Question

In: Finance

Annie lists Mike, her former supervisor at Startup Inc. as a reference in her application for...

Annie lists Mike, her former supervisor at Startup Inc. as a reference in her application for an open position at Tech Corp. When the Tech Corp. hiring manager calls Mike to ask about Annie, Mike falsely states that Annie was fired for leaking trade secrets. Mike actually knew that Annie quit because she was unhappy with how the business was being run, but was concerned her comments would get back to investors. Tech Corp. decides not to hire Annie based on Mike’s statement. Does Annie have a defamation claim?

Group of answer choices

A. Yes, because Mike knowingly provided a false statement that hurt Annie’s reputation by preventing her from being hired by Tech Corp.

B. Yes, but only if Mike made this false statement to everyone who called to ask about Annie’s work history.

C. No, because Mike has a qualified privilege.

D. No, since Annie could have chosen not to list Mike as a reference.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Let's first understand what is "Defamation Claim"

Defamation happens when someone makes an intentionally false statement about an individual which harms the person. It is a personal injury that causes financial loss or emotional stress.

In the given question Mike makes an intentionally false claim about Annie which hurts Annie's chances of getting a new job.

Option A. Correct, Mike falsified the information while giving reference to a prospective employer for Annie. This was intentional as he was well aware of the reasons why Annie left the job at her previous organization. So it makes a defamation claim because Mike's statement caused the personal injury to Annie in terms of losing a job opportunity.

Option B. Incorrect, giving false information even once which caused damage to Annie's reputation and loss of job opportunity is sufficient to make a defamation claim. Mike does not necessarily have to make a false claim to everyone to defame Annie.

Option C. Incorrect, First let's understand what is a qualified privilege. Qualified privilege is protection or immunity against any defamation that may arise out of acts which are done as part of one's legal or moral duty, and act is free of malice or intent to harm. As per the statement given in the question, Mike knew the actual reason why Annie left her previous organization, still, Mike gave the wrong statement which could be considered malice.

Option D. Incorrect, Because Annie gave Mike as reference does not give any right to Mike to defame her reputation by making a false claim. Mike could have refused to give reference instead of giving false information.


Related Solutions

According to this article answer the following questions A former Amazon manager alleges that her supervisor...
According to this article answer the following questions A former Amazon manager alleges that her supervisor made her scour the social media accounts of applicants to determine their race and gender, and then fired her when she complained. Lisa McCarrick filed a lawsuit against an Amazon unit on Monday in the Superior Court of California, Alameda County, claiming retaliation, wrongful termination, failure to prevent discrimination and violation of the state's labor code. The 38-year-old, who lives in Rocklin, about 20...
Hallmark Cards, Inc. v. Murley When a former Hallmark employee breaches a term in her severance...
Hallmark Cards, Inc. v. Murley When a former Hallmark employee breaches a term in her severance contract, how much can Hallmark recover as damages? iStockPhoto.com/RiverNorthPhotography BACKGROUND AND FACTS Janet Murley was the vice president of marketing at Hallmark Cards, Inc., until Hallmark eliminated her position as part of a corporate restructuring. As a vice president, Murley had access to Hallmark’s confidential information, including its business plans, market research, and financial statements. In 2002, Murley and the company entered into a...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT