In: Operations Management
According to this article answer the following questions
A former Amazon manager alleges that her supervisor made her scour the social media accounts of applicants to determine their race and gender, and then fired her when she complained. Lisa McCarrick filed a lawsuit against an Amazon unit on Monday in the Superior Court of California, Alameda County, claiming retaliation, wrongful termination, failure to prevent discrimination and violation of the state's labor code. The 38-year-old, who lives in Rocklin, about 20 miles northeast of Sacramento, is also suing for violation of the state's Equal Pay Act, alleging that she made significantly less than her male colleagues although they were doing similar work. McCarrick joined Amazon as a loss prevention manager in July 2018 and was promoted to a regional manager five months later, the suit says. After her promotion, her supervisor instructed McCarrick to go through the social media profiles of job candidates "for the purpose of ascertaining race/ethnicity and gender," according to the lawsuit. McCarrick knew that Amazon had been criticized in the past for a lack of diversity in the workplace and thought what she was being asked to do was unlawful, according to the lawsuit. In September, she submitted a written complaint raising her concerns about being told to scour applicants' social media accounts and also the pay disparity between herself and her male coworkers. Two months later, in November, she was called into a meeting with human resources and the director of loss prevention informing her that she was fired. "During the meeting in which she was informed of her termination, it was communicated to her that her direct supervisor had admitted to utilizing social media accounts for the purpose of ascertaining race and ethnicity," the suit states. "Plaintiff's protected complaints of race/ethnicity discrimination were substantial motivating reasons for the decision to terminate her employment." The loss prevention director also told McCarrick during the meeting that her male colleagues do make more than her but "that happens all the time at Amazon," according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that throughout McCarrick's employment with Amazon she always received positive performance evaluations but she was told that the reason for her termination was due to "not meeting expectations." McCarrick is seeking damages. An Amazon spokesperson said in a statement Thursday that McCarrick's claims are inaccurate. “At our core, we fundamentally believe that diversity, inclusion, equality, and equal pay for equal work are not just good for our teams and our business, it's just simply right," the statement read. "While we cannot comment on the specifics of this ongoing legal proceeding, Ms. McCarrick's allegations are just not accurate.”
1) Does this case bring about issues or Corporate Social Responsibility? How? Why?
answer-
Yes, This case of Amazon firing its loss prevention Manager brings legal as well as CSR issues because CSR is a model where Company does business not only considering the benefit of its shareholders but other stakeholders. In this case, The stakeholder is McCarrick and candidates who were screened based on their race and gender.
A company under CSR has social responsibility to treat its employees with respect and provide fair and euitable workplace. In thise case, McCarrick was wrongfully terminated as she just retaliate and try to stop Supervisor to done such illegal and discriminatory act. McCarrick was doing her job as loss prevention because if candiadates are not selected based on their race and gender then company will face legal suits which would be a loss to company.
As McCarrick being a stakeholder of the company, Its leader must also pay fair compensation which McCarrick claims that she is earning less than as compared to her male collegue on same position.So this way, CSR issues are present in this case.