Centralization decision making is a hierarchical
structure of decision making that can be based on the
basis of rank, experience, seniority, etc of the company. It can
result in cost-efficient, uniformity, better coordination and
command along with enhanced work quality and goal-oriented
command.
But at times centralization might affect the people who are at
the receiver side or at the bottom of the pyramid. Local managers
who are at the bottom of the chain are adversely affected by
centralized decision making as
- It is not necessary that decision making is
inclusive. As the local managers might face the
lack of strategic action taken at ground-level according to their
need as aspiration. Eg- If Walmart decided to introduce tuna fish
in an area where demand is less then this may back-fire
 
- This leads to another problem of uniformity of decision
making. MNC has a competitive advantage with a local
product on the basis of its product quality at less price. But if
they introduce a product which is not required in an area then it
would result in loss.
 
- This loss further leads to dis-economies of scale as they might
have gained a lot when they had area based
specialization each local manager had the
autonomy to report for its product.
 
- In fact at times of adverse impact, the experience and
knowledge of local managers are useful.
 
- This further leads to the organisational
burden which could have avoided if local managers have
been involved. This will also lead to greater profit.
 
Although it has some criticism of duplication of cost, a problem
in getting consistency.
But it is often said that diversity thrives in adverse
time. Hence one should allow more inclusive
policies in decision making for the holistic growth of
MNCs.