Question

In: Computer Science

Let’s give a formal proof that RadixSort works and give a bound on its runtime. We...

Let’s give a formal proof that RadixSort works and give a bound on its runtime.

We start with correctness:

Lemma RadixSort will properly sort any n natural numbers.
Prove this statement. You can use any strategy you want, but we recommend using induction on l (the number of digits that each value has).

Solutions

Expert Solution

Let's take the proof first , so as recommended we'll use the Induction Principle,

As suggested we'll take the value as the number of digits

P(1) The base case is easy to prove which you can just write

P(n) : Assume that for N numbers the unit/tenth/.. digit total

'n' and we can sort that part (for any N numbers)

P(n+1) : We have 1,2,3,...n+1

using the P(n) we can have 1,2,3...n be sorted easily and 2,3,4...n,n+1 as well, so from this we have 1,2,3..n+1 sorted entirely as well. So for digits at each location.

Therefore the Radix Sort Algorithm works.

Now to get the bound let's say for the N number have 'b' digits in each of then

We sort the 'bth' digits first for all N numbers, now the sorting here since has to be done into 1,2,3..9 only so we go for Counting Sort.

Which has a complexity of (n+k) where n is number of digits and k is the number of range what the counting sort does is it out everyone in one of the k boxes in our cases it's 10. So each sorting is O(n+10) and we have 'b' digits so it's a 'b' digit number so we do sorting for b times this thus total radix sort is

O(b(n+10)) now to consider n>>>>10 we have

O(bn) which is correct but in practice we know that there will.be some 5-50 digit number only so b becomes a constant and Radix Sort is O(n) times a constant.

Complexity thus is Linear.

Hope it helps, if any help needed put in comment


Related Solutions

Give a formal proof for the following tautology by using the IP rule. (A →B) ^...
Give a formal proof for the following tautology by using the IP rule. (A →B) ^ (B →C) →(A v B →C)
Give a formal proof for the following tautology by using the CP rule. A v B→(¬...
Give a formal proof for the following tautology by using the CP rule. A v B→(¬ B →(A ^ ¬ B))
Give a formal proof for the following tautology by using the CP rule. (A →(B →C))...
Give a formal proof for the following tautology by using the CP rule. (A →(B →C)) ^ B →(A →C)
Write a formal proof to prove the following conjecture to be true or false. If the...
Write a formal proof to prove the following conjecture to be true or false. If the statement is true, write a formal proof of it. If the statement is false, provide a counterexample and a slightly modified statement that is true and write a formal proof of your new statement. Conjecture: Let w, x, y, and z be single-digit numbers. The 4-digit number wxyz* is divisible by 9 if and only if 9 divides the sum w + x +...
Write up a formal proof that the angle bisectors of a triangle are concurrent, and that...
Write up a formal proof that the angle bisectors of a triangle are concurrent, and that the point of concurrency (the incenter) is equidistant from all three sides.
Give a proof, base the proof on the Determinant of a Vandermonde matrix that the INTERPOLATING...
Give a proof, base the proof on the Determinant of a Vandermonde matrix that the INTERPOLATING POLYNOMIAL exist and its unique.
Is the following argument valid? If so, construct a formal proof (direct or indirect). If not,...
Is the following argument valid? If so, construct a formal proof (direct or indirect). If not, explain why not. If Alex gets a new job, then he will buy a guitar. If Alex wins the lottery, then he will buy a guitar. If Alex goes to Costa Rica, then either Alex got a new job or Alex won the lottery. Alex goes to Costa Rica. Therefore, Alex bought a guitar.
Show in a formal mathematical proof, theoretical analysis, an even split of an array into two...
Show in a formal mathematical proof, theoretical analysis, an even split of an array into two subarrays which answers in the best performance of quicksort algorithm "appraised with respect to the running time". coding or empirical investigation are not needed.
Determine if the following statements are true or false. In either case, provide a formal proof...
Determine if the following statements are true or false. In either case, provide a formal proof using the definitions of the big-O, big-Omega, and big-Theta notations. For instance, to formally prove that f (n) ∈ O(g(n)) or f (n) ∉ O(g(n)), we need to demonstrate the existence of a constant c and a sufficient large n0 such that f (n) ≤ c g(n) for all n ≥ n0, or showing that there are no such values. a) 10000n2 ∈ O(n4)....
give an example of an error with a proof by case
give an example of an error with a proof by case
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT