In: Math
It is generally accepted that patients grow anxious when a person
with a white coat and stethoscope walks into an examining room;
i.e., patients have white coat hypertension. A family practitioner
hypothesizes the opposite effect. To test this, the practitioner
has colleagues from the practice randomly visit patients in a white
coat or non-white sport coat, and measure their blood pressure.
What can the practitioner conclude with an α of 0.05?
Below are the systolic blood pressures of the patients.
white | non-white |
---|---|
117 116 111 125 119 121 113 118 98 |
103 98 118 117 116 103 113 112 105 |
a) What is the appropriate test statistic?
---Select--- na z-test One-Sample t-test Independent-Samples t-test
Related-Samples t-test
b)
Condition 1:
---Select--- examining room white coat hypertension non-white coat
white coat blood pressure
Condition 2:
---Select--- examining room white coat hypertension non-white coat
white coat blood pressure
c) Compute the appropriate test statistic(s) to
make a decision about H0.
(Hint: Make sure to write down the null and alternative hypotheses
to help solve the problem.)
p-value = ; Decision: ---Select---
Reject H0 Fail to reject H0
d) compute the corresponding effect size(s) and
indicate magnitude(s).
If not appropriate, input and/or select "na" below.
d = ; ---Select--- na trivial
effect small effect medium effect large effect
r2 = ; ---Select--- na
trivial effect small effect medium effect large effect
e) Make an interpretation based on the
results.
The systolic blood pressure for patients that where visited by a practitioner with a white coat was significantly higher from patients that were visited by a practitioner in a non-white sport coat.
The systolic blood pressure for patients that where visited by a practitioner with a white coat was significantly lower from patients that were visited by a practitioner in a non-white sport coat.
The systolic blood pressure for patients that where visited by a practitioner with a white coat did not significantly differ from patients that were visited by a practitioner in a non-white sport coat.
To test the null hypothesis H0: There is no difference between the systolic blood pressure of patients visited by a practitioner with a white coat with that of those visited by a practitioner in a non-white sport coat. ie. µd=0
H1:not H0
with level of significance α = 0.05. Since the measurements of blood pressure are taken on the same person under two different conditions we use the paired t-test.
Working:
White(X) | Non White(Y) | X-Y | (X-Y)^2 | |
1 | 117 | 103 | 14 | 196 |
2 | 116 | 98 | 18 | 324 |
3 | 111 | 118 | -7 | 49 |
4 | 125 | 117 | 8 | 64 |
5 | 119 | 116 | 3 | 9 |
6 | 121 | 103 | 18 | 324 |
7 | 113 | 113 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 118 | 112 | 6 | 36 |
9 | 98 | 105 | -7 | 49 |
SUM(X-Y)= | 53 | 1051 |
We use the following formula to calculate the t - score
Conclusion: At 5% level of significance we conclude that the systolic blood pressure of patients that were visited by a practitioner with a white coat did not significantly differ from patients that were visited by a practitioner in a non white sport coat.