In: Accounting
Process Co has two divisions, A and B. Division A produces three types of chemicals: products L, M and S, using a common process. Each of the products can either be sold by Division A to the external market at split-off point (after the common process is complete) or can be transferred to Division B for individual further processing into products LX, MX and SX.
In November 20X1, which is a typical month, Division A’s output was as follows:
Product Kg
L 1,200
M 1,400
S 1,800
The market selling prices per kg for the products, both at split-off point and after further processing, are as follows:
$ $
L 5.60 LX 6.70
M 6.50 MX 7.90
S 6.10 SX 6.80
The specific costs for each of the individual further processes are:
Variable cost of $0.50 per kg of LX
Variable cost of $0.70 per kg of MX
Variable cost of $0.80 per kg of SX
Further processing leads to a normal loss of 5% at the beginning of the process for each of the products being processed.
Required
It has been suggested that Division A should transfer products L and M to Division B for further processing, in order to optimise the profit of the company as a whole. Divisions A and B are both investment centres and all transfers from Division A to Division B would be made using the actual marginal cost. As a result, if Division A were to make the transfers as suggested, their divisional profits would be much lower than if it were to sell both products externally at split-off point. Division B’s profits, however, would be much higher.
Required
(b) Discuss the issues arising from this suggested approach to transfer pricing.
Impact on revenue of the company as a whole due to further processing and deciding the products to be further processed.
Division A
| Particulars | Product L | Product M | Product S |
| Units produced Division A | 1200 | 1400 | 1800 |
| Selling price per unit | $5.60 | $6.50 | $6.10 |
| Total Revenue To division A | $6,720.00 | $9,100.00 | $10,980.00 |
Division B
| Particulars | Product LX | Product MX | Product SX |
| Units transferred by Division A | 1200 | 1400 | 1800 |
| Less: -Normal loss (5%) | -60 | -70 | -90 |
| Units produced by division B | 1140 | 1330 | 1710 |
| Incremental Revenue per unit | |||
| Selling Price Division B | $6.70 | $7.90 | $6.80 |
| Less: - Variable cost of further processing | -$0.50 | -$0.70 | -$0.80 |
| Incremental Revenue per unit | $6.20 | $7.20 | $6.00 |
| Units produced by division B | 1140 | 1330 | 1710 |
| Incremental Revenue after further processing | $7,068.00 | $9,576.00 | $10,260.00 |
| Net Increase/(Decrease) in revenue due to further processing | $348.00 | $476.00 | ($720.00) |
It has been suggested that Division A should transfer products L and M to Division B for further processing, in order to optimize the profit of the company as a whole.Revenue due to further processing increases in product L and M but further processing of Product S decreases revenue hence Product S should be sold at split off point.
Transfers from Division A to Division B would be made using the actual marginal cost. As a result, if Division A were to make the transfers as suggested, their divisional profits would be much lower than if it were to sell both products externally at split-off point. Division B’s profits, however, would be much higher.