Question

In: Statistics and Probability

6. A test is administered on two occasions to a reference group of participants and based...

6. A test is administered on two occasions to a reference group of participants and based upon the correlation across participants between the two occasions a determination is made about the test.

a. construct validity

b. test-retest reliabilty

c. criterion-referenced measurement

d. Spearman Brown prophecy formula

e. Cronbach alpha reliabilty formula

f. Criterion-related predictive validity

g. Criterion-related concurrent validity

h. inter-rater reliabilty

i. Content validity

j. Alternate or equilvalent forms of reliabilty

l. Cronbacj alpha validity coefficient

m. Kuder-Richardson reliabilty formula

7. A test is administered one time to a reference group and each item is scored on a Likert type scale. Based upon how each item contributes to the total score a determination is made.

a. construct validity

b. test-retest reliabilty

c. criterion-referenced measurement

d. Spearman Brown prophecy formula

e. Cronbach alpha reliabilty formula

f. Criterion-related predictive validity

g. Criterion-related concurrent validity

h. inter-rater reliabilty

i. Content validity

j. Alternate or equilvalent forms of reliabilty

l. Cronbacj alpha validity coefficient

m. Kuder-Richardson reliabilty formula

8. A test is administered to a reference group. After a year or more has passed observations are made concerning the job/school success of the group. A correlation is computed to make a determination.

a. construct validity

b. test-retest reliabilty

c. criterion-referenced measurement

d. Spearman Brown prophecy formula

e. Cronbach alpha reliabilty formula

f. Criterion-related predictive validity

g. Criterion-related concurrent validity

h. inter-rater reliabilty

i. Content validity

j. Alternate or equilvalent forms of reliabilty

l. Cronbacj alpha validity coefficient

m. Kuder-Richardson reliabilty formula

9. A new test was developed taking care to ensure analytically that the items on the test represented the curriculum to be taught and learned. A determination was made.

a. construct validity

b. test-retest reliabilty

c. criterion-referenced measurement

d. Spearman Brown prophecy formula

e. Cronbach alpha reliabilty formula

f. Criterion-related predictive validity

g. Criterion-related concurrent validity

h. inter-rater reliabilty

i. Content validity

j. Alternate or equilvalent forms of reliabilty

l. Cronbacj alpha validity coefficient

m. Kuder-Richardson reliabilty formula

Solutions

Expert Solution

1. Appropriate test based on correlation when two version of test administered to reference group:

INTER RATER RELIABILITY is the best test used in this condition since it is used to observe the same behaviour independently between two groups and compare the results

EXAMPLE: Job performance assessment by office managers. Suppose if an employee receives a score of 9 from one group of managers and a score of 2 from other group of managers. Then inter rater reliability is used to determine that something is wrong with method of scoring and thus exposes the issue so that it can be corrected.

3. Appropriate test based on correlation when two tests are administered to a reference group. One is a new intelligence test and the second is the Stanford-Binet intelligence test.

Alternate and equivalent forms of reliability is used where two tests are given to same sample of reference group and estimate of reliability is calculated from two groups. On a simple note you are trying to find out that test 1 is measures the same thing as test 2.

In other words you want to know if two test scores stay the same.

4. Special estimation technique used when test is administered in onee time to a reference group and the test is divided into two parts.

Spearman brown prophecy formula is used in evaluating test reliability.

It takes split half correlation as input which only estimates reliability of half length test and implements correction to find true estimate of full length test.

rho*= n*rho / [1+(n-1)*rho]

Here formula takes split half reliability (rho) and number of tests (n) as input and produces full length equivalent (rho*)


Related Solutions

1. Two versions of a test are administered to a reference group of participants and based...
1. Two versions of a test are administered to a reference group of participants and based upon the correlation acrosss participants between the two occasions a determination is made about the test. a. construct validity b. test-retest reliabilty c. criterion-referenced measurement d. Spearman Brown prophecy formula e. Cronbach alpha reliabilty formula f. Criterion-related predictive validity g. Criterion-related concurrent validity h. inter-rater reliabilty i. Content validity j. Alternate or equilvalent forms of reliabilty l. Cronbacj alpha validity coefficient m. Kuder-Richardson reliabilty...
10 research participants were administered an anxiety test under both noisy and quiet conditions. The data...
10 research participants were administered an anxiety test under both noisy and quiet conditions. The data are as follows: Using SPSS Participant Noisy Quiet 1 16 10 2 5 3 3 12 10 4 9 5 5 23 15 6 7 8 7 13 12 8 21 17 9 10 15 10 5 25 What is the mean and standard deviation for anxiety in the quiet condition? What is the mean and standard deviation for anxiety in the noisy condition?...
The following data contains the data for a group of participants that took a timed test....
The following data contains the data for a group of participants that took a timed test. The data are the average amount of time the participants took on each item (response time) and the number of guesses it took to get each item correct (number correct). Do this using SPSS; make sure you show your output data as well as your responses to the following questions. A. What is the regression equation for predicting response time from number correct? B....
A group of volunteers are randomly divided into two groups. One group of participants takes a...
A group of volunteers are randomly divided into two groups. One group of participants takes a pill each morning for a year which contains antioxidants (Vitamins A, C, E, etc), while the other group takes a placebo pill for the same time period. Following this they are measured on a problem solving task given under stressful conditions. The number of errors is counted during solution. Results were: GROUP 1         GROUP 2 ANTIOXIDANTS PLACEBO (CONTROL) N = 14    ...
A pool of participants was randomly divided into FIVE treatment groups. The groups were administered daily...
A pool of participants was randomly divided into FIVE treatment groups. The groups were administered daily doses of vitamin C over a 12-month period. The data in the table represents the number of cold and flu viruses reported by the participant as a function of their vitamin C dosage. Using α = .05, analyze the data using the correct statistical procedure. 0mg 250mg 500mg 1000mg 2000mg 6 3 3 4 1 5 4 3 1 0 3 4 5 2...
A pool of participants was randomly divided into FIVE treatment groups. The groups were administered daily...
A pool of participants was randomly divided into FIVE treatment groups. The groups were administered daily doses of vitamin C over a 12-month period. The data in the table represents the number of cold and flu viruses reported by the participant as a function of their vitamin C dosage. Using a=.05, analyze the data using the correct statistical procedure. 0mg 250mg 500mg 1000mg 2000mg 6 5 3 4 3 2 3 5 3 3 3 4 4 5 4 3...
An independent sample experiment uses 25 participants in one group and 30 participants in the second...
An independent sample experiment uses 25 participants in one group and 30 participants in the second group to compare the  two population means. What is the degrees of freedom used in this test ?   a. 25 b. 24 c. 30 d. 29
Define Reference group and discuss how reference group influence our attitudes, opinions  and behavior. i need detailed...
Define Reference group and discuss how reference group influence our attitudes, opinions  and behavior. i need detailed answer please
Below are 5 participants’ ratings of how likable two comedians were. Based on these data, conduct...
Below are 5 participants’ ratings of how likable two comedians were. Based on these data, conduct a related-samples t test to analyze whether likable ratings differ between groups. Participants Ratings for humorous comedian Ratings for non-humorous comedian 1 8 2 2 6 3 3 7 4 4 4 5 5 5 1 =6 =3 A. Write down the null and alternative hypotheses using proper notation B. Calculate , given estimated standard error = 1.14 (You will earn maximally 3 bonus...
A corporate trainer administered a test to eight employees prior to their participation in a training...
A corporate trainer administered a test to eight employees prior to their participation in a training program. The trainer administered the test again after participation. Raw test scores from each administration are as follows: Test-Taker First Administration Second Administration John 6 6 Doug 5 4 Christina 8 7 Sammy 4 2 Todd 4 8 Terri 2 1 Abel 6 7 Theresa 3 3 Answer the following questions 1. What is the test-retest reliability coefficient for the test? 2. What is...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT