does statistical results ever upstage human judgement about statistical results

Expert Solution

Yes, it is possible that statistical results can upstage human judgement about statistical results

This is because there are number of hypothesis tests and analysis that can be performed statistically accurately than human judgement.

Human judgement about statistics might go wrong when it's close to acceptance and rejection of a value.

Also, human judgement can also be biased

orchestra answered 1 year ago

Question 1) About 90% of the gold ever mined throughout human history is still in circulation;...

Question 1) About 90% of the gold ever mined throughout human history is still in circulation; however, only about 55% of all the silver ever mined is still in circulation. Why do you think there is such a difference? Explain. Question 2) Categorize each of the following words or phrases as being associated with either open-pit mining (O) or underground mining methods (U) dust and sedimentation problems ["U", "O"] use drifts and stopes ...

why does epicteutus believe that "what upsets people is not things but their judgement about things"?

explain why HIV/AIDs results disorder in human body? how does HIV/AIDS bring about immune disorder?

Using an appropriate statistical test, conduct, analyze and interpret results. Does the presence of health insurance...

Using an appropriate statistical test, conduct, analyze and interpret results. Does the presence of health insurance impact obesity rates? Total under norm over obese 18–44 112,149 2,706 43,203 34,044 29,066 45–64 82,605 784 22,052 29,266 26,930 Private 129,666 2,046 45,107 42,921 35,348 Medicaid 23,239 618 6,952 6,384 8,303 Other 9,095 164 2,296 3,207 3,244 Uninsured 31,587 615 10,303 10,594 8,889

Does deflation ever happen?

Does deflation ever happen? ( The Great recession of United States of America)

Are human experiments ever justified? Discuss using examples and details.

Statistical Error: Horn/halo effect Definition: The tendency to allow one's judgement of another person to be...

Statistical Error: Horn/halo effect Definition: The tendency to allow one's judgement of another person to be unduly influenced by an unfavorable (horns) or favorable (halo) first impression. What is HR Decision to be made? Errors typically occur because the data used to make the decision is flawed in some way. What data should be used for this decision? How would this help avoid the error?

Bigger sample is not always better – one of the worst statistical mistakes ever made in...

Bigger sample is not always better – one of the worst statistical mistakes ever made in the history of statistics happened in the 1936 U.S. Presidential Election. The incumbent president Franklin Roosevelt of the Democratic Party and Alf Landon of the Republican Party are the two main presidential candidates. Look the event up at this webpage http://www.math.upenn.edu/~deturck/m170/wk4/lecture/case1.html and answer the following questions. Find the Literary Digest’s pre-election prediction for Roosevelt and Landon, in percentage of popularity vote. (One percentage for...

1. STATISTICAL RESULTS: Report and statistically interpret the results with an appropriate tabular format and text....

1. STATISTICAL RESULTS: Report and statistically interpret the results with an appropriate tabular format and text. See the Output B. [6 pt] 2. DISCUSSION: Discuss what the results imply. [2 pt] Output A. Descriptive statistics Statistics Exam Performance (%) Exam Anxiety N Valid 103 103 Missing 0 0 Mean 56.57 74.3437 Median 60.00 79.0440 Std. Deviation 25.941 17.18186 Minimum 2 1.00 Maximum 100 100.00 Output B. Simple Linear Regression Results Correlations Exam Performance (%) Exam Anxiety Pearson Correlation Exam Performance...

Determine whether the results appear to have statistical? significance, and also determine whether the results appear...

Determine whether the results appear to have statistical? significance, and also determine whether the results appear to have practical significance. In a study of a gender selection method used to increase the likelihood of a baby being born a? girl, 1903 users of the method gave birth to 936 boys and 967 girls. There is about a 25?% chance of getting that many girls if the method had no effect. Because there is a 25?% chance of getting that many...

Question