In: Economics
How did the framers of the Constitution design it to accomplish promoting interstate commercial prosperity and trade, establish a full-time army to defend against outside threats, and possibly the most important of all of them, to stop tyranny.
On the ratification question, people rapidly split into two groups: Federalists and Anti-Federalists. This was supported by the Federalists. They appeared to be among the society's elite wealthy and well-educated landlords, businessmen, and retired military officers who believed a strong government would be ideal both for national security and economic development. A national currency which was created by the federal government would ease business transactions. The federal government's ability to regulate trade and place tariffs on imports would safeguard merchants from foreign competition.
In addition, the tax collection powers would allow the national government to finance internal improvements such as highways, which would also benefit businessmen. In New England, support for the Federalists has been particularly high. Smaller, less populated states supported the Constitution for obvious reasons, including the security of a powerful federal government. The document was ratified by Delaware and New Jersey within a few months of it being submitted to them for approval in 1787. This was adopted by Connecticut early in 1788. Some of the larger states, including Pennsylvania and Massachusetts, also voted in favour. In the summer of 1788, New Hampshire became the 9th state to ratify the Constitution.
That ratification approach was an unusual one. Since the authority inherent in the Articles of Confederation and the Congress of the Confederation had rested upon the consent of the states, the state legislatures would also have ratified changes to the government of the country. Rather, by calling on state legislatures to hold ratification conventions to approve the Constitution, the framers avoided asking lawmakers to approve a document that would force them to relinquish a degree of their own authority. Delegates chosen by their peers to represent their interests will be the people who attend the ratification conventions.
They were not asked to relinquish their authority; in addition, they were asked to enforce limitations on the authority of their state officials, whom they could not have chosen in the first place. Ultimately, because the new country was to be a republic in which power was exercised by the people through their elected representatives, the ultimate approval or rejection was deemed necessary. Unless it was approved by convention delegates, who were elected by popular vote, then the new government could rightly say it governed with the people's consent.