In: Psychology
Slaughterhouse-Five Analysis
Why end with the novel with "Poo-tee-weet?"
The birds in Slaughterhouse-Five make the sound "Poo-tee-weet”.
It is something that is often heard after a massacre. The sound
"Poo-tee-weet" is a substitute, an outlandish clamor made by birds
that speaks to the way that there is nothing coherent that can be
said about war or massacres. The demise and misfortune from war
isn't something that can be dissected or successfully praised; the
main thing we can say is completely unimportant even with the
devastation.
The book centers around the fire-besieging of Dresden, a genuine
occasion that Vonnegut survived as a POW—simply like Billy Pilgrim.
Vonnegut has Pilgrim experience a similar encounter with the goal
that he can offer the expression that the misfortune and harm of
war are inexpressible—no words can enough portray it, and there is
nothing we can say to catch the extension or profundity of the
misfortune. Vonnegut, in "Dresden Revisited," ventures to such an
extreme as to state,
The Dresden barbarity, hugely costly and carefully arranged, was so
futile, at long last, that just a single individual on the whole
planet got any profit by it. I am that individual. I composed this
book, which earned a great deal of money for me and made my
notoriety, with the way things are. Somehow, I got a few dollars
for each individual murdered. Some business I'm in.
The pointlessness of the monstrous loss of human life is
exemplified in the expression "poo-tee-weet"— and the superfluous
idea of war, when all is said in done, is the thing that Vonnegut
catches by shutting his novel by the words. At last he leaves the
peruser with that question—"Poo-tee-weet?" Nothing anybody can say
will ever truly mean anything else than the sound of a flying
creature chirping in the quietness of such a significant number of
dead.
Thanks:)..