Question

In: Physics

So I know the basic gist is that fusion power's main issue is sustaining the fusion....

So I know the basic gist is that fusion power's main issue is sustaining the fusion. I also know that there are two methods. The Torus method and the laser method. The torus magnetically contains plasma and heats it with radiation and accelerates the plasma around to make strong enough collisions that protons fuse. The laser method uses 192 lasers and focuses it on tiny frozen hydrogen pellets and aims to initiate fusion each time pellets are dropped.

The though struck me when we could sorta combine the two designs together. The torus doesn't have to worry about making fusion happen at a specific location but it has issues in that the plasma is unevenly heated and leaks. On the other hand, the laser design is extremely complicated in the level of precision needed and would have to repeat this for every pellet. This lead me to think to make something precise and contained at the same time.

I see that particle colliders are able to direct two beams of protons and have them collide at a specific spot with a very precise energy. Couldn't we tune the energy of the two beams of protons to the energy required for them to fuse? We have the ability to smash them into bits, surely we have the ability to have them fuse. (I'm thinking about the type of collider that circles two beams in opposite directions)

It would be at much lower energies than normal colliders and would be very precise and it would be possible to fuse at a specific location that has greater leeway because for protons that missed collision, they'd just circle around again! Thus protons would efficiently be used and very little would be wasted. There wouldn't be problems of plasma leakage because we are focusing them in a thin tight beam.

It seems that this idea has girth, or I feel this way at least, can someone back me up by offering some calculations on how to calculate the efficiency? How would I go about calculating the two circling beams of protons and at what specific velocity would be needed? etc.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A subtle problem you seem to overlook is that the proton-proton cross section is very small, about 0.07 barns (a barn is 10?28 square meters) at the LHC energies and not dramatically different at your lower "fusion energies". It means that at the LHC, much like at your dream machine, most of the protons simply don't hit their partners. It is not really possible to focus the proton beams arbitrarily accurately, for various reasons (the uncertainty principle is the truly unavoidable effect: you either localize the beams in the transverse direction, into a "thin pipe", or you specify that the velocity in this transverse direction is zero which is needed if you want to preserve the location "in the thin pipe" in the future, but you can't do both at the same moment). If it were possible, the LHC would be among the first ones that would use the method, to increase the luminosity.

So if you accelerate two beams of protons against each other, an overwhelming majority of them will simply continue in their original motion. (The protons in the LHC have to orbit for half an hour or so


Related Solutions

define and describe the main, basic issue of mind-body problem
define and describe the main, basic issue of mind-body problem
So if I have KNO3 and I mix it with water, is the solution basic or...
So if I have KNO3 and I mix it with water, is the solution basic or acidic? How do I know? I'm very confused in how to know if acids or bases are made when mixing something with water.. Also, is ClO- a weak acid or a base when mixed with water? and how?
okay so i am working on a physic review quetion that i seem not to know...
okay so i am working on a physic review quetion that i seem not to know where to start.. It states as follow A magnetic field of .250T points straight up in a lab, a circular coil of wire with 10 turns, a radius of 12 cm and a resistance of 1.6 ohms, sits on a slanted surface, tilted at 30 degress from horizontal. Then the magnetic field is turn off and it decays exponentially to 0. (B=Boe-t/T) At the...
Coding in R Im trying to plot a histogram in R, and i know the basic...
Coding in R Im trying to plot a histogram in R, and i know the basic code for that, however, the code requires 2 plots coming from the same data set. for example, the voltage of an old process vs. a new process. is there any ways to seperate the 2 processes out from the data set to make 2 relative frequencyt histograms?
So I know that two particles can be entangled in a quantum way, but is it...
So I know that two particles can be entangled in a quantum way, but is it possible that more than two particles be entangled in a quantum way? Most descriptions provide with two-particles cases, so I wonder. (It's hard to think of three particles entangled in spin, or so.)
i) Describe the components of a fusion protein. ii)    Explain how fusion proteins are purified...
i) Describe the components of a fusion protein. ii)    Explain how fusion proteins are purified by affinity chromatography.
Based on the E-entrepreneurship concept. How to overcome or control the issue of 'sustaining competitive advantage'?
Based on the E-entrepreneurship concept. How to overcome or control the issue of 'sustaining competitive advantage'?
JAVA / I KNOW THERE IS MORE THAN ONE QUESTION BUT THEY ARE SO EASY FO...
JAVA / I KNOW THERE IS MORE THAN ONE QUESTION BUT THEY ARE SO EASY FO YOU I NEED YOUR HELP PLEASE HELP ME. I WILL GIVE UPVOTE AND GOOD COMMENT THANK YOU SO MUCH !!! QUESTION 1 Consider the following program segment: int i = 2; int n = 18; while (i < n) {     if ((i % 2) == 0) i++; else n--; } System.out.println( i ); What is the value of n when the above program...
I'm in a freshmen level physics class now, so I don't know much, but something I...
I'm in a freshmen level physics class now, so I don't know much, but something I heard today intrigued me. My TA was talking about how at the research facility he worked at, they were able to accelerate some certain particle to "99.99% the speed of light". I said why not 100%, and I didn't quite understand his explanation, but he said it wasn't possible. This confused me. Since the speed of light is a finite number, why can we...
So I have a lab practical coming up; how do I know when to take an...
So I have a lab practical coming up; how do I know when to take an IR spec versus making a TLC chamber? Follow up question: Can someone walk me through the interpretation of a TLC chamber?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT