario Human Rights Act. NEED...
Compare and contrast the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Ontario Human Rights Act. NEED ANSWER ASAP.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT