In: Psychology
In the following selection, taken from Lamott’s popular book about writing, Bird by Bird (1994), she argues for the need to let go and write those “shitty first drafts” that lead to clarity and sometimes brilliance in our second and third drafts. 1Now, practically even better news than that of short assignments is the idea of shitty first drafts. All good writers write them. This is how they end up with good second drafts and terrific third drafts. People tend to look at successful writers who are getting their books published and maybe even doing well financially and think that they sit down at their desks every morning feeling like a million dollars, feeling great about who they are and how much talent they have and what a great story they have to tell; that they take in a few deep breaths, push back their sleeves, roll their necks a few times to get all the cricks out, and dive in, typing fully formed passages as fast as a court reporter. But this is just the fantasy of the uninitiated. I know some very great writers, writers you love who write beautifully and have made a great deal of money, and not one of them sits down routinely feeling wildly enthusiastic and confident. The first draft is the child's draft, where you let it all pour out and then let it romp all over the place, knowing that no one is going to see it and that you can shape it later. You just let this childlike part of you channel whatever voices and visions come through and onto the page. If one of the characters wants to say, "Well, so what, Mr. Poopy Pants?," you let her. No one is going to see it. If the kid wants to get into really sentimental, weepy, emotional territory, you let him. Just get it all down on paper because there may be something great in those six crazy pages that you would never have gotten to by more rational, grown-up means. There may be something in the very last line of the very last paragraph on page six that you just love, that is so beautiful or wild that you now know what you're supposed to be writing about, more or less, or in what direction you might go -- but there was no way to get to this without first getting through the first five and a half pages. 5I used to write food reviews for California magazine before it folded. (My writing food reviews had nothing to do with the magazine folding, although every single review did cause a couple of canceled subscriptions. Some readers took umbrage at my comparing mounds of vegetable puree with various ex-presidents' brains.) These reviews always took two days to write.
The whole thing would be so long and incoherent and hideous that for the rest of the day I'd obsess about getting creamed by a car before I could write a decent second draft. I'd worry that people would read what I'd written and believe that the accident had really been a suicide, that I had panicked because my talent was waning and my mind was shot. 8The next day, I'd sit down, go through it all with a colored pen, take out everything I possibly could, find a new lead somewhere on the second page, figure out a kicky place to end it, and then write a second draft. It always turned out fine, sometimes even funny and weird and helpful. I'd go over it one more time and mail it in. 9Then, a month later, when it was time for another review, the whole process would start again, complete with the fears that people would find my first draft before I could rewrite it. 10Almost all good writing begins with terrible first efforts. You need to start somewhere. Start by getting something -- anything -- down on paper. A friend of mine says that the first draft is the down draft -- you just get it down. The second draft is the up draft -- you fix it up. You try to say what you have to say more accurately. And the third draft is the dental draft, where you check every tooth, to see if it's loose or cramped or decayed, or even, God help us, healthy.
3.From what Lamott has to say, is writing a first draft more
about the product or the process? Do you agree in regard to your
own first drafts? Explain.
3. According to Lamott, the first draft is the child's draft. She called it the child's draft as in this draft a writer can pour out anything, he or she desires. In other words, the writer can uninhibitedly express himself or herself, without the fear of judgement. The first draft is the childlike part of the writer, as the writer like a child can pen whatever voices and visions com to him onto the page. According to Lamott, writing the first draft is more about the process in which the product gets lost. This is evident from what Lamott said that "There may be something in the very last line of the very last paragraph on page six that you just love, that is so beautiful or wild that you now know what you're supposed to be writing about, more or less, or in what direction you might go -- but there was no way to get to this without first getting through the first five and a half pages." By this Lamott meant that the process of writing is so long in which the product is hidden. But the long and seemingly unending process only functions to conceal the product, the description about which can give much-needed direction to the writers to step-up to the second draft or the "up-draft" (in which the writer refines his content making it more accurate) and the third draft or the "dental draft" (in which the writer checks every tooth so that each tooth is healthy).
I agree with Lamott. This is because while drafting the first draft, the entire content is not very coherent and concrete. We lack direction as to the organization and structure of the content. The first draft, therefore, becomes long in which everything is expressed whatever comes to mind. This helps to accumulate everything related to the topic being drafted. From the first draft, one can select the actual required portions, thereby refining the first draft and converting it into the second draft. In actuality, the first draft has "anything and everything" related to the topic or content, thereby making it a `process. From the process we can come to the product, but it takes longer only because of the process.