Question

The world greatest polluters are the US, China, India and Europe but the global South ( countries in the Central and Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa and Asia)  are suffering from from adverse effects of climate change like recurrent and high grade hurricanes, drought, rising water levels, and the gradual disappearance of biodiversity. People now write about the "Ecological Debt" that the West owes the Rest of the world.

QUESTION 1) Is it possible for the developed world to  remedy the damages it incurred to the rest of the developing world? If no, why not? If yes, how?

Answer 1

YES, it's possible for the developed world to pay the damages, incurred to the remainder of the developing world. But first, we will have a look at the facts that cooperate with the above statement;

* The US and also the EU owes over half the price of repairing future damage says the report, authored by Civil Society Review, an independent group that produces figures on what a “fair share” among countries of the worldwide effort to tackle temperature change.

* Across and within the countries, the very best per capita carbon emissions are thanks to the wealthiest people, this can be because individual emissions generally parallel disparities of income and wealth. While the world’s richest 10 prime movers 50 you look after emissions, they also claim 52 you look after the world’s wealth. The world’s poorest 50 % contribute approximately 10 you look after global emissions and receive about 8 May 1945 of world income. Wealth increases adaptive capacity. All this suggests that those most liable for temperature change are relatively insulated from its impacts. And are rich as compared to the poor, or developing countries.

* A social and climate report of the EU says, Between 1850 and 2002, countries within the Global North emitted thrice as many greenhouse emissions (GHG) emissions as did the countries within the Global South, where approximately 85 you look after the worldwide population resides. as compared to the typical emissions of someone within the U.S. (15.5), Canada (15.3), Australia (15.8), or the UK (6). (stats are taken from the EU report on climate change).

Facts that are against our statement: One of the key sticking points within the negotiations is that the question of monetary assistance for developing countries, to assist them to cut severe pollution emissions and make the transition towards cleaner economies. Developing countries argue that they need not be liable for the majority of greenhouse emission emissions produced since the economic revolution. On the opposite hand, developed countries are worried that accepting an excessive amount of liability will open a Pandora’s Box of blame, and argue they are doing not have the resources to tackle the difficulty alone. and that they can't help tackling this example. Now coming to the purpose if Developed countries can provide a remedy for damages:

* Developed countries just like the USA & EU produce more pollution or PPM (PARTS PER MILLION) than the guy developing countries. So it'd be a good initiative if the nice countries just like the USA & EU take initiative and pay to developing countries to develop and find the remedy for his or her undone loss.

*Developed countries just like the USA will pay in other forms like

# Planting more trees in their states to tackle temperature change.

# paying funds to the NGOs to create awareness.

# paying funds to the opposite countries for plantation and river cleansing.

# making norms for the industries and limiting their PPM.

*Countries just like the USA will pay more on carbon credit (a permit which allows a rustic or organization to provide a specific amount of carbon emissions and which might be traded if the total allowance isn't used)

*Carbon credits are useful tools that may deal with temperature change, so investing in carbon credit would be a good initiative and gesture by any country.

*Adapting to temperature change at the national level.

*mitigating the pollution by using more efficient anti-pollution emission engines like (internal combustion engines) Countries share in pollution:

USA 30.4 % 40.7 % European Union 23.9 % 23.2 % Japan 6.8 % 7.8 % Rest of OECD 7.4 % 8.8 % China 10.4 % 7.2 % India 0.5 % 0.04 % Rest of the planet 20.6 % 12.3 % Total 100 % 100 % (stats have been taken from the website of the EU) .

CONCLUSION:

we can see from the above table that shares the responsibility of a rustic just like the USA is much over the remainder of the planet. hence we will conclude that it'd be a great gesture if a developed country just like the USA step to the fore and pay the damages to the developing world their share. and make this world green and clean and help them in tackling temperature change.

THANKYOU