In: Math
When one company (A) buys another company(B), some workers of company B are terminated. Terminated workers get severance pay. To be fair, company A fixes the severance payment to company B workers as equivalent to company A workers who were terminated in the last one year. A 36-year-old Mohammed, worked for company B for the last 10 years earning 32000 per year, was terminated with a severance pay of 5 weeks of salary. Bill smith complained that this is unfair that someone with the same credentials worked in company A received more. You are called in to settle the dispute. You are told that severance is determined by three factors; age, length of service with the company and the pay. You have randomly taken a sample of 40 employees of company A terminated last year. You recorded
Number of weeks of severance pay
Age of employee
Number of years with the company
Annual pay in 1000s
Weeks SP |
Age |
Years |
Pay |
Weeks SP |
Age |
Years |
Pay |
13 |
37 |
16 |
46 |
11 |
44 |
12 |
35 |
13 |
53 |
19 |
48 |
10 |
33 |
13 |
32 |
11 |
36 |
8 |
35 |
8 |
41 |
14 |
42 |
14 |
44 |
16 |
33 |
5 |
33 |
7 |
37 |
3 |
28 |
4 |
40 |
6 |
27 |
4 |
35 |
10 |
43 |
9 |
31 |
14 |
39 |
12 |
36 |
4 |
29 |
3 |
33 |
12 |
50 |
17 |
30 |
7 |
31 |
2 |
43 |
10 |
43 |
11 |
29 |
12 |
45 |
15 |
40 |
14 |
49 |
14 |
29 |
7 |
44 |
15 |
32 |
12 |
48 |
17 |
36 |
8 |
42 |
13 |
42 |
12 |
41 |
17 |
37 |
11 |
41 |
10 |
38 |
8 |
39 |
8 |
36 |
9 |
32 |
5 |
25 |
12 |
49 |
16 |
28 |
10 |
45 |
13 |
36 |
10 |
37 |
10 |
35 |
18 |
48 |
19 |
40 |
11 |
37 |
13 |
37 |
10 |
46 |
14 |
36 |
17 |
52 |
20 |
34 |
8 |
28 |
6 |
22 |
13 |
42 |
11 |
33 |
15 |
44 |
16 |
32 |
14 |
42 |
19 |
38 |
7 |
40 |
6 |
27 |
5 |
27 |
2 |
25 |
9 |
37 |
8 |
37 |
11 |
50 |
15 |
36 |
2. How much variance is not explained by the model? Test the validity of the models that X predict Y (provide hypotheses, decision, conclusion and conclusion in the business context)
SUMMARY OUTPUT | ||||||
Regression Statistics | ||||||
Multiple R | 0.815223777 | |||||
R Square | 0.664589806 | |||||
Adjusted R Square | 0.636638957 | |||||
Standard Error | 2.03641213 | |||||
Observations | 40 | |||||
ANOVA | ||||||
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||
Regression | 3 | 295.8089229 | 98.60297429 | 23.77708797 | 1.16489E-08 | |
Residual | 36 | 149.2910771 | 4.146974365 | |||
Total | 39 | 445.1 | ||||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
Intercept | 5.043869282 | 3.279448261 | 1.538023741 | 0.132786894 | -1.607160062 | 11.69489863 |
Age | 0.042709678 | 0.084498975 | 0.5054461 | 0.616326346 | -0.128662187 | 0.214081542 |
Years | 0.505635057 | 0.123366833 | 4.098630432 | 0.000225843 | 0.255435523 | 0.755834591 |
Pay | -0.067275395 | 0.062311694 | -1.079659227 | 0.28747453 | -0.193649368 | 0.059098577 |
2. How much variance is not explained by the model?
This is given by R-squared or coefficient of determination.
R Square | 0.664589806 |
So 66.45 % variation in y is explained by the model and 33.54% variation is not explained by this model.
Hypothesis:
H_0: The regression is not significant.
H_1: The regression is significant.
The significance level of F-statistic = 1.16489*10^{-8} << 0.05
This probability is low enough to reject the null hypothesis using the common significance level of 0.05.
So We reject the null hypothesis that the regression is not significant.
We conclude that the regression is significant.