In: Finance
Please see attached file and the link below and respond to following questions:
1. Is climate change really a problem?
2. How much investment should firms really put into reducing emissions.
3. From a strategic standpoint, what are the practical implications of these changes/predicted changes?
Sea transport has a relatively green image because ships emit less carbon dioxide per tonne and per kilometre than rail, truck or air transport. Yet, given its scale and rapid growth, it’s a major source of carbon emissions. Maritime transport emits around 1,000 million tonnes of CO? a year and is responsible for about 2.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. The international law Despite being a major contributor to climate change, the powerful shipping industry has successfully lobbied to be excluded from obligations to reduce emissions under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and, more recently, the 2015 Paris Agreement. There are also no sector-wide emission reduction targets in maritime shipping under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). In other key policy spaces, such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), there are no obligations imposed on either states or shipping corporations to reduce maritime emissions. Countries could potentially set emissions targets domestically, but they rarely set sectoral targets, especially for sectors that are heavily exposed to international trade. In this context, the shipping industry has been particularly footloose in its response to climate change. It is therefore a cause for celebration that decades of negotiation have now yielded this agreement. The deal requires all IMO countries to reduce shipping emissions by 50% compared with 2008 levels. Ships will be required to be more energy-efficient and to use cleaner energy such as solar and wind electricity generation. Currently, the shipping industry is overwhelmingly reliant on dirty, carbon-rich fuels such as heavy diesel. Some stormy seas ahead The climate deal has been described as “historic”, but not all countries are on board. Some, particularly island nations that are vulnerable to sea level rise, wanted a “far, far more ambitious” target. Others, including the United States, Brazil, Panama and Saudi Arabia, are strongly against it. Reconciling these differences will be a difficult task for the IMO. It has always been technically difficult to accurately calculate the precise amount of fuel used during shipping operations. It’s even harder to allocate maritime emissions to specific countries. Contributing to the potential confusion is the use of “flags of convenience”. This is where a ship’s owners register the vessel in a country other than their own, and fly the flag of the country where registered. This is usually done to disguise the relationship between the vessel and its actual owner, due to the attractive, lower regulatory burdens that some open registries offer. Shipping corporations could also use flags of convenience to avoid mandatory emission reduction targets. The way forward As a result of the climate deal, states will eventually need to introduce domestic laws setting emission reduction targets for their shipping industry. These targets could also be applied to ships that call at their ports. The good news is that there is potential synergy between such regulation and existing laws, such as the European Union regulation that requires ship owners and operators to monitor, report and verify CO? emissions from certain vessels that dock at European ports. Read more: Five ways the shipping industry can reduce its carbon emissions The new climate deal has the potential to change the way shipping companies operate. It presents an opportunity for the shipping industry to become part of the solution rather than the problem when it comes to climate change. It’s also a strong signal to other international industries, such as the aviation sector, that have largely escaped emissions reduction targets. If we can reduce emissions in such a large and complex sector as marine transport, it bodes well for the capacity of international frameworks to tackle other difficult problems.
1 . Most climate scientists agree the main cause of the current global warming trend is human expansion of the "greenhouse effect"— warming that results when the atmosphere traps heat radiating from Earth toward space.
Certain gases in the atmosphere block heat from escaping. Long-lived gases that remain semi-permanently in the atmosphere and do not respond physically or chemically to changes in temperature are described as "forcing" climate change. Gases, such as water vapor, which respond physically or chemically to changes in temperature are seen as "feedbacks."
Gases that contribute to the greenhouse effect include:
Water vapour
Carbon dioxide
Methane
Nitrous oxide
Chlorofluorocarbons , etc...
The consequences of changing the natural atmospheric greenhouse are difficult to predict, but certain effects seem likely:
On average, Earth will become warmer. Some regions may welcome
warmer temperatures, but others may not.
Warmer conditions will probably lead to more evaporation and
precipitation overall, but individual regions will vary, some
becoming wetter and others dryer.
A stronger greenhouse effect will warm the oceans and partially
melt glaciers and other ice, increasing sea level. Ocean water also
will expand if it warms, contributing further to sea level
rise.
Meanwhile, some crops and other plants may respond favorably to
increased atmospheric CO2, growing more vigorously and using water
more efficiently. At the same time, higher temperatures and
shifting climate patterns may change the areas where crops grow
best and affect the makeup of natural plant communities.
2. There's no particular rule or a fixed amount which is fixed for investing in reducing the pollution . Its totally depends on the type of industry we are into. This have to be followed by the industry to minimize the level of emissions and pollution .
The investment should be made to the extent the pollution is controlled and do not create any harm to the environment and nature .
3. Coming to the practical implementation of these it should be considered an important task for a industry . There will be a innovative approach which willl reduce the emissions and reduces the harm to the atmosphere.
The rules and norms of pollution control board should be fulfilled.