"Although Europeans would come to dominate the New
World, they could not have done so without...
"Although Europeans would come to dominate the New
World, they could not have done so without Africans and native
peoples." Briefly discuss your opinion of this
statement.
Solutions
Expert Solution
Europeans may have been intrigued by the stories of the feared
Vikings’ discovery of a “new world,” but they lacked the resources
or the will to follow their path of exploration.
This age of exploration and the subsequent creation of an
Atlantic World marked the earliest phase of globalization, in which
previously isolated groups—Africans, Native Americans, and
Europeans—first came into contact with each other, sometimes with
disastrous results. American Indians who confronted the newcomers
from Europe suffered unprecedented losses of life, however, as
previously unknown diseases sliced through their populations.
They also were victims of the arrogance of the Europeans, who
viewed themselves as uncontested masters of the New World, sent by
God to bring Christianity to the “Indians.”
West Africa, a diverse and culturally rich area, soon entered
the stage as other nations exploited its slave trade and brought
its peoples to the New World in chains. Although Europeans would
come to dominate the New World, they could not have done so without
the slave labor of Africans and the exploitation of indigenous
peoples.
Slavery was always used against people of the place a nation
conquered, especially in the 1400s to 1800s, where coincidentially
Europeans ruled the world.Slaves were considered a thing with no
privileges and no rights, so using them for work was much easier
than getting a white European to work.
Native Americans were used as slaves in the beginning, but they
were much weaker than Africans, so it was preferred to have
Africans as workers.
The supply of such servants dried up as news of what servitude
in the New World was really like got back home, and it was found
that Europeans did very poorly in the more tropical climes where
the major plantation crops were grown (sugar especially, rice, and
later cotton) once tropical diseases from Africa also arrived
(malaria, yellow fever, etc.)
Africans however had good resistance to African and European
diseases, and a ready source of supply was set up on the coast of
Africa which operated for more than three centuries. African
slavery was found to be the most profitable source of labor
generally, and in the tropical climates the only viable labor force
available. White overseers on Caribbean plantations had an
extremely high mortality rate from tropical disease, even though
they didn't do any of the arduous field work.
Europeans at the same time were trading with Africa, and saw
that they had slave systems in place. So they started to buy slaves
and as the demand grew for slaves, this is how the slave trade
grew.
Why did Europe come to dominate the rest of the world? What was it
that made them so much better than great civilizations such as
Islam, India, China, etc.?
The price of Melbourne's croissants could rise amid world butter
shortage
You can't have croissants without butter. Lots and lots of
it.
But Melbourne's bakers are now contemplating a world sans the
crescent-shaped pastry's principal ingredient, as fears of a global
butter shortage continue to churn.
In France – home of the flaky breakfast staple and its equally
delectable cousin, the pain au chocolat — they're describing it as
the worst butter shortage since World War II. Butter has
disappeared...
Based on what you have learned about Native Americans
and Europeans, you could probably guess that there would be
problems between the European invaders and the Natives. What were
the biggest problems between them? Could it have been different,
that is, could the two sides have come to terms for a peaceful
relationship?
What would the experience of the world be like without iconic
memory? How would its absence make life difficult? Explain in
detail and give examples in 150 words or more.
Although the free-trade argument tends to dominate in the classroom, virtually all nations have imposed restrictions on the international flow of goods, services and capital. The proponents of protectionism say that free trade is fine in theory, but that it does not apply in the real world because modern trade theory assumes perfectly competitive markets whose characteristics do not reflect real-world market conditions. Over the years, a number of arguments have been advanced to pressure the governments to enact restrictive...