In: Operations Management
Perform qualitative risk Analysis using a 5×5 matrix for software development System on 500 medical records for a health clinic
Levels of Probability and Impact on Four Specific Objectives Used to Evaluate Individual Risks.
Cost |
Schedule |
Resources |
Scope |
Health care information technology is on the brink of a paradigm shift. There is a push to implementing electronic medical records, and there are substantial risks associated with this critical initiative. These risks need to be identified and managed. Fortunately, project management is designed to manage risks. Project management methodology has a systematic approach to anticipating unknown risks, prioritizing known risks, and placing resources and attention toward those most likely to threaten the critical success of the project. There are, in effect, two types of risks associated with Health Care IT projects: project risks and organizational risks. These risks need to be managed meticulously in order for the organization to realize the business benefits and value of the project outcome. This paper will address both types of risks.
While there are many ways to approach risk, and these methods
vary by culture and industry, these differences are being addressed
in other forums.
Risk Analysis
in Software Testing
Risk Analysis is very essential for software testing. In software
testing, risk analysis is the process of identifying risks in
applications and prioritizing them to test. A risk is a potential
for loss or damage to an organization from materialized threats.
Risk Analysis attempts to identify all the risks and then quantify
the severity of the risks. A threat as we have seen is a possible
damaging event. If it occurs, it exploits vulnerability in the
security of a computer based system.
Items with higher risk values should be tested early and often.
Items with lower risk value can be tested later, or not at all. It
can also be used with defects.
How to perform Risk Analysis during software
testing
When a test plan has been created, risks involved in testing the
product are to be taken into consideration along with the
possibility of their occurrence and the damage they may cause along
with solutions; if any. Detailed study of this is called Risk
Analysis.
Some of the risks could be:
Cost | Schedule | Resource | Scope | |
Inadequate communication, more is better than less | 0.1 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.2 |
Vendor relationship | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Protection from Obsolensce – do not install an old system that will need major upgrade in few months, or will be sunsetted in few years (contractual protection – service agreements.) | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
Make sure you know your TCO (total cost of ownership) early on and let your executives and board know & Establish a PMO (Project Management Office) to assist with the planning and implementing your high-profile projects. | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.35 |
Risk Monitoring and Control in Health Information Technology Projects
Sources of Risk | Risk Management Strategy | |
1 | Planning Risks |
Avoid misunderstandings & scope creep, do SOW and WBS. Management commitment is critical, and needs to be built into the plan. If the project is too low in the management hierarchy, this task takes on added importance and takes more time as well. Support infrastructure must be identified or built into the plan. Alignment of the existing infrastructure elements may be needed to incorporate the new features of the project outcome. Reputation/credibility are important to earn trust of stakeholders; select and communicate credentials and track record. Visibility has pros and cons; getting the organization involved is necessary for quality; tell them what to expect so they buy in. Funding must be based on accurate estimates and realistic for the full scope of the product life cycle. Budget for close out. Public relations are a part of the plan; a conflict management plan is less visible, but is part of good risk management. Put detractors into the risk management plan and assign someone to maintain relationships with each skeptic throughout the project. Organizational/Project Governance |
2 | Initiation Risks | Avoid grandiose goals. SMART goals are necessary to engage the best efforts of the team and to sustain credibility for the end results. If you cannot quantify it and manage the triple constraint, break it into smaller, sequential projects. Do not over promise; protect early estimates of time and cost from becoming set in stone. Estimates are based on operations that have already benefited from repetition and refinement. |
3 | Scheduling Risks |
Delay: Seek out historical precedence from other IT projects in the past. What is the average delay, and typical causes? Overrun: Calculate the average standard overrun of other projects and build that into conservative estimates of completion. Crashing: Is it a habit? It is a risk? Is it a result of poor planning? Inertia: Create a sense of urgency with realistic but firm due dates. Implications of inertia are that letting the project extend too long allows unknown crises to immerge. Over-analyzing issues is counterproductive; select project managers with a natural inclination to take action. Deliverable/milestone tracking system |
4 | Resources Risks |
Practitioner: Get the right expertise, protect their allocation by involving their management in the value proposition. Proper orientation, training, job roles and teamwork are a given. Delegate enough authority so they are empowered to do their job, and protect them from unwanted interference. Know when to escalate to their upper management to avoid stalling. Middle Management: Focus on relationship skills as well as technology or business knowledge; do not underestimate the importance of meetings. It is not top down; it is middle up.* Try weekly meetings to review priorities and backlogs. Executive: Get and keep the right sponsorship at the right organizational level to run interference for the project on all fronts. Project governance needs to be set at the right organizational level to involve the key players in all departments. Allocation: compare to other projects 100% allocation, not more to avoid burn-out, implement methods for retention. Executive sponsor intervention…stealing staff Lack/shortage – hire & retain the best and brightest Access to qualified expertise Contracting: if possible (pros/cons) feasibility (expand the role of the business analyst to incorporate the entire system. Hire business analysts who can sell the concept and negotiate the appropriate support or issue resolution.) |
5 | Procurement Risks |
Vendor Management Contracts/agreements Legal Advice Maturity level match of capabilities |
6 | Quality Risks |
Avoid compromises or Gold Plating Quality assurance Quality control Advocacy vs. collaborative decision making (quality process) |
7 | Communication Risks |
Inadequate communication, more is better than less Appropriate media for level of recipient and content/complexity of message |
8 | Education/Training Risks |
Type (educate versus train) Amount of training and its cost Timing of training - Just in time training Certifications periodically and ongoing Value to delivery critical success factor |
9 | Relationship Risks |
|
10 | Budgetary Risks |
|
11 | Critical Path failure risk |
|
12 | Technology Risks |
|
13 | Acts of God – Force Majeure |
|
The goal of this is to share knowledge about risk management with the day-to-day practitioners, equip them with the tools to use on the job, and make them better project managers in risk assessment and documentation. We also, hope to instil confidence to use these techniques. We did not cover it all! This is a very dynamic field and information grows exponentially.
In summary, we have tried to describe the environment for healthcare information technology, the key players in this field, the critical issues, and industry experience.
The challenge is to introduce new concepts by using a holistic approach to managing risk. Taking into consideration the project as well as the organization, the software as well as the hardware, the programmer as well as the end user, consider partnering with your IT vendor. Plan and have a contingency plan. Involve your stakeholders and executives, and let them have a sense of ownership. Successful HIT projects are a collaborative effort, and working together is the only path to success.
Note: probablities have been decided on an estimate by just deciding importance of the object with factors