In: Operations Management
"In a very real sense, freedom of association is the foundation of the collective bargaining process. There must also be legal protection of the freedom of person to join a collective bargaining entity - this is what freedom of association is all about" Do you agree with the above quotation? Motivate your answer with reference to the protection of freedom of association of employees.
"In a very real sense, freedom of association is the foundation of the collective bargaining process. There must also be legal protection of the freedom of person to join a collective bargaining entity - this is what freedom of association is all about" - I completely agree with the above quotation.
Freedom of association is the right of workers and employers to freely form and join Workers Organisations such as trade unions, worker associations and worker councils or committees for the promotion and defence of occupational interests.
Collective bargaining is a process through which employers (or their organisations) and workers’ associations (or in their absence, freely designated workers’ representatives) negotiate terms and conditions of work. Both are fundamental rights and they are linked. Collective bargaining cannot work without freedom of association because workers’ views cannot be properly represented. Workers must be free to choose whether and how they are to be represented and employers must not interfere in this process.
Benefits of freedom of association
Freedom of association is good for people, good for society, good for business and good for morale.
1. Good for people: Workers who combine their interests by approaching their employer together as a group can help to balance the power inherent in any employment relationship. This encourages people to speak their minds without fear of reprisal. The relative security of numbers allows individuals to express themselves more openly and adds to the value of information that is exchanged.
2. Good for society: Rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are called ‘enabling rights’, because they enable citizens to organise in order to realise other human rights and they underpin the democratic process. Not only do these rights directly assist with the improvement of living and working conditions, they contribute more broadly to economic and social development. In developing countries, freedom of association and collective bargaining can help establish a stable foundation for growth.
3. Good for business: Extensive research stretching back to the 1930s has demonstrated that, at the individual company level, employee engagement and the feeling of being valued contribute to increased quality, productivity and performance. Good industrial relations are generally characterised by:
4. Good for morale: A dialogue-based workplace empowers and engages its workers, enhancing morale and leading to improvements in performance. By contrast, a subdued and disempowered workforce will tend towards low engagement and underperformance.
KEY REGULATORS
International standards
Freedom of association is enshrined in Article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), which states that everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and negotiation, and that no one may be compelled to belong to an association. Article 23.4 specifically provides for the right to join a trade union.
These rights have been most defined and elaborated in international labour law. The International Labour Organisation (ILO), a tripartite United Nations agency, has adopted two major conventions on freedom of association and collective bargaining:
National law
Most national labour and employment laws have very specific provisions on freedom of association, collective bargaining and the structures which support these. It is essential to be aware of all relevant legislation in the jurisdictions of operation.
PROTECTION OF FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION OF EMPLOYEES
Respect right of Employee to associate freely:
Members shall respect the right of Employees to associate freely in trade unions or workers organisations of their choice, without interference or negative consequences to them from the Member.
Respect right of Employee to collective bargaining:
Members shall respect the right of Employees to collective bargaining, and shall adhere to collective bargaining agreements, where such agreements exist. Members shall, subject to Applicable Law, participate in any collective bargaining processes in good faith.
The right of workers and employers to form and join organisations of their own choosing, without prior authorisation: Workers have the right to form or join any workplace organisation they choose. Neither the employer nor the government should interfere in this right in any way. Placing any requirement in a written or verbal contract that restricts this right is contrary to the principle of freedom of association.
The free functioning of trade unions: Neither management nor government should interfere in the internal affairs of a trade union. ILO Convention 98 makes it clear that such interference includes employers’ financial contributions to a union. This is not the same as providing agreed facilities, such as an office or telephone. It is also unacceptable for a management representative to be present during a union meeting, or for the management to approve the minutes of a union meeting before they are released to members.
Non-interference in election or duties of union representatives: ILO Convention 135 deals with workers’ representatives. Management should not try to place restrictions on whom the union members elect as their officers in terms of length of workplace service or educational level. This is nothing to do with the employer. Union members should be free to choose their representatives, who should then be free to carry out their duties without interference. This does not mean that representatives can do whatever they want or give up working. They should function in accordance with national law and/or under a collective agreement on such matters as the facilities they can use and the amount of time they can take off work for union duties (as is provided for in UK law, for example).
Non-interference by non-union bodies: There are examples of legally-based non-union worker representation, such as works committees in India and solidarismo organisations in Central America (Box 3.4). Where these bodies exist alongside independent unions, the ILO is clear that they should not undermine the position of the unions or their representatives. Instead, companies should encourage cooperation between the non-union body and the trade union.