Question

There are 8 dimensions of effective Microsystems. Which two (2) do you believe are the most important and why? Please provide examples to illustrate your position. Don’t forget to cite sources to support your position.

Answer 1

Here are 8 dimensions.

1. constancy of purpose
2. Alignment of role and training for efficiency and staff satisfaction
3. Investment in improvement
4. Interdependence of care team to meet patient needs
5. Connection to the community to enhance care delivery and extend influence
6. Ongoing measurement of outcomes
7. Supportiveness of the larger organization
8. Integration of information and technology into work flows

As per my view the 2 important dimensions are-

1. constancy of purpose
2. Integration of information and technology into work flows

. . Constancy of purpose is centered around extending the point of the bigger system. Coherence is built up between individuals from the Microsystems, persistent care, and the bigger system. Constancy of purpose is a critical factor when connected in all settings inside an association. Case: a general statement could be the purpose of the bigger system is to give quality care. The Microsystems expands this purpose by protecting the most noteworthy level of care is really given. Settled and consistent spotlight on cutting edge tasks

Integration of information and technology into work flows; appropriation of health IT crosswise over care settings can prompt more noteworthy productivity, better access to quality healthcare, and patient wellbeing. The usage of HIT may enhance health results, diminish drug mistakes, increase chronic infection administration, lessen health incongruities, and offer significant cost reserve funds.