In: Economics
Although more than 80 percent of renters and owners consider their choice of housing as the most affordable alternative, the survey shows that renters are more likely to be burdened with costs. 34% of landlords spend more than one-third of their income on rent, while just 25% of homeowners spend too much on mortgage. Baby boomer homeowners prefer to spend less on housing than tenants of any generation, as a percentage of their income. Just 17 percent of homeowners in this generation are spending more than a third of their income on housing compared to 41 percent of renters.
Households contending with cheap and insecure housing are facing significant harms. Such problems are, more specifically, Reduce usable residual income for other basic needs and save the ability of households (including the willingness of landlords to save). Amass down payment funds that allow homeownership-generated wealth). The struggle to get shelter may be Forcing painful trade-offs between achieving current ends and maximizing future employment opportunities Paying for accommodation for low-income households Leaves so little remaining that they drastically minimize food, transportation and healthcare costs, all with Significant consequences for personal health and financial stability.
The country also has a long history of redlining, segregation and discriminatory housing policies that have created enormous disparities in access for people of color to affordable housing and home ownership choices, and this has stifled the growth of household wealth in those neighborhoods. Restrictive zoning codes are also an important weapon in fighting new construction and sometimes densification, helping to limit the availability of housing even as demand increases. Whether restricting the height of new buildings or choosing to allow a minimum number of parking spaces for large apartment buildings, these limitations make development more complicated and more costly.