Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Assignment #5: Analysis of Variance and Post Hoc Tests Directions: Using the information from the following...

Assignment #5: Analysis of Variance and Post Hoc Tests Directions: Using the information from the following scenario, conduct a one-way ANOVA and specify the LSD post hoc test. The superintendent is continuing to examine the data that has been reported for the district. Another question concerned the differences in performance on high stakes tests. To examine this issue, the superintendent obtained the average scale scores for schools that participated in the high stakes testing for the district and two comparison districts. The following scores were collected: Superintendent’s district: 281 301 297 312 344 306 326 279 306 317 299 302 Comparison district 1: 328 290 302 275 293 291 289 286 288 291 291 310 Comparison district 2: 283 279 274 304 291 278 271 304 269 281 291 278 1. What is the mean scale score for each district? 2. What is the standard deviation of the scale scores for each district? 3. State an appropriate null hypothesis for this analysis. 4. What is the observed or computed value of F? 5. What are the reported degrees of freedom for the Between Groups variance? 6. What are the reported degrees of freedom for the Within Groups variance? 7. What is the reported level of significance? 8. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA, would you accept or reject the null hypothesis? 9. Based on the results of the LSD post hoc test, identify which districts are significantly different. 10. Present the results as they might appear in an article. This must include a table and narrative statement that reports the results of the one-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc test. I also need to know how to enter it into the SPSS Calculator

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answwer:

Answers to question 1 and 2.

3) Ans:

Null hypothesis: The mean scores between each district are same.

Alternative Hypothesis: At least one district has difference mean score.

4)

The observed or computed value of F is 2.365.

5) Ans: The reported degrees of freedom for the Between Groups variance is 3-1=2.

6) Ans: The reported degrees of freedom for the Within Groups variance is 39.

7) Ans: The reported level of significance is 0.05 (standard).

8) Ans: Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA, we should accept the null hypothesis. Because the estimated p-value is 0.107 and larger than 0.05 level of significance.

9)

From 8 we know that there is no significant difference in mean scores. Hence, the LSD post hoc test can not identify which districts are significantly different at 0.05 level of significance.


Related Solutions

Assignment #5: Analysis of Variance and Post Hoc Tests Directions: Using the information from the following...
Assignment #5: Analysis of Variance and Post Hoc Tests Directions: Using the information from the following scenario, conduct a one-way ANOVA and specify the LSD post hoc test. The superintendent is continuing to examine the data that has been reported for the district. Another question concerned the differences in performance on high stakes tests. To examine this issue, the superintendent obtained the average scale scores for schools that participated in the high stakes testing for the district and two comparison...
Explain the use of post-hoc tests and a priori comparisons.
Explain the use of post-hoc tests and a priori comparisons.
1.Interpret the following results of analysis of variance. Interpret each statistic including post-hoc comparisons. Provide a...
1.Interpret the following results of analysis of variance. Interpret each statistic including post-hoc comparisons. Provide a complete interpretation using the five-step model of hypothesis testing. Oneway: Relationship Between Lab Section and Score on Stat Final                                                                                Descriptives Score on Stat Final N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Minimum Maximum Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 22 40.68 13.892 2.962 34.52 46.84 14 65 2 22 32.59 12.015 2.562 27.26 37.92 7 55 3 24 29.83 12.910...
When should you run post hoc tests? Why would you conduct a post hoc test? Explain...
When should you run post hoc tests? Why would you conduct a post hoc test? Explain why not just run three different t-Tests, one comparing groups 1 and 2, one comparing groups 1 and 3, and one comparing groups 2 and 3? Provide an example in which you would need to run a post-hoc test. sagreement.
When should you run post hoc tests? Why would you conduct a post hoc test? Explain...
When should you run post hoc tests? Why would you conduct a post hoc test? Explain why not just run three different t-Tests, one comparing groups 1 and 2, one comparing groups 1 and 3, and one comparing groups 2 and 3? Provide an example in which you would need to run a post-hoc test.
1. If a researcher reports the following finding, how many post hoc tests should they do?...
1. If a researcher reports the following finding, how many post hoc tests should they do? There was a significant effect of instruction condition on accuracy, F (3, 67) = 4.33, p < .05. 2. If a researcher reports the following finding, how many post hoc tests should they do? There was no statistically significant effect of physical crowding on aggression, F (2, 29) = 1.82, p > .05. 3. What is the additional source of variance in a repeated-measures...
hi I need to perform a post-hoc analysis using the bonferroni method of comparison and explain...
hi I need to perform a post-hoc analysis using the bonferroni method of comparison and explain the results. I need walked through this in clear simple steps using the following information: using an alpha of 0.05 Average college debt at graduation N.Y.- 14734, 16000, 14347, 14392, 12500 Virginia-14524, 15176, 12665, 12591, 18385 Cali- 13171, 14431, 14689, 13788, 15297 Penn.- 18105, 17051, 16103, 22400, 17976 i have set up the ANOVA table: treatment ss: 56889041 df 3 MS 18963013.7 F- 5.543...
Week 8 Discussion Consider the different post hoc tests discussed in the readings and respond to...
Week 8 Discussion Consider the different post hoc tests discussed in the readings and respond to the following: Describe the general rationale behind using post hoc tests (i.e., when they are used and why). One of the advantages of using an ANOVA (compared to using t-tests) is also a disadvantage—using an ANOVA makes it necessary to use post hoc tests if there is a significant main effect. We use a post hoc test because there is one specific advantage in...
List the appropriate post hoc test (or tests if more than one is suitable) for each...
List the appropriate post hoc test (or tests if more than one is suitable) for each scenario described: Weight gained by students dining at three different cafeterias over a six-month period Weight loss by students attending four different campus gym locations over a three-month period Planned comparisons of pre-med students’ average organic chemistry test scores across four different colleges, one of which is a state school, while the others are private schools Sleep quality measured in minutes, by students using...
​Perform three post hoc tests, comparing the three pairs of means from the previous question. Are there significant differences between:
5. [Using both Excel (show your work) and SPSS] ​Perform three post hoc tests, comparing the three pairs of means from the previous question. Are there significant differences between: A. Baseline and one minute? B. Baseline and two minutes? C. One minute and two minutes? Use a = .05 / 3 = .017 for each test. i only need excel version no need for Spss. Thank you 4. [Using both Excel (show your work) and SPSS] In a study of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT