Question

Briefly explain the expectancy model of motivation.

Answer 1

Expectancy model of motivation-

The expectancy theory was proposed by Victor Vroom of Yale School of Management in 1964. The theory expresses that the force of a tendency to perform in a specific way is dependant on the power of a desire that the execution will be trailed by a definite outcome and on the interest of the result to the person.

The Expectancy theory expresses that worker's motivation is a result of how much an individual needs a reward (Valence), the appraisal that the probability that the exertion will prompt expected execution (Expectancy) and the conviction that the execution will prompt reward (Instrumentality). To put it plainly, Valence is the noteworthiness related by a person about the normal result. It is a normal and not the real fulfilment that a worker hopes to get subsequent to accomplishing the objectives. Expectancy is the confidence that better endeavours will bring about better execution. Expectancy is affected by variables, for example, ownership of fitting abilities for playing out the activity, accessibility of right assets, accessibility of vital data and getting the required help for finishing the activity.

Their investigation assessed the accompanying three factors :

1. Individual needs as reflected in the objectives looked for. Cases of these objectives would profit or getting along well in the workgroup.

2. Individual impression of the relative convenience of profitability conduct (high or low) as a methods for accomplishing wanted objectives.

3. The measure of opportunity from limiting elements the individual has in following the coveted way. Cases of obliging components may be supervisory and workgroup weights or constraints of capacity and learning.

Expectancy Theory or "Compete Theory" depends on the commence that motivation happens when three particular conditions are fulfilled: effort, performance and outcome. Consider motivation a chain where each connection speaks to a condition and the crossing point of each connection speak to its segments: hope, instrumentality, and valence. Inside the chain, a man anticipates that their exertion will bring about some level of execution (hope). The apparent or expected result of their execution level will be viewed as instrumental to the result (instrumentality). At last, a man will put subjective incentive on their conviction about the result (valence). This esteem will decide how acceptable the result is to them.

Pro’s

1. Generally acknowledged theory for clarifying a person's basic leadership process.

2. Momentum inquires about for the most part bolsters the basic leadership ideas proposed by the Expectancy Theory of Motivation.

Cons

1. Doesn't take the enthusiastic condition of the person into thought.

2. The person's identity, capacities, abilities, learning, and in addition past encounters, are factors influencing the result of the model.

3. The expectancy theory of motivation is an "observation" based model.

4. The chief needs to figure the motivational power (the esteem) of a reward for a representative.

5. Can be hard to execute in the gathering condition.