Question

Explain the differences between Daoism and Zoroastrianism. What misconceptions do people have about these two religions

Answer 1

Answer:

Zoroastrianism is pro-active within the sense that philosophical theory isn't. And Mazdaism isn't against any drives and wishes apart from it advocate the long-run drives and wishes once these impinge on short impulses.

Therefore Zarathushtra's target thinking BEFORE speaking BEFORE acting.

Another distinction between Mazdaism and philosophical theory is that in philosophical theory individuals wish to become immortal and live forever. There have been many meditation practices and chemical experiments that were dedicated to this ideal. As an example, there's one Daoism faculty that will have its followers produce associate "astral fetus" inside their physical bodies so as to survive one's physical death.

Daoism doesn't have the NEGATIVITY towards drives and wishes that's thus common in Buddhist philosophy. However, neither will philosophical theory harbor the construct of PRODUCTIVITY of drives and wishes inherent to Mazdaism. thus whereas philosophical theory fosters associate angle of management and reconciliation, inside Zarathushtra's philosophy the act of reconciliation isn't directed AGAINST DRIVE or need however rather Zarathushtra discusses the opposites of long-run drives and wishes as SUPERIOR to short drives and wishes. However in Zarathushtra's world drives and wishes area unit smart and productive in themselves. No surprise Zarathushtra was critical to the cultures of monks, nuns, and hermits common to CULTURES OF RESTRAINT. Zarathushtra was opposed t restraint, however, he was all for CLEVERNESS. I think this can be what Dino is at too once he points out the tiny however still an existent distinction between Mazdaism and philosophical theory, it’s probably nearest relative in philosophy, and additionally a dominant influence on Zen, rather like Mazdaism.