Question

MAN4402

Discussion Question

1.) More and more these days, companies are requiring new hires to be nicotine free. This is due to several factors, including a healthier workforce and cost savings just to name a couple. What are your thoughts about this practice? Would you work for a company that wanted to control its employees' activities to the extent that it prohibits them from smoking? After all, what else could they try to prohibit? What are your thoughts?

Answer 1

ANSWER:

Indeed, the facts demonstrate that these days an ever increasing number of organizations are progressively worried about the workforce which is progressively solid and progressively economical as a result of the decline in the work turnover proportion.

• Certainly working for such organization is special as the organization hopes to advance security in wellbeing and better defend against interminable ailments like Asthma and Pneumonia and lung camcer and furthermore make sound work environment model.
• Compnay here attempts to restrict risky propensities and culture of smoking which lessens profitability at work environments and causes wellbeing perils to others too.
• An ever increasing number of nowadays organizations are requiring recently recruited employees to be sans nicotine.
• This is because of a few components including a solid workforce and cost-sparing only two significant elements.
• It is where the proficiency and adequacy of the workforce are critical to think about the profitability of the organization.
• In the event that the workforce is solid, at that point there is a superior opportunity to build the profitability in the association and the maintainability and the dependability of the workforce in contrast with the other association is acceptable.

THINGS THEY TRY TO PROHIBIT:

• The preclusion of smoking is consistently unrealistic however yes you can control the regular event of this habit.The disallowance of smoking can likewise relate it with the advancement of the general public

CONCLUSION:

It is likewise identified with the association's corporate social obligation. As I would like to think, this is the best approach to oversee society and to keep up the parity in the earth and in the association.

Note: if you like my work please give an upvote.