Question

In: Finance

Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12 megawatt compression turbine to...

Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12 megawatt compression turbine to Rebecke-Terwilleger Company of the Netherlands for €4,000,000, payable in three months (90 days). Larkin derived its price quote of €4,000,000 by dividing its normal U.S. dollar sales price of $4.320,000 by the then current spot rate of $1.0800/€.

Four approaches are possible:

1. Hedge in the forward market. The 3-month forward exchange quote was $1.1060/€.

2. Hedge in the money market. Larkin could borrow euros in the Libor market at 8% per annum and invest in € at 5% p.a. In

the USD Libor market the firm can borrow at 7% p.a. and invest at 4% p.a.

3. Hedge with foreign currency options. August put options were available at strike price of $1.1000/€ for a premium of 2.0%

per contract. August call options with a strike at $1.1000/€ could be purchased for a premium of 3.0%.

4. Do nothing. Larkin could wait until the sales proceeds were received in August and sell the euros received for dollars in the

spot market.

Larkin’s banker forecasts that the exchange rate in 90 days will be $1.1400/€.

What should Larkin do?

Solutions

Expert Solution

The amounts receivable under the four options are worked out below:
1] Forward hedge:
Amount receivable = 4000000*1.1060 = $   44,24,000
2] MMH:
As the receivable is in Euros, the firm should
create liability in Euros, which will have a value
of Euros 4000000 in 90 days.
Hence, it should borrow euros 4000000/1.02 = €   39,21,569
This should then be converted to $ to get 3921569*1.08 = $   42,35,294
These dollars would be invested for 90 days to get 4235294*1.01 = $   42,77,647
This would be the effective amount receivable
under the MMH.
3] Amount realizable under the put option, if exercised = 4000000*1.1 = $   44,00,000
Less: FV of option premium = 4000000*2%*1.0175 = $         81,400
Net amount receivable under the put option $   43,18,600
4] Amount realizable under do nothing if spot is $1.14 after 90 days = 4000000*1.14 = $   45,60,000
5] Larkin can leave the exposure unhedged if he
has faith in his banker's prediction as it would
give the highest amount.
If he decides not to rely on the banker's
prediction of the future spot, he should go for
the forward hedge which, gives the next highest
amount.

Related Solutions

On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12-megawatt compression...
On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12-megawatt compression turbine to Rebecke-Terwilleger Company of the Netherlands for €4,000,000 payable on August 1. Larkin determined the €4,000,000 price tag on April 1 when the spot rate was $1.0800/€. By the time the order was received and booked on May 1, the euro strengthened to $1.100/€. Nevertheless, Larkin’s Director of Finance now wonders if the firm should hedge against a reversal of the recent trend...
Larkin Hydraulics. On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a...
Larkin Hydraulics. On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12-megawatt compression turbine to RebeckeTerwilleger Company of the Netherlands for €4,000,000, payable as €2,000,000 on August 1 and €2,000,000 on November 1. Larkin derived its price quote of €4,000,000 on April 1 by dividing its normal U.S. dollar sales price of $4.320,000 by the then current spot rate of $1.0800/€. By the time the order was received and booked on May 1, the euro...
16. Larkin Hydraulics. On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold...
16. Larkin Hydraulics. On May 1, Larkin Hydraulics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar (U.S.), sold a 12-megawatt compression turbine to Rebecke-Terwilleger Company of the Netherlands for €4,000,000, payable as €2,000,000 on August 1 and €2,000,000 on November 1. Larkin derived its price quote of €4,000,000 on April 1 by dividing its normal U.S. dollar sales price of $4.320,000 by the then current spot rate of $1.0800/€. By the time the order was received and booked on May 1, the...
In January of 2019, a wholly owned subsidiary sold Equipment to the parent for a cash...
In January of 2019, a wholly owned subsidiary sold Equipment to the parent for a cash price of $122,500. The subsidiary had acquired the equipment at a cost of $140,000 and the estimated useful life when purchased was 10 years, and there was no salvage value. The subsidiary had depreciated the equipment for 4 years at the time of sale using the straight line method. The parent retained the depreciation policy of the subsidiary and depreciated the equipment over its...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $210,000 in...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $210,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $189,000 but had a book value of only $115,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $310,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $101,300. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $330,000 in...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $330,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $297,000 but had a book value of only $181,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $430,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $140,900. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $190,000 in...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $190,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $171,000 but had a book value of only $104,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $470,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $154,100. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $250,000 in...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $250,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $225,000 but had a book value of only $137,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $350,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $114,500. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
You are the CFO of a U.S. firm whose wholly owned subsidiary in Mexico manufactures component...
You are the CFO of a U.S. firm whose wholly owned subsidiary in Mexico manufactures component parts for your U.S. assembly operations. The subsidiary has been financed by bank borrowings in the United States. One of your analysts told you that the Mexican peso is expected to depreciate by 30 percent against the dollar on the foreign exchange markets over the next year. What actions, if any, should you take?
ou are the CFO of a U.S. firm whose wholly owned subsidiary in Mexico manufactures component...
ou are the CFO of a U.S. firm whose wholly owned subsidiary in Mexico manufactures component parts for your U.S. assembly operations. The subsidiary has been financed by bank borrowings in the United States. One of your analysts told you that the Mexican peso is expected to depreciate by 30 percent against the dollar on the foreign exchange markets over the next year. What actions, if any, should you take?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT