In: Accounting
Consider the following cash flows of two mutually exclusive
projects for Spartan Rubber Company. Assume the discount rate for
both projects is 8 percent.
Year | Dry Prepreg | Solvent Prepreg | ||||
0 | –$ | 1,810,000 | –$ | 805,000 | ||
1 | 1,111,000 | 430,000 | ||||
2 | 922,000 | 710,000 | ||||
3 | 761,000 | 412,000 | ||||
a. What is the payback period for each project?
(Do not round intermediate calculations and round your
answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)
Payback period | ||
Dry Prepreg | 1.92 1.92 Incorrect years | |
Solvent Prepreg | 2.20 2.20 Incorrect years | |
b. What is the NPV for each project? (Do
not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2
decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)
NPV | ||
Dry Prepreg | $ 94643.09 94643.09 Incorrect | |
Solvent Prepreg | $ 89318.70 89318.70 Incorrect | |
c. What is the IRR for each project? (Do
not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answers as a
percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g.,
32.16.)
IRR | ||
Dry Prepreg | 19.08 19.08 Incorrect % | |
Solvent Prepreg | 13.69 13.69 Incorrect % | |
d. Calculate the incremental IRR for the cash
flows. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your
answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g.,
32.16.)
Incremental IRR
Not attempted%
a. The Pay-back Period of the projects are as follows:
Computations:
Cumulative Cash flows:
Dry Prepreg | Solvent Prepreg | |||
Year | Cash flows | Cumulative Cash flows | Cash flows | Cumulative Cash flows |
1 | $ 1,111,000 | $ 1,111,000 | $ 430,000 | $ 430,000 |
2 | $ 922,000 | $ 2,033,000 | $ 710,000 | $1,140,000 |
3 | $ 761,000 | $ 2,794,000 | $ 412,000 | $1,552,000 |
From the above table, it can be observed that the cash flows exceeds the initial investment in year 2 in both the projects.
The incremental cash flows required to recover the initial investment and proportionate time taken to recover them are as follows:
Dry Prepreg | Solvent Prepreg | |
Initial Investment | $ 1,810,000 | $ 805,000 |
Less: Cash flows in year 1 | $ (1,111,000) | $ (430,000) |
Incremental Cash flows required in year 2 | $ 699,000 | $ 375,000 |
Total Cash flows during the year 2 | $ 922,000 | $ 710,000 |
Time taken to recover the incremental cash flows | 0.76 | 0.53 |
Time taken in months | 9.10 | 6.34 |
Total Pay-back period | 1.76 | 1.53 |
b. The NPV of the projects are as follows:
Computation:
Dry Prepreg | |||
Year | Cash flows | PV factor @ 8% | PV of cash flows |
1 | $ 1,111,000 | 0.93 | $ 1,028,703.70 |
2 | $ 922,000 | 0.86 | $ 790,466.39 |
3 | $ 761,000 | 0.79 | $ 604,106.34 |
Total PV of cash flows | $ 2,423,276.43 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | $ (1,810,000) | ||
NPV of the Project | $ 613,276.43 |
Solvent Prepreg | |||
Year | Cash flows | PV factor @ 8% | PV of cash flows |
1 | $ 430,000 | 0.93 | $ 398,148.15 |
2 | $ 710,000 | 0.86 | $ 608,710.56 |
3 | $ 412,000 | 0.79 | $ 327,058.88 |
Total PV of cash flows | $ 1,333,917.59 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | $ (805,000) | ||
NPV of the Project | $ 528,917.59 |
c. Internal Rate of Return of the projects:
Computation
Internal Rate of return is that level of discount rate at which the NPV of the project will be 0. It should be calculated using the trial and error method.
IRR of project Dry prepreg:
Let the discount rate be 27%. The NPV of the project will be:
Dry Prepreg | |||
Year | Cash flows | PV factor @ 27% | PV of cash flows |
1 | $ 1,111,000 | 0.79 | $ 874,803.15 |
2 | $ 922,000 | 0.62 | $ 571,641.14 |
3 | $ 761,000 | 0.49 | $ 371,512.55 |
Total PV of cash flows | $ 1,817,956.85 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | $ (1,810,000) | ||
NPV of the Project | $ 7,956.85 |
If the discount rate is 28%, the resulting NPV would be:
Dry Prepreg | |||
Year | Cash flows | PV factor @ 28% | PV of cash flows |
1 | $ 1,111,000 | 0.78 | $ 867,968.75 |
2 | $ 922,000 | 0.61 | $ 562,744.14 |
3 | $ 761,000 | 0.48 | $ 362,873.08 |
Total PV of cash flows | $ 1,793,585.97 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | $ (1,810,000) | ||
NPV of the Project | $ (16,414.03) |
From the above 2 tables, it can be observed that the IRR lies somewhere in between 27% and 28%
To find out IRR, we should follow interpolation technique.
Incremental NPV at 27% (a) | $ 7,956.85 |
NPV lost when discount rate changed from 27% to 28% (b) | $ 24,370.88 |
Incremental IRR to recover the incremental NPV = (a) / (b) | 0.33 |
Total IRR = 27% + 0.33% = 27.33% (approx)
IRR of project Solvent prepreg:
Let discount rate of the project be 41%, then NPV is:
Solvent Prepreg | |||
Year | Cash flows | PV factor @ 41% | PV of cash flows |
1 | $ 430,000 | 0.71 | $ 304,964.54 |
2 | $ 710,000 | 0.50 | $ 357,124.89 |
3 | $ 412,000 | 0.36 | $ 146,973.78 |
Total PV of cash flows | $ 809,063.22 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | $ (805,000) | ||
NPV of the Project | $ 4,063.22 |
Let us assume the discount rate to be 42%, the resulting NPV is:
Solvent Prepreg | |||
Year | Cash flows | PV factor @ 42% | PV of cash flows |
1 | $ 430,000 | 0.70 | $ 302,816.90 |
2 | $ 710,000 | 0.50 | $ 352,112.68 |
3 | $ 412,000 | 0.35 | $ 143,890.52 |
Total PV of cash flows | $ 798,820.10 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | $ (805,000) | ||
NPV of the Project | $ (6,179.90) |
From the above 2 tables, it can be observed that the IRR lies somewhere in between 41% and 42%
To find out IRR, we should follow interpolation technique.
Incremental NPV at 41% (a) | $ 4,063.22 |
NPV lost when discount rate changed from 41% to 42% (b) | $ 10,242.128 |
Incremental IRR to recover the incremental NPV = (a) / (b) | 0.40 |
Total IRR = 41% + 0.40% = 41.40% (approx)
d. Incremental IRR of the projects is 13.38%
Incremental cash flows:
Year | Dry Prepreg | Solvent Prepreg | Incremental Cash flows |
1 | $ 1,111,000 | $ 430,000 | $ 681,000 |
2 | $ 922,000 | $ 710,000 | $ 212,000 |
3 | $ 761,000 | $ 412,000 | $ 349,000 |
Incremental Initial Investment | $ (1,810,000) | $(805,000) | $ (1,005,000) |
Incremental IRR using trial and error method:
Let the discount rate be 13%. The resulting NPV is:
Year | Cash flows | PV factor @ 13% | PV of cash flows |
1 | $ 681,000 | 0.88 | $ 602,654.87 |
2 | $ 212,000 | 0.78 | $ 166,027.10 |
3 | $ 349,000 | 0.69 | $ 241,874.51 |
Total PV of cash flows | $ 1,010,556.47 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | $ (1,005,000) | ||
NPV of the Project | $ 5,556.47 |
Let the discount rate be 14%. The resulting NPV is:
Year | Cash flows | PV factor @ 14% | PV of cash flows |
1 | $ 681,000 | 0.88 | $ 597,368.42 |
2 | $ 212,000 | 0.77 | $ 163,127.12 |
3 | $ 349,000 | 0.67 | $ 235,565.06 |
Total PV of cash flows | $ 996,060.60 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | $ (1,005,000) | ||
NPV of the Project | $ (8,939.40) |
From the above 2 tables, it can be observed that the IRR lies somewhere in between 13% and 14%
To find out IRR, we should follow interpolation technique.
Incremental NPV at 13% (a) | $ 5,556.47 |
NPV lost when discount rate changed from 13% to 14% (b) | $ 14,495.87 |
Incremental IRR to recover the incremental NPV = (a) / (b) | 0.38 |
Total IRR = 13% + 0.38% = 13.38% (approx)