In: Economics
what are some of the effects of status on the conduct of bargaining? what are some of the disadvantages to paying attention to secondary status characteristics in negotiation
Distributive bargaining is sometimes called position negotiation
or strong agreement and attempts to allocate a fixed share of
benefits. Distributive negotiation operates on a zero-sum condition
and implies that any profits one party earns are spent on the other
and vice versa. For this reason, distribution negotiations are
sometimes referred to as loss of profits due to the assumption that
one person's gain is the loss of another. Examples of distributor
bargains include buying prices on the open market, including car or
home price negotiations.
During negotiations, the dealers often take a final or fixed
stance, knowing it will not be accepted, and then trying to get
back down as far as possible before reaching an agreement.
Distributor negotiators view negotiations as a fixed-price
allocation process. Distributed distribution negotiations often
involve people who have never had an interaction before, and they
will not repeat them in the future, though all negotiations usually
have a distribution element.
In the distribution method, each negotiator fights the largest
piece, so the parties tend to think of themselves as more rivals
than partners and grab a faster line. Given that perspective theory
shows that people value losses more than profits and are more
susceptible to losses, negotiation of concessions is likely to be
brighter and less productive.