Distinguish artifact from a normal pressure tracing and indicate
re-positioning techniques to improve pressure measurements.
Distinguish artifact from a normal pressure tracing and indicate
re-positioning techniques to improve pressure measurements.
Solutions
Expert Solution
History of cardiac catheterisation “The cardiac catheter
was......the key in the lock”-Andre Cournand (1956) Cardiac
catheterization was first performed by Claude Bernard in
1844(horse) Stephen Hales – as first to do cardiac catheterisation
in animals(1711 on horse) Mueller RL et al. Am Heart J
1995;129:146.
Cardiac catheterisation in human • Werner Theodor Otto
Forssmann( August 1904 – June 1979) • First to do cardiac
catheterisation in human heart • Retrograde left heart
catheterization was first reported by Zimmerman, Scott & Becker
and Limon-Lason and Bouchard in 1950. Zimmerman HA, Scott RW,
Becker ND. Catheterization of the left side of the heart in man.
Circulation 1950;1:357.
Dynamic pressure monitoring • Dynamic blood pressure has been
of interest to physiologists and physicians • 1732- Stephen Hales
measured the blood pressure of a horse by using a vertical glass
tube
Fluid-filled standard catheter system • Proper equipments for
high quality catheterisation recordings • Coronary angiography:
smallest-bore catheters, 5F & even 4F • Complex hemodynamic
catheterization is optimally performed with larger-bore catheters
that yield high-quality hemodynamic data. To obtain proper
hemodynamic tracings, 6F or even 7F catheters may be required
Manifold system
Fluid-filled catheter is attached by means of a manifold to a
small-volume- displacement strain gauge type pressure transducer
Wheatstone bridge
Pressure Measurement Terminology • Natural frequency –
Frequency at which fluid oscillates in a catheter when it is tapped
– Frequency of an input pressure wave at which the ratio of
output/input amplitude of an undamaged system is maximal Grossman
W. Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention. 5th
Edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1996. Shorter catheter
Larger catheter lumen Lighter fluid Higher natural frequency
Damping • Dissipation of the energy of oscillation of a
pressure management system, due to friction Greater fluid viscosity
Smaller catheter radius Less dense fluid Greater damping
Damped natural frequency • Frequency oscillations in the
catheter when friction losses are taken into account Natural
frequency = Damping à System critically damped Natural frequency
< Damping à OVERdamped Natural frequency > Damping à
UNDERdamped
Less damping à greater artifactual recorded pressure overshoot
above true pressure when pressure changes suddenly More damping à
less responsive to rapid alterations in pressure
Sensitivity • Ratio of amplitude of the recorded signal to the
amplitude of the input signal
Optimal damping can maintain frequency response flat
(output/input ratio = 1) to 88% of the natural frequency of the
system
Frequency response • Ratio of output amplitude to input
amplitude over a range of frequencies of the input pressure wave •
Frequency response of a catheter system is dependent on catheter’s
natural frequency and amount of damping • The higher the natural
frequency of the system, the more accurate the pressure measurement
at lower physiologic frequencies Grossman W. Cardiac
Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention. 7th Edition.
What is the optimal frequency response? • The essential
physiologic information is contained within the first 10 harmonics
of the pressure wave's Fourier series • The useful frequency
response range of commonly used pressure measurement systems is
usually <20 Hz • Frequency response was flat to <10 Hz with
small-bore (6F) catheters
Reflected waves • Both pressure and flow at any given location
are the geometric sum of the forward and backward waves
FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE MAGNITUDE OF REFLECTED WAVES
Sources of Error • Tachycardia Ø If pulse is too fast for
natural frequency of system, the fidelity of the recording will
drop. Ø Pulse = 120 à 10th harmonic = 20 Hz à Damped natural
frequency should be at least 60 Hz • Sudden changes in pressure •
Deterioration in frequency response • Catheter whip artifact •
End-pressure artifact • Catheter impact artifact • Systolic
pressure amplification in the periphery • Errors in zero level,
balancing, calibration
Sources of Error • Tachycardia • Sudden changes in pressure Ø
Peak LV systole, trough early diastole, catheter bumping against
wall of valve Ø Artifact seen due to under damping • Deterioration
in frequency response • Catheter whip artifact • End-pressure
artifact • Catheter impact artifact • Systolic pressure
amplification in the periphery • Errors in zero level, balancing,
calibration
Sources of Error • Tachycardia • Sudden changes in pressure •
Deterioration in frequency response Ø Introduction of air or
stopcocks permits damping and reduces natural frequency by serving
as added compliance Ø When natural frequency of pressure system and
low frequency components falls, high frequency components of the
pressure waveform (intraventricular pressure rise and fall) may set
the system into oscillation, producing “pressure overshoots” in
early systole & diastole • Catheter whip artifact •
End-pressure artifact • Catheter impact artifact • Systolic
pressure amplification in the periphery • Errors in zero level,
balancing, calibration
Sources of Error • Tachycardia • Sudden changes in pressure •
Deterioration in frequency response • Catheter whip artifact Ø
Motion of the catheter within heart or large vessels accelerates
fluid in catheter and produces superimposed waves of ± 10 mm Hg Ø
Common in pulmonary arteries & unavoidable • End-pressure
artifact • Catheter impact artifact • Systolic pressure
amplification in the periphery • Errors in zero level, balancing,
calibration
Sources of Error • Tachycardia • Sudden changes in pressure •
Deterioration in frequency response • Catheter whip artifact •
End-pressure artifact Ø Pressure from endhole catheter pointing
upstream is artifactually elevated. When blood flow is halted at
tip of catheter, kinetic energy is converted in part to pressure.
Added pressure may range 2-10 mm Hg. Ø When endhole catheter is
oriented into the stream of flow, the “suction” can lower pressure
by up to 5% • Catheter impact artifact • Systolic pressure
amplification in the periphery • Errors in zero level, balancing,
calibration
Sources of Error • Tachycardia • Sudden changes in pressure •
Deterioration in frequency response • Catheter whip artifact •
End-pressure artifact • Catheter impact artifact Ø Pressure
transient produced by impact on the fluid-filled catheter by an
adjacent structure (i.e. heart valve) Ø Any frequency component of
this transient that coincides with the natural frequency of the
catheter manometer system will cause a superimposed oscillation on
the recorded pressure wave Ø Common with pigtail catheters in the
left ventricular chamber, where the terminal pigtail may be hit by
the mitral valve leaflets as they open • Systolic pressure
amplification in the periphery • Errors in zero level, balancing,
calibration
Sources of Error • Tachycardia • Sudden changes in pressure •
Deterioration in frequency response • Catheter whip artifact •
End-pressure artifact • Catheter impact artifact • Systolic
pressure amplification in the periphery Ø Consequence of reflected
wave Ø Peripheral arterial systolic pressure commonly 20 mm Hg
higher than central aortic pressure (mean pressure same or slightly
lower) Ø Masks pressure gradients in LV or across aortic valve Ø
Use of a double-lumen catheter (e.g., double-lumen pigtail) or
trans-septal technique with a second catheter in the central aorta
can be helpful • Errors in zero level, balancing, calibration
Sources of Error • Tachycardia • Sudden changes in pressure •
Deterioration in frequency response • Catheter whip artifact •
End-pressure artifact • Catheter impact artifact • Systolic
pressure amplification in the periphery • Errors in zero level,
balancing, calibration Ø Zero level must be at mid chest level Ø
All manometers must be zeroed at same point Ø Zero reference point
must be changed if patient repositioned Ø Transducers should be
calibrated against standard mercury reference (rather than
electrical calibration signal) and linearity of response should be
verified using 25, 50, and 100 mm Hg
Intracardiac micromanometers (Catheter-tip pressure manometer)
• High fidelity transducer catheter with miniaturized transducer
placed at tip (Millar Instruments) • Improved frequency response
characteristics and reduced artifact • Measurement of myocardial
mechanics (dP/dt of LV)
Cardiac cycle Wiggers Diagram
Systolic ejection phase - QT interval on the ECG • LV systolic
pressure is measured at the peak pressure of the ejection
phase
Left ventricular end diastolic pressure • End Diastolic
pressure can be measured on the R wave of the ECG, which will
coincide just after the ‘a’ wave on the LV trace. This is called
the post ‘a’ wave measurement of EDP • To be measured at end
expiration
Aortic Pressure
Anachrotic Notch • During the first phase of ventricular
systole (isovolumetric contraction), a presystolic rise may be seen
• Occurs before the opening of the aortic valve
Dichrotic notch • Blood flow attempts to equalize by flowing
backwards - results in closure of the aortic valve • This event
marks the end of systole and the start of diastole
Pulse Pressure • The difference between the systolic and
diastolic pressure • Factors Factors that affect pulse pressure
pressure – changes in stroke volume – aortic regurgitation –
changes in vascular compliance
Common cardiological conditions Needs invasive monitoring
Aortic Stenosis(severity) • Discrepancy between the physical
examination and the elements of the Doppler echocardiogram •
Optimal technique: record simultaneously obtained left ventricular
and ascending aortic pressures • Mean gradient differences not the
peak to peak gradient (peak left ventricular pressure does not
occur simultaneously with the peak aortic pressure)
36. • Pullback traces with a single catheter from the left
ventricle to the aorta can be helpful, but only if the patient is
in normal sinus rhythm with a regular rate • Carabello sign:
üCritical aortic stenosis üCatheter across the valve itself will
cause further obstruction to outflow üThis sign occurs in valve
areas 0.6 cm2 or less & when 7F or 8F catheters are used to
cross the valve
Carabello sign
Use side hole catheters. Aortic pressure damping can occure
with end hole catheters
Dont use femoral arterial pressure: 1. Peripheral amplification
of arterial wave-decrease the gradient falsely 2. PAD-increase
gradient falsely
Evaluation of low flow low gradient aortic
stenosis(LVEF<40%) • Gradient (<30 mm Hg) and a low output,
resulting in a small calculated valve area(<1cm2) • These
patients with low-flow/low-gradient AS (LF/LGAS) may truly have
severe AS with resultant myocardial failure (true AS) or may have
more moderate degrees of AS and unrelated myocardial dysfunction
(pseudo- AS)
True AS: increased flow across a fixed valve orifice results in
increased transvalvular flow velocity and gradients, without a
change in calculated valve area. • Pseudo-AS: augmented flow
results in only a mild increase in transvalvular gradient and an
increase in valve area by ≥0.2 cm2
Dynamic LVOT obstruction • Visual assessment: üAortic stenosis:
• Delay(tardus) and reduction (parvus) in the upstroke of the
central aortic pressure üDynamic LVOT obstruction: • Spike-and-dome
pattern with an initial rapid upstroke • Late peaking left
ventricular pressure
Braunwald- Brockenborough sign
Mitral Stenosis • Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography is
highly accurate • Noninvasive estimations are inconsistent &
pulmonary hypertension out of proportion to the apparent severity
of the mitral valve disease • Simultaneous pulmonary artery wedge
pressure and left ventricular pressure
Overestimates
Evaluation of valvular regurgitation • left ventriculography
and aortic angiography are the modalities most often used to assess
the severity of valve regurgitation • When there is a discrepency
between clinical assessment and dopplar echocardiographic
measurement • Sellar criteria used
Sellers criteria
Precautions • Large-bore catheters and a large amount of
contrast to completely opacify the cardiac chambers(small amount
underestimate) • Avoidance of ventricular ectopy and entrapment of
the mitral valve apparatus by the catheter • High right anterior
oblique views for left ventriculograms may be necessary to avoid
the retrograde contrast from being superimposed on the spine or
descending aorta
Evaluation of aortic regurgitation • Grade 1: a small amount of
contrast material enters the left ventricle in diastole; it is
essentially cleared with each beat and never fills the ventricular
chamber • Grade 2: More contrast material enters with each diastole
and faint opacification of the entire chamber occurs • Grade 3: the
LV chamber is well opacified and equal in density with the
ascending aorta • Grade 4: complete, dense opacification of the LV
chamber in one beat, and the left ventricle appears more densely
opacified than the ascending aorta
Part of the angiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation
involves assessment of (LAO view): 1. Aortic valve leaflets
(mobility, calcification, number of leaflets) 2. Ascending aorta
(extent and type of dilatation) 3. Possible associated
abnormalities (e.g., coronary lesions, sinus of Valsalva aneurysm,
dissecting aneurysm of the aorta, and ventricular septal
defect)
Constrictive Pericarditis Versus Restrictive Cardiomyopathy CCP
RCM 1. Ventricular interdependence Present Absent 2. Pulmonary
arterial systolic pressure> 55-60 mm hg No Yes 3. Equalisation
of Right & Left ventricular EDP Yes No 4. Dip and platue
pattern of left ventricular end diastolic pressure Yes No 5.
RVEDP/RVSP> 1/3 Yes No
David G Hurrell et al. Circulation 1996
Ventricular interdependence • Highly sensitive & specific •
Also seen in cardiac tamponade, acute right ventricular infarction,
subacute tricuspid regurgitation • Inspiratory decrease in
pulmonary venous and intrathoracic pressure is not transmitted into
the cardiac chambers Hatle et al. Circulation.1989;79:357-370.
Irina Kozarez et al. Grand Rounds Vol 11 pages 111–114
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy • There is frequently a dynamic
left ventricular outflow tract obstruction that is highly dependent
on loading conditions and the contractile state of the
ventricle
Indication for septal ablation • Suitable anatomy • Severe
symptoms unresponsive to medical management • Documented left
ventricular outflow gradient of 50 mm Hg either at rest or during
provocation 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment
of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary
If there is a gradient 50 mm Hg at rest, provocative maneuvers
such as the Valsalva maneuver or induction of a premature
ventricular contraction should be performed • However, if a
gradient is not provoked with these maneuvers, infusion of
isoproterenol is helpful because direct stimulation of the beta 1
and beta 2 receptors simulates exercise and may uncover a labile
outflow tract gradient
Hemodynamics
The left ventricular outflow tract gradient is dynamic and can
change significantly during a single diagnostic catheterization •
It is recommended that catheters such as a multipurpose or
Rodriquez catheter with side holes at the distal portion of the
catheter should be used to determine the exact location of
obstruction (pigtail with multiple side holes to be avoided &
single end hole catheters to be avoided) Nishimura et al.
Circulation 2012
Brockenbrough-Braunwald sign • The decrease in pulse pressure
after a premature ventricular contraction is due to reduced stroke
volume caused by increased dynamic obstruction
HCM: Typical midcavitary obstruction Fernando Pivatto et al.
Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2014
8. Indicate the hemodynamic effect of morbid obesity on pressure
measurements and determine at least three clinical symptoms that
are indicated as risks (complications) for obesity
Check that the measurements for the heart rate are coming from
a normal distribution by constructing a histogram.
Create indicator variables for female and good AQI. Fit the
regression model and discuss its goodness of fit. What portion of
variation in heart rate can this model explain?
Write the fitted model. What variables are significant
predictors of heart rate at the 5% level of significance?
Plot residuals against predicted values. Does it show any
pattern?
Compute the predicted heart rate...
Question3: Consider the following 14 independent measurements
from a normal distribution:
Independent measurements
20 18 11 20 16 14 15 15 14 13 11 18 20 9
1) What is the standard error of the sample mean?
0.9936
3.5826
0.9575
3.4303
2) Calculate a 99% confidence interval for the population
mean.
[5.8831,24.6883]
[12.9734,17.5980]
[12.4015,18.1700]
[12.7480,17.8234]
Diastolic blood pressure measurements on American men ages 18-44
years follow approximately a normal curve with μ = 81 mm Hg and σ
=11 mm Hg. The distribution for women ages 18-44 is also
approximately normal with the same SD but with a lower mean, μ =75
mm Hg. Suppose we are going to measure the diastolic blood pressure
of n randomly selected men and n randomly selected women in the age
group 18-44 years. Let E be the event...
Suppose that the pH measurements of the field from the question
above follow a normal distribution with mean 11 pH and standard
deviation 2 pH. What is the probability that the engineer obtains a
sample mean (with n = 5) greater than 11.8 pH? Assume each
measurement is independent of each other.
A sample of blood pressure measurements is taken from a data set
and those values (mm Hg) are listed below. The values are matched
so that subjects each have systolic and diastolic measurements.
Find the mean and median for each of the two samples and then
compare the two sets of results. Are the measures of center the
best statistics to use with these data? What else might be
better?
Systolic Diastolic
154 53
118 51
149 77
120 87...
A sample of blood pressure measurements is taken from a data set
and those values (mm Hg) are listed below. The values are matched
so that subjects each have systolic and diastolic measurements.
Find the mean and median for each of the two samples and then
compare the two sets of results. Are the measures of center the
best statistics to use with these data? What else might be
better? Systolic: 150 126 95 140 154 159 145 101 152...
Suppose you have selected a random sample of ?=13 measurements
from a normal distribution. Compare the standard normal z values
with the corresponding t values if you were forming the following
confidence intervals.
a) 80% confidence interval
?=
?=
(b) 90% confidence interval
?=
?=
(c) 99% confidence interval
?=
?=
hw 9 # 15
Listed below are systolic blood pressure measurements (mm Hg)
taken from the right and left arms of the same woman. Assume that
the paired sample data is a simple random sample and that the
differences have a distribution that is approximately normal. Use a
0.05 significance level to test for a difference between the
measurements from the two arms. What can be concluded?
Right arm
143
137
121
138
131
Left arm
171
174
191
149...
hw 9 # 15
Listed below are systolic blood pressure measurements (mm Hg)
taken from the right and left arms of the same woman. Assume that
the paired sample data is a simple random sample and that the
differences have a distribution that is approximately normal. Use a
0.05 significance level to test for a difference between the
measurements from the two arms. What can be concluded?
Right arm
143
137
121
138
131
Left arm
171
174
191
149...