What is "RELUCTANCE TO SIMPLIFY" as it pertains to implications for leaders and managers in high...

What is "RELUCTANCE TO SIMPLIFY" as it pertains to implications for leaders and managers in high hazard and non-hazard organizations?

Expert Solution

Reluctance to Simplify is a reliability-enhancing concept which emphasizes on the organization's capability to avoid making any pre-occupied assumptions regarding the causes of a failure (either hazard-related or otherwise). Managers and leaders subscribing to this doctrine take deliberate steps to create a more nuanced and complete picture (Weick & Sutcliffe, 2007). Organizations following the concept of reluctance to simplify believe that failures are systemic, rather than localized, and could probably lead to a widespread causal chain of events with potentially catastrophic consequences (Weick et al., 1999). Leaders and managers recognize that their organizations must filter information and doing so may lead them to disregard key sources of problems. High reliability leaders not only self-practice this concept but also help employees handle temptations to simplify by installing system checks and balances, adversarial reviews, and multiple perspectives.

Reference

Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. 2007. Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. 1999. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings, (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 21: 81–123. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

keosha answered 6 months ago

What are the implications business managers?

What are the characteristics of effective managers and effective leaders?

“Good leaders are not necessarily good managers, and good managers are not necessarily good leaders.” (Kinicki...

“Good leaders are not necessarily good managers, and good managers are not necessarily good leaders.” (Kinicki text, p. 327) Most people confuse leadership and management. We have learned that leadership and management are different skills. Demonstrate that you understand the difference in this case study. Think of someone you know personally (not a public figure), and consider to be a good leader. What are the behaviours of this specific leader that distinguish them from being a manager? Give specific examples...

What are the implications for managers in trying to create rewards that motivate?

what is the financial management skill or competencies of nirsing leaders amd managers?

#1) What are the primary differences between managers and leaders? Can someone be a manager and...

#1) What are the primary differences between managers and leaders? Can someone be a manager and a leader? Why or why not? Consider your current place of employment, or any past place of employment. List the job title and describe at least one position which fits your description of manager. Then list the job title and describe a different position that fits your description of a leader. Consider the leadership position you've listed and described in Requirement #3, did this...

A common mistake public health leaders and managers make is?

What are the implications for emergency managers seeking to design preparedness, response, and recovery programs? What...

What are the implications for emergency managers seeking to design preparedness, response, and recovery programs? What do you think the priorities must be and why?

Corporate governance and implications of country level governance as it pertains to international finance?

The implications of semi-strong form efficiency for investors and managers.

Question