In: Operations Management
Managing the Productivity of Human capital under various Leadership approaches
Various leadership approaches -
1.Autocratic Leadership style:
The current generation of employees is resistant to autocratic leadership and hence received lot of criticism from academicians. This type of leadership style is applicable in certain situations where the staff is not well trained. In some cases where staff does not respond to other forms of leadership can be dealt with autocratic leadership. The autocratic leadership should not be used in where are staff would like to contribute with their inputs and knowledge based projects.
The approach of autocratic leadership style concerned with the decision making power. This leadership style doesn’t obtain contribution of their followers and they always fix that the staff accept their decisions. These leaders suggest only structured and inflexible rewards but they wouldn’t support performance related compensation. These leaders must not concern of follower’s justifications even if they took wrong decisions. They often punish their sub-ordinates and they have fixed behavior. Therefore the staff cannot feel they are the part of the organization and there will not be any correlation. So the employee cannot contribute his maximum effort.
The recent generation avoids this kind of leadership style. But this leadership style work out in some critical situations when the employees are not trained well and when the subordinates are not responding to other leadership styles. However this leadership style must not use where the employees are contribute with their skills, knowledge and willingness to work.
2.Bureaucratic Leadership Style -
This leadership style strictly follows the policies, rules, procedures and regulations blindly. This leadership style success where the repetitive work will be done frequently. In this style if the decision making is not according to the policies and procedure then they will go for another level of decision making.
This kind of leadership well exist where dealing with accounting and cash in each section. But the staff may disinterest towards their work. This is well applicable to those who have minimum skills and the performance is not up to the mark.
Benefits: Here every problem contains solution instantly without any practice.
3.Charismatic Leadership style -
In this leadership style, the leader concentrates on himself and try to be a charismatic. The subordinates transformed to champions of the cause
Benefits: This kind of leadership needs many followers to support the leader’s views, look after his origin.
4.Laissez Faire Leadership style -
This kind of leadership style doesn’t influence the subordinate
by guiding and directing. These leaders make their sub ordinate to
make decisions without restrictions and the followers or
subordinates make their decisions. This is the current leadership
style where the organizations are following.
In this style the leader must aware of the knowledge of their
subordinates. Here the leader assumes, the staff is trained enough,
intelligent and qualified. In the organization where knowledge
based for e.g. software companies employees are enjoy working their
own and solving problems.
5.Democratic Leadership styles -
This kind of leadership style is a contribution leadership. Here the leaders consider their subordinates efforts while decision making. The leader educates their group regarding the activities in which they are involving. Though the team participate form the beginning to execute it. It supports the group members in any situation. This democratic leadership performs as a coaching and motivating their group members in all areas. Although the staff contribution as a role. Therefore the employee compensation and reward will be based on his performance.
The democratic style of leadership is mostuseful if the sub-ordinates are active and active participates in making decisions. However the multi type projects need contribution from other divisions and other employees. The technology based projects require the huge support form other divisions and also they are up to date. But the problems are not appropriate for these leaders. This kind of leadership strategies are obtained from collection of group employees.