Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Predict what the temperature anomaly would be at a CO2 level of 450 ppm CO2 (ppm)...

Predict what the temperature anomaly would be at a CO2 level of 450 ppm

CO2 (ppm) Temp Anomaly (deg. C)
335.40 0.2
336.84 0.34
338.75 0.43
340.11 0.14
341.45 0.39
343.05 0.21
344.65 0.2
346.12 0.25
347.42 0.41
349.19 0.52
351.57 0.38
353.12 0.53
354.39 0.53
355.61 0.24
356.45 0.28
357.10 0.39
358.83 0.57
360.82 0.49
362.61 0.55
363.73 0.85
366.70 0.6
368.38 0.58
369.55 0.68
371.14 0.8
373.28 0.78
375.80 0.69
377.52 0.88
379.80 0.78
381.90 0.86
383.79 0.65
385.60 0.79
387.43 0.92
389.90 0.79
391.65 0.77
393.85 0.81
396.52 0.88
398.65 0.96
400.83 1.23

Solutions

Expert Solution

Using excel to run the regression analysis:

Input the values as shown below:

The output is

The regression line is:

Y = -3.80890230414214 + 0.0120298273917277 * X

When X = 450

Y = 1.60452002213531

Let me know in comments if anything is not clear. Will reply ASAP. Please do upvote if satisfied.


Related Solutions

Predict what the temperature anomaly would be at a CO2 level of 450 ppm CO2 (ppm)...
Predict what the temperature anomaly would be at a CO2 level of 450 ppm CO2 (ppm) Temp Anomaly (deg. C) 335.40 0.2 336.84 0.34 338.75 0.43 340.11 0.14 341.45 0.39 343.05 0.21 344.65 0.2 346.12 0.25 347.42 0.41 349.19 0.52 351.57 0.38 353.12 0.53 354.39 0.53 355.61 0.24 356.45 0.28 357.10 0.39 358.83 0.57 360.82 0.49 362.61 0.55 363.73 0.85 366.70 0.6 368.38 0.58 369.55 0.68 371.14 0.8 373.28 0.78 375.80 0.69 377.52 0.88 379.80 0.78 381.90 0.86 383.79 0.65...
Predict how the rate of CO2 production for a tube with glucose as the sample would...
Predict how the rate of CO2 production for a tube with glucose as the sample would change in the following scenarios, and why: (1.5 pt each) You use half the concentration of glucose compared to the original experiment. You put the tube in an ice water bath instead of into warm water. You put the tube into a very hot water bath instead of into warm water. You double the amount of yeast compared to the original experiment.
Below are Global carbon dioxide concentrations and the measured change in Global temperature (Temperature Anomaly) for...
Below are Global carbon dioxide concentrations and the measured change in Global temperature (Temperature Anomaly) for a period in our recent past: YEAR CO2 Concentration (ppm) Temperature Anomaly (ºC) 1981 339.93 .043 1985 343.13 .098 1989 350.17 .211 1992 355.25 .368 1995 360.15 .410 1999 364.05 .566 2002 372.01 .625 2005 380.14 .714 2009 384.12 .885 2012 399.21 1.07 2017 419.12 1.20 Using StatCrunch, construct a scatterplot that shows the relationship between the two variables (carbon dioxide concentrations and the...
If the concentration of atmospheric CO2 were double from its current value of 390 ppm, what...
If the concentration of atmospheric CO2 were double from its current value of 390 ppm, what would be the calculated pH of rainwater (assuming that CO2 were the only acidic input)? With respect to rising CO2 levels, do we have to be concerned about enhanced acidity of rain in addition to potential climate warming?
What does the model predict economic growth? What does it predict the level of GDP?
Solow model without ideas accumulation Consider the simple Solow model without ideas accumulation in the long term (steady-state). What does the model predict economic growth? What does it predict the level of GDP?
What is incorrect about anomaly?
What is incorrect about anomaly?Neglected firm effect is related to semi efficient market hypothesisSmall firm effect is that small firms have relatively superior risk adjusted returns to large firmsJanuary effect can be explained by weak form efficient market hypothesisa financial anomaly refers to results which cannot be explained by financial theories especially efficient market hypothesis2. Which of the following is wrong about the strong form of the Efficient Market Hypothesis?The strong form of the Efficient Market Hypothesis states that security...
Use the CO2 data and via Multiple regression select the two variables that predict the CO2...
Use the CO2 data and via Multiple regression select the two variables that predict the CO2 level with the best P-value. Make another table with these two variables and answer the questions. Numerical answers are rounded so choose the answer that matches the best: Hour CO Traffic Wind 1 2.4 50 -0.2 2 1.7 26 0.0 3 1.4 16 0.0 4 1.2 10 0.0 5 1.2 12 0.1 6 2.0 41 -0.1 7 3.4 157 -0.1 8 5.8 276 -0.2...
If the reported average amount of CO2 (ppm) levels, in parts per million, in 50 kitchen...
If the reported average amount of CO2 (ppm) levels, in parts per million, in 50 kitchen gas cooking appliances was 600.1 ppm and a sample standard deviation of 95.2 ppm. a. Find a 95% confidence interval for the mean amount of CO2 in all kitchen gas cooking appliances. b. If the investigators thought the standard deviation was 130 ppm, what sample size would be neces- sary to obtain an interval with of 50 ppm for a confidence level of 95/
The atmospheric CO2 concentration is increasing by about 2 ppm a year. Calculate the net amount...
The atmospheric CO2 concentration is increasing by about 2 ppm a year. Calculate the net amount (mass balance) of CO2 (in Tg of C) added to the atmosphere each year. If the sum of CO2 sources is 208,800 Tg of C, what is the size, in Tg of C, of all sinks?
(c) Predict the solubility of CO in CO2. Briefly explain your answer. (d) Predict the vapor...
(c) Predict the solubility of CO in CO2. Briefly explain your answer. (d) Predict the vapor pressure of CO and CO2. Briefly explain your answer.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT