Question

In: Nursing

By the spring of 1934, a great deal was known about poliomyelitis. The mode of transmission...

By the spring of 1934, a great deal was known about poliomyelitis. The mode of transmission was known to be person-to-person. The two-phase process of the disease was well understood, and mild non-paralytic infections or anterior poliomyelitis as well as paralytic infections were all understood to be major means of contagion. Animals and most insects were eliminated as vectors. It was known that some victims will die in a few days. Some would have crippling paralysis, and others would recover without a sign. The polio virus had been isolated and identified from most parts of the body---most importantly, the CNS; blood; saliva; gastrointestinal tract, especially the small intestine; mesenteric lymph nodes; and nasopharynx. The damage caused by the polio virus was known to be done in the spinal cord's anterior horn of the grey matter and in the brain tissue.*

When the poliomyelitis epidemic hit Los Angeles, many horror stories from past epidemics had been deeply planted in the minds of medical and nursing professionals. It appears that the medical professionals at the time were well informed about the facts of poliomyelitis, yet most ignored them and, moreover, failed to inform the public. The Contagious Unit of the Los Angeles General Hospital was responsible for most of the activities of the epidemic, and fear of the disease seemed to dominate its efforts, in spite of evidence that much of the sickness that occurred in June of 1934 was not poliomyelitis.*

Physicians and nurses were strained, worried, and terrified of contracting the disease themselves. By June 15, 50 cases a day were being admitted to most hospitals, yet by June 29, only 1 fatal case of poliomyelitis had occurred, producing a sample of the polio virus. A second case produced another sample on July 4.*

When the Poliomyelitis Commission arrived in Los Angeles from Yale University School of Medicine, headed by Dr. Leslie T. Webster of the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Science of new York City, a public meeting was held to review the situation of the epidemic. The meeting digressed to physicians and nurses discussing their risk of getting poliomyelitis and whether they might receive disability pensions if paralyzed by the disease and were disabled in the line of duty.*

New interns in training at the Los Angeles County Hospital were deprived of teaching and proper guidance because the attending physicians were afraid of getting the disease and stayed away, consulting by phone instead of going to the hospital. Doctors who worked at the County Hospital in the communicable disease wards were not welcome on house calls because their patients viewed the hospital as a pet house.*

No one knew how much of the disease that year was really polio. Nearly all adults, especially the nurses and doctors, were afraid of getting paralytic polio. In those who got the serious form of the disease, health care providers observed much pain and weakness, but very few deaths occurred. The number of cases of paralysis was much lower than one would expect. The question was this: Could it be another virus or different strain of the virus? Dr. Webster believed that 90% of the cases were actually not poliomyelitis.*

Researchers had little success in searching for the polio virus in the nasal passages of suspected victims through nasal washings. The disease could not be produced in monkeys or lab animals. Webster believed that the problem was complex and that the infantile part of the infantile paralysis was missing because most cases were in adults. The paralysis face of the disease was also missing, as no paralysis occurred in most cases.*

Oral washings with ropy (an adhesive, stringy-type thread that was soaked in a special solution and swirled around in the throat in order to capture samples of mucous tissue) were done routinely. Ropy washes were able to gather even a few flakes of mucous and the debris in it. The ropy washes used a special solution that helped save samplings of potential polio virus evidence and preserved the evidence for months (101) days for later study. Even after such a long time, the specimen could be spun in a centrifuge and yield the virus; thus, in future outbreaks, disease investigators would not need to take an army of public health workers along to gather specimens.*

Hysteria raged on in the main populace. Not only was the general public afraid of getting the disease, but a major part of the medical and nursing profession was also participating in the fear. Yet officials were not daring enough to tell the public that the disease was not polio. It was disclosed that half of the 1,301 suspected cases were not poliomyelitis. The actual attack rate was estimated to be from 4.4% to 10.7%.*

There was no doubt that Los Angeles was visited by the epidemic of poliomyelitis in the summer of 1934, but it was a mild one. Most of the people who were sick that summer were sick either from another disease (encephalitis, meningitis, or influenza) or from a mild form of a different strain of the poliomyelitis. Patients had atypical symptoms for polio, and the observed symptoms were rheumatoidal or influenzal with striking emotional tones of fear that they might get polio. It was observed by US Public Health Service officer Dr. A. G. Gilliam, of the Los Angeles County Hospital"s personnel, "Irrespective of actual mechanisms of spread and identity of the disease, this outbreak has no parallel in the history of poliomyelitis or any other CNS infections"*

As an unfortunate outcome of this epidemic and its resulting hysteria, patients who exhibited even a slight degree of weakness were immobilized in plaster casts. This was a common practice in the 1930s, and many were subjected unnecessarily to this treatment.

Answer the following three question below

Case Questions to Respond to

2. How serious was the polio epidemic of 1934?. What were the social, psychological, and political implications and their effects on the epidemiology of polio surrounding this case?

Solutions

Expert Solution

In 1934, poliomyelitis was not well known , and it transmitted to person to person . The two-phase process of the disease was well understood, and mild non-paralytic infections or anterior poliomyelitis as well as paralytic infections were all understood to be major means of contagion. Animals and most insects were eliminated as vectors. It was known that some victims will die in a few days. Some would have crippling paralysis, and others would recover without a sign. The polio virus had been isolated and identified from most parts of the body---most importantly, the CNS; blood; saliva; gastrointestinal tract, especially the small intestine; mesenteric lymph nodes; and nasopharynx. The damage caused by the polio virus was known to be done in the spinal cord's anterior horn of the grey matter and in the brain tissue.

Knowing about the adverse effects it was ignored by the scientist , doctors , paramedical staff , nurses and even by the government as the result when los Angeles pandamic arrived , the doctors and medical staffs were reluctant to treat the patients and neither did they inform the public .

The Contagious Unit of the Los Angeles General Hospital was responsible for most of the activities of the epidemic, and fear of the disease seemed to dominate its efforts, in spite of evidence that much of the sickness that occurred in June of 1934 was not poliomyelitis.

When the Poliomyelitis Commission arrived in Los Angeles from Yale University School of Medicine, headed by Dr. Leslie T. Webster of the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Science of new York City, a public meeting was held to review the situation of the epidemic. The meeting digressed to physicians and nurses discussing their risk of getting poliomyelitis and whether they might receive disability pensions if paralyzed by the disease and were disabled in the line of duty.

New interns in training at the Los Angeles County Hospital were deprived of teaching and proper guidance because the attending physicians were afraid of getting the disease and stayed away, consulting by phone instead of going to the hospital.

Hysteria raged on in the main populace. Not only was the general public afraid of getting the disease, but a major part of the medical and nursing profession was also participating in the fear. Yet officials were not daring enough to tell the public that the disease was not polio. It was disclosed that half of the 1,301 suspected cases were not poliomyelitis. The actual attack rate was estimated to be from 4.4% to 10.7%.

Summary the 1934 epidemic lead to hysteria in main populace , doctor , paramedical staff , nurses , general public and even the government was afraid of it. There was no proper channel of information and guideline lead by ignorance which caused the 1934 los angles epidemic .

From an endemic disease it has become epidemic in many places, and,
indeed, has become a common periodic scourge. Originally regarded as
a disease limited to infants, it is no longer confined to infancy. From being
considered as mildly contagious or infectious, it is now regarded as highly
infectious. From being an infection in which the clinical picture was
originally thought to be limited to acute paralysis, it is now regarded as
one in which one case in a hundred, more or less, of those infected becomes paralysed. From a disease which was for a time considered as a respiratory infection.


Related Solutions

By the spring of 1934, a great deal was known about poliomyelitis. The mode of transmission...
By the spring of 1934, a great deal was known about poliomyelitis. The mode of transmission was known to be person-to-person. The two-phase process of the disease was well understood, and mild non-paralytic infections or anterior poliomyelitis as well as paralytic infections were all understood to be major means of contagion. Animals and most insects were eliminated as vectors. It was known that some victims will die in a few days. Some would have crippling paralysis, and others would recover...
By the spring of 1934, a great deal was known about poliomyelitis. The mode of transmission...
By the spring of 1934, a great deal was known about poliomyelitis. The mode of transmission was known to be person-to-person. The two-phase process of the disease was well understood, and mild non-paralytic infections or anterior poliomyelitis as well as paralytic infections were all understood to be major means of contagion. Animals and most insects were eliminated as vectors. It was known that some victims will die in a few days. Some would have crippling paralysis, and others would recover...
There is a great deal of talk about the liberal bias of the media in American...
There is a great deal of talk about the liberal bias of the media in American politics. To what extent is the media liberal? To what extent, do you think, it is biased? Considering the growing importance of conservative talk and news enclaves that support conservative causes, describe the ways in which discussions of a liberal bias in the media might be qualified? What other factors might mitigate the liberalism of the media?
There has been a great deal of discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of moving to...
There has been a great deal of discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of moving to a global currency, similar to how the Euro is the currency for Europe. Conduct internet research and find an article on the pros and cons of a global currency. Note: do not use leaksource.wordpress.com. It is not a reputable source. Initial Post: What are your thoughts on having a global currency? Summarize your research and post your thoughts for or against and why.
We have learned a great deal about the history of exposure to environmental toxins in the...
We have learned a great deal about the history of exposure to environmental toxins in the twentieth century - from lead in paint and gas, occupational exposures to toxins, to air pollution, to Love Canal. Choose three of these cases and analyze them comparatively in terms of causes, responses, and lessons for ongoing environmental health challenges. answer in few paragraphs
Describe what is known about transmission of both Ebola and Coronavirus. You must include in this...
Describe what is known about transmission of both Ebola and Coronavirus. You must include in this answer a discussion of the organism itself (i.e. is it a virus, bacteria- what makes it unique). Describe the immune response (both humoral and cell-mediated) to Ebola and Coronavirus that typically occurs (please include a graphic depiction). Discuss the difficulty in creating a vaccine for both Ebola and Coronavirus. Discuss the cultural and lifestyle changes that can reduce transmission of both Ebola and Coronavirus...
We discussed "Institutions" a great deal. Pick two of the institutions we read about and discuss...
We discussed "Institutions" a great deal. Pick two of the institutions we read about and discuss their evolution in Western Europe. Consider the factors that drove the institutions to change over time. In addition, consider the impacts the changing institutions had on economic activity.
A great deal of information has been written in the popular press about the COVID-19 pandemic....
A great deal of information has been written in the popular press about the COVID-19 pandemic. In preparation for the discussion, which is meant to be a wide-ranging conversation about the ethical issues that arise during a pandemic like COVID-19, read articles in the popular press to help you understand the issues that are in conflict. Research the public health ethics professional literature to help you understand the authoritative role of public health during pandemics. Look for general principles rather...
Complete the following tables. Disease Virus 1 major symptom Transmission Immunization Rabies Poliomyelitis Influenza Rubella Chickenpox...
Complete the following tables. Disease Virus 1 major symptom Transmission Immunization Rabies Poliomyelitis Influenza Rubella Chickenpox (varicella) Shingles Mumps Hepatitis A Hepatitis B Dengue AIDS Disease Name of causative agent Transmission to humans Rocky Mountain spotted fever Epidemic typhus Rickettsialpox Q fever Trachoma Psittacosis Human monocytic ehrlichiosis
1. Describe what is known about the transmission of both Ebola and Coronavirus. You must include...
1. Describe what is known about the transmission of both Ebola and Coronavirus. You must include in this answer a discussion of the organism itself (i.e. is it a virus, bacteria- what makes it unique). 2. Describe the immune response (both humoral and cell-mediated) to Ebola and Coronavirus that typically occurs (please include a graphic depiction). 3. Discuss the difficulty in creating a vaccine for both Ebola and Coronavirus. 4. Discuss the cultural and lifestyle changes that can reduce transmission...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT