In: Statistics and Probability
For situations in which the disease of interest (urinary bladder cancer, in this case) is very rare, which type of epidemiologic study will be more likely to result in a significant result when there is a true association between the risk factor and disease? Why is this so?
Epidemiology of Bladder cancer(BC) :
BC is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, the 7th most common cancer in men and the 17th in women . The worldwide age-standardized incidence rate is 9 per 100,000 for men and 2 per 100,000 for women (2008 data) .
In the European Union (EU), the age-standardized incidence rate is 27 per 100,000 for men and 6 per 100,000 for women [1]. The incidence of BC varies between regions and countries; in Europe, the highest age-standardized incidence rate has been reported in Spain (41.5 in men and 4.8 in women) and the lowest in Finland (18.1 in men and 4.3 in women) .
Worldwide age-standardized mortality rate is 3 for men versus 1 per 100,000 for women. In the EU, the age-standardized mortality rate is 8 for men and 3 per 100,000 for women, respectively . In 2008, BC was the eighth most common cause of cancer-specific mortality in Europe .
The incidence of BC has decreased in some areas, possibly reflecting the decreased impact of causing agents, mainly smoking and occupational exposure . Mortality from BC has also decreased, possibly reflecting an increased standard of care.